Update Rust crate indicatif to v0.18.0

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
indicatif	workspace.dependencies	minor	=0.17.11 -> =0.18.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

console-rs/indicatif (indicatif)

v0.18.0

Compare Source

Unfortunately 0.17.12 had to be yanked because the console upgrade was a semver-incompatible change. Rerelease as 0.18.0 instead.

What's Changed

• Bump version to 0.18.0 by @​djc in https://github.com/console-rs/indicatif/pull/715

v0.17.12

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Add ProgressBar::force_draw by @​jaheba in https://github.com/console-rs/indicatif/pull/689
• Use width to truncate HumanFloatCount values by @​ReagentX in https://github.com/console-rs/indicatif/pull/696
• ProgressStyle enable/disable colors based on draw target by @​tonywu6 in https://github.com/console-rs/indicatif/pull/699
• Switch dep number_prefix to unit_prefix by @​kimono-koans in https://github.com/console-rs/indicatif/pull/709
• draw_target: inline the format arg to silence clippy by @​chris-laplante in https://github.com/console-rs/indicatif/pull/711
• Upgrade to console 0.16 by @​djc in https://github.com/console-rs/indicatif/pull/712

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[hash-worker]

⚠️ Artifact update problem

Renovate failed to update an artifact related to this branch. You probably do not want to merge this PR as-is.

♻ Renovate will retry this branch, including artifacts, only when one of the following happens:

• any of the package files in this branch needs updating, or
• the branch becomes conflicted, or
• you click the rebase/retry checkbox if found above, or
• you rename this PR's title to start with "rebase!" to trigger it manually

The artifact failure details are included below:

File name: Cargo.lock

Command failed: cargo update --config net.git-fetch-with-cli=true --manifest-path Cargo.toml --package indicatif@0.17.11 --precise 0.18.0
    Updating crates.io index
error: failed to select a version for the requirement `indicatif = "^0.17.9"`
candidate versions found which didn't match: 0.18.0
location searched: crates.io index
required by package `tracing-indicatif v0.3.9`
    ... which satisfies dependency `tracing-indicatif = "=0.3.9"` (locked to 0.3.9) of package `hashql-compiletest v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/hashql/compiletest)`
    ... which satisfies path dependency `hashql-compiletest` (locked to 0.0.0) of package `hashql-ast v0.0.0 (/tmp/renovate/repos/github/hashintel/hash/libs/@local/hashql/ast)`

[TimDiekmann]

Did this in #7605 as Renovate was not able to merge the PRs.

[hash-worker]

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update (=0.18.0). You will get a PR once a newer version is released. To ignore this dependency forever, add it to the ignoreDeps array of your Renovate config.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.81%. Comparing base (444b16e) to head (d6ea6c7).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7622   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.81%   52.81%           
=======================================
  Files        1108     1108           
  Lines       99108    99108           
  Branches     4519     4519           
=======================================
+ Hits        52341    52342    +1     
+ Misses      45783    45782    -1     
  Partials      984      984           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	35.85% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.68% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	83.94% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	95.83% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	91.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	75.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	3.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	34.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	19.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	32.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	50.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	97.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.323 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.645 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$29.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 263 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-24.372 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 282 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$28.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.459 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$29.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.997 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-23.584 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-25.336 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$21.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-24.290 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$14.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 58.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-10.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 73.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 62.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.60 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$13.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 65.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$56.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.221 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.49 \mathrm{s} \pm 543 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1432 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 362 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.50 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$243 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.4 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.239 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$68.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 702 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.77 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 59.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$17.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 126 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.281 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$255 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.59 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.044 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$231 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.44 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.324 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$277 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.82 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.300 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$191 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.36 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.53 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$244 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.11 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.307 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$250 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.21 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 946 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.887 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$150 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$99.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.03 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.147 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$117 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.18 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-3.903 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 806 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.409 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph