Update Rust crate tracing-indicatif to v0.3.11

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
tracing-indicatif	workspace.dependencies	patch	=0.3.9 -> =0.3.11

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

emersonford/tracing-indicatif (tracing-indicatif)

v0.3.11

Compare Source

• make IndicatifWriter::new pub
• upgrade to edition 2024

v0.3.10

Compare Source

• update indicatif to 0.18 (#​18)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 52.81%. Comparing base (444b16e) to head (07d0238).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7605   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   52.81%   52.81%           
=======================================
  Files        1108     1108           
  Lines       99108    99108           
  Branches     4519     4519           
=======================================
+ Hits        52341    52343    +2     
+ Misses      45783    45782    -1     
+ Partials      984      983    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.32% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	35.85% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	3.68% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	89.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	83.94% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	95.84% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
rust.harpc-tower	66.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	91.62% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	75.14% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	3.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	34.17% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	19.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	32.56% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	48.22% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	86.09% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	51.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	81.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	50.24% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	71.42% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	85.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.15% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	97.93% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[hash-worker]

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$29.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 291 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 295 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.644 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.318 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 329 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 335 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.71 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 324 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.720 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$29.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 326 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.649 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$27.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}19.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$14.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.743 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 67.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.047 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 63.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.638 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$56.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.937 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.33 \mathrm{s} \pm 599 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}1329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$74.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.279 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.04 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-43.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$69.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 798 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 90.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.498 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.201 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$14.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 41.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.200 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$280 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.28 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}6.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$237 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.64 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-1.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$289 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.45 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}3.24 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$192 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.61 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.845 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$252 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.77 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$261 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.67 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.41 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.96 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.020 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$154 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.79 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$99.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.17 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 664 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.502 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$124 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.01 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.778 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph