Skip to content

[Snyk] Security upgrade webpack-dev-server from 3.2.1 to 4.0.0#148

Closed
saxenakshitiz wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-1798f63aaeaac0b63137195374082740
Closed

[Snyk] Security upgrade webpack-dev-server from 3.2.1 to 4.0.0#148
saxenakshitiz wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
snyk-fix-1798f63aaeaac0b63137195374082740

Conversation

@saxenakshitiz
Copy link

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • pinot-controller/src/main/resources/package.json
    • pinot-controller/src/main/resources/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: webpack-dev-server The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.

…ler/src/main/resources/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-ANSIREGEX-1583908
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 13, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #148 (d157037) into master (91c2ebb) will decrease coverage by 1.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #148      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     70.80%   69.76%   -1.05%     
+ Complexity     4255     4254       -1     
============================================
  Files          1636     1636              
  Lines         85804    85804              
  Branches      12920    12920              
============================================
- Hits          60756    59859     -897     
- Misses        20855    21789     +934     
+ Partials       4193     4156      -37     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration1 28.94% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️
integration2 ?
unittests1 66.90% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
unittests2 14.18% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...apache/pinot/common/helix/ExtraInstanceConfig.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...t/core/plan/StreamingInstanceResponsePlanNode.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...ore/operator/streaming/StreamingResponseUtils.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...ager/realtime/PeerSchemeSplitSegmentCommitter.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%) ⬇️
...he/pinot/core/plan/StreamingSelectionPlanNode.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-88.89%) ⬇️
...ator/streaming/StreamingSelectionOnlyOperator.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-87.81%) ⬇️
...re/query/reduce/SelectionOnlyStreamingReducer.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-85.72%) ⬇️
...pache/pinot/common/utils/grpc/GrpcQueryClient.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-80.86%) ⬇️
...ller/api/access/BasicAuthAccessControlFactory.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-80.00%) ⬇️
...roker/requesthandler/GrpcBrokerRequestHandler.java 0.00% <0.00%> (-78.58%) ⬇️
... and 84 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 91c2ebb...d157037. Read the comment docs.

@laxmanchekka laxmanchekka deleted the snyk-fix-1798f63aaeaac0b63137195374082740 branch March 1, 2023 15:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants