Attempt to fix danger

[Tyrrrz]

Not 100% sure what exactly is failing currently because the errors lack stacktraces, but looking at the previous version of the file (https://github.com/getsentry/sentry-dotnet/blob/04214d80af1c2be70450cc0c833828bc24ba164e/dangerfile.js) this seems to be the only thing that stands out.

Also can't really test it out until someone external makes a PR :/

#skip-changelog

Fixes #1004

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #1039 (8b23a60) into main (b492d45) will decrease coverage by 1.67%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1039      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.53%   79.85%   -1.68%     
==========================================
  Files         190      190              
  Lines        5967     5967              
  Branches     1469     1469              
==========================================
- Hits         4865     4765     -100     
- Misses        678      788     +110     
+ Partials      424      414      -10     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/Sentry/PlatformAbstractions/FrameworkInfo.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...ntry/PlatformAbstractions/RegistryKeyExtensions.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (-100.00%)	⬇️
...Sentry/PlatformAbstractions/FrameworkInfo.NetFx.cs	0.00% <0.00%> (-71.24%)	⬇️
...rmAbstractions/NetFxInstallationsEventProcessor.cs	4.54% <0.00%> (-68.19%)	⬇️
...ntry/Integrations/NetFxInstallationsIntegration.cs	33.33% <0.00%> (-66.67%)	⬇️
...ntry/PlatformAbstractions/FrameworkInstallation.cs	25.00% <0.00%> (-37.50%)	⬇️
src/Sentry/PlatformAbstractions/RuntimeInfo.cs	53.44% <0.00%> (-5.18%)	⬇️
src/Sentry/Internal/AppDomainAdapter.cs	66.66% <0.00%> (ø)
src/Sentry/Internal/BackgroundWorker.cs	84.93% <0.00%> (+0.68%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b492d45...8b23a60. Read the comment docs.

[lucas-zimerman]

forking the project and making the same PR wouldn't help for testing Danger behavior?

[bruno-garcia]

@lucas-zimerman if I remove you from the repo, yes we can do that to test it out.
Or we can wait for the next external PR