Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add adopters list #332

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
15 changes: 15 additions & 0 deletions ADOPTERS.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
* Atlassian
* Base CRM
* Booking.com
* Circonus
* Massachusetts Open Cloud
* Nets
* Orange
* Squarespace
* Stagemonitor
* Red Hat
* https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-openshift
* http://www.hawkular.org/blog.html
* UBER
* https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/
* Zenly
6 changes: 6 additions & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -53,6 +53,12 @@ Reach project contributors via these channels:
* [Gitter chat room](https://gitter.im/jaegertracing/Lobby)
* [Github issues](https://github.com/uber/jaeger/issues)

## Adopters

Jaeger is [used in production](./ADOPTERS.md) by organizations such as Atlassian, Orange, Red Hat and Uber.
Copy link

@codefromthecrypt codefromthecrypt Aug 13, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@caniszczyk doesn't this statement conflate "adopting" with production usage? For example, vendors typically are not end users, though sometimes they are. For example, I'd be surprised if @postwait and others at circonus replaced their core infrastructure with jaeger, even if they have a zipkin-jaeger plug-in for one of their projects.

Similarly Red Hat do run production infrastructure I think, does this mean the public openshift infrastructure is monitored with jaeger? or does it mean they support and build plugins and tooling for others?

TL;DR; is I think this is "leading the witness" in so far as it is conflating a list of folks participating in the ecosystem with being production users. Users have skin in the game, when something breaks, their alerts go off. Production usually means things like this. Maybe it is better to just call it an adopters list and leave bullets in the list for people to offer information about whether they are in production or not?

I think CNCF projects would have higher credibility if folks get accurate info about their projects.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's a fair point. There are different types of users on this list

  • some have full prod deployment
  • some are using Jaeger end to end, but in dev/qa (which could also a valid use case)
  • some are using parts of Jaeger like the client libs
  • some are using Jaeger as part of other products (e.g. vendors who may not even want to reveal their actual customers)
  • some are just experimenting

Rather than listing them as "Adopters", maybe we can name the readme section "Testimonials" and point to the survey (#207)?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We o the use the whole stack, but we use large parts and we use it in a production capacity.


If you use Jaeger in production, please consider adding yourself to our [ADOPTERS.md](./ADOPTERS.md)

## License

[The MIT License](./LICENSE).
Expand Down