Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

DB Deadlock when stress testing with silk #265

Closed
selimt opened this issue Jan 26, 2018 · 12 comments
Closed

DB Deadlock when stress testing with silk #265

selimt opened this issue Jan 26, 2018 · 12 comments

Comments

@selimt
Copy link

selimt commented Jan 26, 2018

I got a deadlock error when testing with the latest version of silk (1.1.0).

Here is the DB output:

        Process 149: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('629f685a-26dc-41ca-ba9d-cc8af1998ef9', '8336effc-217c-47a7-8cc2-6944b8aede7f', 'aa12852b-5f5b-40fa-a647-cc3ddd2ef4ba', '2b2d5e84-e595-4ccf-b06c-78db181b4f24', '3f94c00d-f0c3-4021-8def-703e363e4f8f', 'e88b9162-0455-4e78-ba7b-029694b493d8')
        Process 150: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('629f685a-26dc-41ca-ba9d-cc8af1998ef9', '9ad245bb-4b6a-49cf-b32c-1a547ee8c11f', '93c50572-f6ec-416c-a9d6-42798f1631dd', '1ffd6a86-f93e-48f8-a593-86184e26c417', '3f94c00d-f0c3-4021-8def-703e363e4f8f')
        Process 151: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('629f685a-26dc-41ca-ba9d-cc8af1998ef9', '9ad245bb-4b6a-49cf-b32c-1a547ee8c11f', 'aa12852b-5f5b-40fa-a647-cc3ddd2ef4ba', '8336effc-217c-47a7-8cc2-6944b8aede7f', '2b2d5e84-e595-4ccf-b06c-78db181b4f24', '93c50572-f6ec-416c-a9d6-42798f1631dd', '1ffd6a86-f93e-48f8-a593-86184e26c417', '3f94c00d-f0c3-4021-8def-703e363e4f8f', 'e88b9162-0455-4e78-ba7b-029694b493d8')
        Process 144: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('629f685a-26dc-41ca-ba9d-cc8af1998ef9', '9ad245bb-4b6a-49cf-b32c-1a547ee8c11f', 'aa12852b-5f5b-40fa-a647-cc3ddd2ef4ba', '8336effc-217c-47a7-8cc2-6944b8aede7f', '2b2d5e84-e595-4ccf-b06c-78db181b4f24', '93c50572-f6ec-416c-a9d6-42798f1631dd', '1ffd6a86-f93e-48f8-a593-86184e26c417', '3f94c00d-f0c3-4021-8def-703e363e4f8f', 'e88b9162-0455-4e78-ba7b-029694b493d8')
2018-01-26 01:03:55.996 UTC [148] HINT:  See server log for query details.
2018-01-26 01:03:55.996 UTC [148] STATEMENT:  DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('629f685a-26dc-41ca-ba9d-cc8af1998ef9', '9ad245bb-4b6a-49cf-b32c-1a547ee8c11f', 'aa12852b-5f5b-40fa-a647-cc3ddd2ef4ba', '8336effc-217c-47a7-8cc2-6944b8aede7f', '2b2d5e84-e595-4ccf-b06c-78db181b4f24', '1ffd6a86-f93e-48f8-a593-86184e26c417', '3f94c00d-f0c3-4021-8def-703e363e4f8f', 'e88b9162-0455-4e78-ba7b-029694b493d8')
2018-01-26 01:03:56.024 UTC [144] ERROR:  deadlock detected
2018-01-26 01:03:56.024 UTC [144] DETAIL:  Process 144 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (443,8) of relation 16579 of database 12994; blocked by process 149.
        Process 149 waits for ShareLock on transaction 152027; blocked by process 150.
        Process 150 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (440,10) of relation 16579 of database 12994; blocked by process 151.
        Process 151 waits for ShareLock on transaction 152109; blocked by process 144.

Output from pip freeze:

amqp==2.2.2
autopep8==1.3.4
billiard==3.5.0.3
blessings==1.6.1
bpython==0.17
cached-property==1.3.1
celery==4.1.0
certifi==2018.1.18
chardet==3.0.4
coreapi==2.3.3
coreschema==0.0.4
coverage==4.4.2
curtsies==0.2.11
Django==1.11.9
django-auth-ldap==1.3.0
django-cachalot==1.5.0
django-extensions==1.9.9
django-model-utils==3.1.1
django-prettyjson==0.3.0
django-rest-swagger==2.1.2
django-silk==1.1.0
django-url-filter==0.3.4
djangorestframework==3.7.7
drf-extensions==0.3.1
drf-nested-routers==0.90.0
enum-compat==0.0.2
gevent==1.2.2
gprof2dot==2016.10.13
greenlet==0.4.12
gunicorn==19.7.1
idna==2.6
itypes==1.1.0
Jinja2==2.10
kombu==4.1.0
Markdown==2.6.11
MarkupSafe==1.0
mercury==1.0.0
mock==2.0.0
openapi-codec==1.3.2
pbr==3.1.1
psycopg2==2.7.3.2
pycodestyle==2.3.1
Pygments==2.2.0
pyldap==2.4.45
python-dateutil==2.6.1
python-memcached==1.59
pytz==2017.3
requests==2.18.4
simplejson==3.13.2
six==1.11.0
sqlparse==0.2.4
standardjson==0.3.1
stevedore==1.28.0
typing==3.6.4
uritemplate==3.0.0
urllib3==1.22
vine==1.1.4
wcwidth==0.1.7
Werkzeug==0.14.1

Thanks
-Selim
@albertyw
Copy link
Member

Looks like the deadlock is from deleting the same rows from the garbage collector as reported in #261. Should be fixed in #267

@hgminh95
Copy link

I still encounter this issue in v2.0.0. So maybe #267 did not fully fix this issue.

Sample logs from db:

ERROR:  deadlock detected
DETAIL:  Process 33723 waits for ShareLock on transaction 404208689; blocked by process 33721.
        Process 33721 waits for ShareLock on transaction 404208701; blocked by process 33723.
        Process 33723: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('d6563662-8303-4b97-ad93-afacf36489aa', '3e526532-8785-47e8-ba3a-afd7f709ffd6', '854ea9ac-5f81-4346-b0a9-26b39c35a81c')
        Process 33721: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('3e526532-8785-47e8-ba3a-afd7f709ffd6', '854ea9ac-5f81-4346-b0a9-26b39c35a81c')

@gone
Copy link

gone commented Oct 19, 2018

I still get this as well - I think it might be related to cachealot which I have installed as well. Trying to turn off cachealot for silk via
CACHALOT_UNCACHABLE_TABLES = frozenset(('django_migrations', 'silk_response'))
And seeing if that works

@bj00rn
Copy link

bj00rn commented Dec 13, 2018 •
edited
Loading

getting this as well. Serving django through 4x daphne workers

daphne log

 File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 64, in execute
     return self.cursor.execute(sql, params)
 psycopg2.extensions.TransactionRollbackError: deadlock detected
 DETAIL:  Process 4930 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4929.
 Process 4929 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94641; blocked by process 4928.
 Process 4928 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94582; blocked by process 4926.
 Process 4926 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4930.
 HINT:  See server log for query details.


 The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/middleware.py", line 128, in process_response
     self._process_response(request, response)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/contextlib.py", line 52, in inner
     return func(*args, **kwds)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/middleware.py", line 110, in _process_response
     collector.finalise()
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/collector.py", line 158, in finalise
     query_model = models.SQLQuery.objects.create(**query)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", line 85, in manager_method
     return getattr(self.get_queryset(), name)(*args, **kwargs)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 394, in create
     obj.save(force_insert=True, using=self.db)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/contextlib.py", line 52, in inner
     return func(*args, **kwds)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/models.py", line 283, in save
     self.request.save(update_fields=['num_sql_queries'])
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/models.py", line 167, in save
     Request.garbage_collect(force=False)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/models.py", line 152, in garbage_collect
     cls.objects.filter(start_time__lte=time_cutoff).delete()
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 620, in delete
     deleted, _rows_count = collector.delete()
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/deletion.py", line 284, in delete
     count = qs._raw_delete(using=self.using)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 634, in _raw_delete
     return sql.DeleteQuery(self.model).delete_qs(self, using)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/subqueries.py", line 80, in delete_qs
     cursor = self.get_compiler(using).execute_sql(CURSOR)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/sql.py", line 45, in execute_sql
     return self._execute_sql(*args, **kwargs)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 899, in execute_sql
     raise original_exception
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/sql/compiler.py", line 889, in execute_sql
     cursor.execute(sql, params)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 64, in execute
     return self.cursor.execute(sql, params)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/utils.py", line 94, in __exit__
     six.reraise(dj_exc_type, dj_exc_value, traceback)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/utils/six.py", line 685, in reraise
     raise value.with_traceback(tb)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 64, in execute
     return self.cursor.execute(sql, params)
 django.db.utils.OperationalError: deadlock detected
 DETAIL:  Process 4930 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4929.
 Process 4929 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94641; blocked by process 4928.
 Process 4928 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94582; blocked by process 4926.
 Process 4926 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4930.
 HINT:  See server log for query details.


 During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/middleware.py", line 110, in _process_response
     collector.finalise()
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/silk/collector.py", line 158, in finalise
     query_model = models.SQLQuery.objects.create(**query)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/manager.py", line 85, in manager_method
     return getattr(self.get_queryset(), name)(*args, **kwargs)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/query.py", line 392, in create
     obj = self.model(**kwargs)
   File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/models/base.py", line 573, in __init__
     raise TypeError("'%s' is an invalid keyword argument for this function" % list(kwargs)[0])
 TypeError: 'model' is an invalid keyword argument for this function

Postgres log:

 ERROR:  deadlock detected
 DETAIL:  Process 4920 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94582; blocked by process 4926.
      Process 4926 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4929.
      Process 4929 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94641; blocked by process 4928.
      Process 4928 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (44,75) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4920.
      Process 4920: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('98a609f6-178c-4754-91d9-a500287f1a6e', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '0fce5919-c945-43ca-939f-915c6b89cb3a', '20eb66ac-23ee-466e-add7-888c98071a0f', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '92251ef1-feb4-4c72-a061-f04ebf8fb0a2', '6379e858-f6fc-44d3-aa5d-edc338c1683e', '436ff660-e456-42b3-ab88-018f18159d09')
      Process 4926: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', 'ed59a924-4830-4b92-8e56-cea6cd2ea273')
      Process 4929: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2')
      Process 4928: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '0fce5919-c945-43ca-939f-915c6b89cb3a', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '20eb66ac-23ee-466e-add7-888c98071a0f', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '6379e858-f6fc-44d3-aa5d-edc338c1683e')
 HINT:  See server log for query details.
 CONTEXT:  while deleting tuple (44,75) in relation "silk_response"
 STATEMENT:  DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('98a609f6-178c-4754-91d9-a500287f1a6e', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '0fce5919-c945-43ca-939f-915c6b89cb3a', '20eb66ac-23ee-466e-add7-888c98071a0f', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '92251ef1-feb4-4c72-a061-f04ebf8fb0a2', '6379e858-f6fc-44d3-aa5d-edc338c1683e', '436ff660-e456-42b3-ab88-018f18159d09')
 ERROR:  deadlock detected
 DETAIL:  Process 4930 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4929.
      Process 4929 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94641; blocked by process 4928.
      Process 4928 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94582; blocked by process 4926.
      Process 4926 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4930.
      Process 4930: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474')
      Process 4929: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2')
      Process 4928: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '0fce5919-c945-43ca-939f-915c6b89cb3a', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '20eb66ac-23ee-466e-add7-888c98071a0f', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '6379e858-f6fc-44d3-aa5d-edc338c1683e')
      Process 4926: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', 'ed59a924-4830-4b92-8e56-cea6cd2ea273')
 HINT:  See server log for query details.
 STATEMENT:  DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474')
 ERROR:  deadlock detected
 DETAIL:  Process 4926 waits for AccessExclusiveLock on tuple (9,89) of relation 21806 of database 20072; blocked by process 4929.
      Process 4929 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94641; blocked by process 4928.
      Process 4928 waits for ShareLock on transaction 94582; blocked by process 4926.
      Process 4926: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', 'ed59a924-4830-4b92-8e56-cea6cd2ea273')
      Process 4929: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2')
      Process 4928: DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', '87277d11-24c6-481c-a51d-40adcad0891b', '0fce5919-c945-43ca-939f-915c6b89cb3a', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '20eb66ac-23ee-466e-add7-888c98071a0f', 'f810b99c-446e-4272-88e0-4722ba133474', '6379e858-f6fc-44d3-aa5d-edc338c1683e')
 HINT:  See server log for query details.
 STATEMENT:  DELETE FROM "silk_response" WHERE "silk_response"."request_id" IN ('80a46b34-8b35-455b-9b12-ab8ae03121d3', 'a46762ea-9262-4943-b95c-171fb98f2fcd', '2d9bbe1d-43e2-4a17-afe6-8ddcd8b2036c', '45a61cf6-45c2-4a38-824c-0d9774db54d2', 'ed59a924-4830-4b92-8e56-cea6cd2ea273')

