Skip to content

Conversation

kucukaslan
Copy link

@kucukaslan kucukaslan commented Sep 14, 2025

I noticed this with IDE warning:

Exported function with the unexported return type

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Internal service construction updated to return an abstract interface rather than a concrete type to improve modularity.
    • No changes to user-facing behavior or UI; functionality remains unchanged.
    • No action required from users.

Copy link

welcome bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Thanks for opening this pull request! 🎉 Please check out our contributing guidelines.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 14, 2025

Walkthrough

The constructor NewProductService in hexagonal/service/logic.go now returns the interface type domain.Service instead of the concrete type *service. The implementation still instantiates a *service; only the exported function signature changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Service API surface
hexagonal/service/logic.go
Updated constructor signature from func NewProductService(productRepo domain.Repository) *service to func NewProductService(productRepo domain.Repository) domain.Service; internal construction of *service unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

I nudge my nose at interfaces bright,
From concrete burrows to abstract light—
A quiet swap, the code stays the same,
New signature, old heart, still in the game.
🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly and accurately summarizes the primary change: making NewProductService return the exported Service interface instead of the unexported concrete service type; this directly matches the updated function signature and the stated PR objective to resolve the IDE warning, and it is specific and readable for repository history.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @kucukaslan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the NewProductService function to return a domain.Service interface rather than a concrete, unexported *service type. This modification enhances the API's design by adhering to Go's principle of 'accept interfaces, return structs', resolves an IDE warning about exposing unexported types, and promotes greater flexibility and testability within the codebase.

Highlights

  • API Refinement: The NewProductService function now returns the domain.Service interface instead of the private *service concrete type, improving the public API.
  • IDE Warning Resolution: This change directly addresses an IDE warning regarding exported functions returning unexported types, aligning with Go's best practices.
  • Improved Abstraction: By returning an interface, the service's implementation details are hidden, promoting better abstraction and easier testing through mock implementations.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly changes the return type of the NewProductService function from the unexported *service struct to the exported domain.Service interface. This is an excellent improvement that aligns with Go best practices for encapsulation and dependency inversion by hiding implementation details from consumers of the service. The change effectively resolves the 'Exported function with the unexported return type' warning. The change is correct and I have no further suggestions for the modified code.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
hexagonal/service/logic.go (3)

9-12: Make the GoDoc comment Go‑idiomatic and precise.

Start the sentence with the identifier and end with a period.

-// NewProductService a service struct that attaches to a repository via the Repository interface
+// NewProductService returns a domain.Service backed by the provided domain.Repository.

10-12: Add a compile‑time interface assertion.

This guards against accidental interface drift when domain.Service changes.

Place near the type declaration:

var _ domain.Service = (*service)(nil)

10-12: Optional: defend against a nil repository (or document the precondition).

If productRepo is nil, later calls will panic at runtime when invoking methods on a nil interface value. Either document the requirement or fail fast.

Minimal guard:

 func NewProductService(productRepo domain.Repository) domain.Service {
+  if productRepo == nil {
+    panic("service: productRepo must not be nil")
+  }
   return &service{productRepo: productRepo}
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 734c7ec and 8415e53.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • hexagonal/service/logic.go (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
hexagonal/service/logic.go (1)
clean-architecture/pkg/book/repository.go (1)
  • Repository (16-21)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
hexagonal/service/logic.go (1)

10-12: Approve: return interface from constructor

Returning domain.Service is correct — quick scan found domain.Service (hexagonal/domain/service.go), call sites (hexagonal/main.go) consume the interface, and no references or type assertions to *service were found outside hexagonal/service/logic.go.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
hexagonal/service/logic.go (1)

9-10: Consider guarding against nil repository (or document it)

Either document the precondition or add a nil check.

  • If documenting only (no code change), update the doc:
-// NewProductService returns a domain.Service backed by the provided domain.Repository.
+// NewProductService returns a domain.Service backed by the provided domain.Repository.
+// Requires a non-nil productRepo.
  • If enforcing, add:
func NewProductService(productRepo domain.Repository) domain.Service {
    if productRepo == nil {
        panic("service.NewProductService: productRepo must not be nil")
    }
    return &service{productRepo: productRepo}
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8415e53 and 67cb4c7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • hexagonal/service/logic.go (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
hexagonal/service/logic.go (2)

9-10: Return interface from constructor — LGTM

Switching NewProductService to return domain.Service fixes the “exported function with unexported return type” warning and aligns with Go API design.


9-10: *No external callers require the concrete service type (service) — returning domain.Service is safe.
Search shows NewProductService is only called in hexagonal/main.go and the only uses of the concrete type are the method receivers in hexagonal/service/logic.go.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant