Logic conditions

[hali9]

A some idea from #4533

1. Input logic one
2. BETWEEN operator
3. Permit in smix to put more that one condition using & operator

[DzikuVx]

On the topic of 3 -> Allow LCs to accept other LCs. At the end smix will be always activated by one LC

[DzikuVx]

And ONE should have internal value of 500.

[hali9]

@DzikuVx If You want take a look
development...hali9:logic-condition-1

[DzikuVx]

@hali9 I do not think it looks good with operand C. It makes everything so complex and consumes even more RAM than before. My idea was rather the following:

If a LC can accept a different LC as an operand the following is possible:

• LC 0 defines RX channel is > 1400
• LC 1 defines RX channel is < 1600
• LC 2 defines that LC 0 and LC 1 are true
• smix is activated when LC 2 is true

This way LCs are still 2 operand entities like they should be and all more complex conditions can be built using LCs as inputs to diffent LCs.
I have most of the GUI for LC ready and changing it to use 3 operand would be a major PITA.
Let me propose a PR that accepts LCs as arguments. How about that?

[DzikuVx]

@hali9 look at #4555

[hali9]

Quick attention: I have 3 LC (using beetween). Now instead 1 LC I have 3 LC, so I need 9 LC.
The logic list is limited to 8, this is realy low.
This will ok as between operator if logic list count will be high 16 for example.

* `LC 2` defines that `LC 0` and `LC 1` are true

how we will compare it: true > true, true == false ?
do we need creaate operators and or (xor not) in logicOperation ?

Is LOGIC_CONDITION_LOW and LOGIC_CONDITION_HIGH really needed. can be use LOGIC_CONDITION_GREATER_THAN and LOGIC_CONDITION_LOWER_THAN instead

[DzikuVx]

we can bump the number of logic conditions without problem. Only F3 suffer from low RAM and it's not enabled on F3 either way. So yes, we can bump it to 16 without any problems

[DzikuVx]

true > true is false
true == false is false

now that you mention it, AND and OR are missing. They can be easily added.

Let me make a PR for that too

[hali9]

So LOGIC_CONDITION_EQUAL true == false can work like xor

[DzikuVx]

Looks like. But indeed AND OR NOT and XOR operators are a way to go

[hali9]

@DzikuVx Thank for Your cooperation.

[DzikuVx]

@hali9 my pleasure