@vakorol
Copy link

vakorol commented Jun 6, 2019

Can't use django-silk in our development environment because of this issue. Requests fail quite frequently with :

Exception Type: OperationalError at /static/img/favicon.ico
Exception Value: (1213, 'Deadlock found when trying to get lock; try restarting transaction')

"DELETE FROM `silk_response` WHERE `silk_response`.`request_id` IN ( ..., ..., ...)"

MySQL 5.5
Django 1.11.20
Python 3.4.3
django-silk 3.0.2

@worsht
Copy link

worsht commented Aug 23, 2019

I'm seeing this as well.

python 3.7.3
postgres 11
django 2.2.4
django-silk 3.0.2

@gone
Copy link

gone commented Aug 29, 2019

Since configuring cachealot and silk to work together this error went away for me.

CACHALOT_UNCACHABLE_TABLES = frozenset(
    ("django_migrations", "silk_response", "silk_sqlquery", "silk_profile")
)

@aurashn
Copy link

aurashn commented Sep 25, 2019

Has anyone solved this issue? I am seeing this with:

Python 3.6
MySQL 5.6
django 2.2.5
django-silk 3.0.4

@vakorol
Copy link

vakorol commented Nov 4, 2019

I would like to draw the maintainers' attention to this issue, as it seems to affect multiple users. In fact, it is a blocker for me; I would really like to use django-silk in my projects, but I am unable to do so due to this problem.

@AdamMartinCote
Copy link

AdamMartinCote commented May 5, 2020 •
edited
Loading

I am experiencing the same issue with Postgres
Python 3.8
Postgres 12.2
django 3.0.6
django-silk 4.0.1

not using cachealot

@okke-formsma
Copy link

okke-formsma commented Oct 8, 2020 •
edited
Loading

As a workaround, make sure to set the SILKY_MAX_RECORDED_REQUESTS_CHECK_PERCENT very low (0.01 for example so it runs every 10_000 requests) and the SILKY_MAX_RECORDED_REQUESTS high (100_000 or more).

This way, the chances of running into this issue are much smaller (but still possible, depending on your load).

An even better workaround is to set SILKY_MAX_RECORDED_REQUESTS_CHECK_PERCENT to 0 and run the silky.Request.garbage_collect(force=True) method in a scheduled task through celery.

@waqas-ali-pk
Copy link

Issue still exists. :(

Any plan to resolve this annoying issue?

@nschlemm nschlemm mentioned this issue Jan 21, 2022
Open
nschlemm pushed a commit to nschlemm/django-silk that referenced this issue Jan 21, 2022
Added silk_request_garbage_collect command for out-of-band garbage co…
690e07f 
…llection.

To avoid deadlock issues as mentioned e.g. in jazzband#265 jazzband#294 jazzband#371
Based on jazzband#265 (comment)
@nschlemm nschlemm mentioned this issue Jan 21, 2022
Merged
albertyw added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 20, 2022
@nschlemm @albertyw
Added silk_request_garbage_collect command for out-of-band garbage co…
c59acba 
…llection. (#541)

* Added silk_request_garbage_collect command for out-of-band garbage collection.

To avoid deadlock issues as mentioned e.g. in #265 #294 #371
Based on #265 (comment)

* Okay, to please @codecov :)

Co-authored-by: Nikolaus Schlemm <capo@coder-nostra.de>
Co-authored-by: Albert Wang <git@albertyw.com>
yaroslav0114 pushed a commit to yaroslav0114/django-silk that referenced this issue Dec 17, 2022
@albertyw
Added silk_request_garbage_collect command for out-of-band garbage co…
c29387b 
…llection. (#541)

* Added silk_request_garbage_collect command for out-of-band garbage collection.

To avoid deadlock issues as mentioned e.g. in #265 #294 #371
Based on jazzband/django-silk#265 (comment)

* Okay, to please @codecov :)

Co-authored-by: Nikolaus Schlemm <capo@coder-nostra.de>
Co-authored-by: Albert Wang <git@albertyw.com>
@moonsikpark moonsikpark mentioned this issue Jun 4, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests