-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 163
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix (rare) wrong result for stabilizer computations #4660
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
38d4cb4
ENHANCE: DescSubgroupsIterator skips outer automorphisms
hulpke 1b58da8
ENHANCE: Missing case in normalform for extensions
hulpke 009b93b
ENHANCE: MaximalAbelianQuotient for subgroup fp quick stop
hulpke b5f17af
ENHANCE: DixonSplit can take matrix number
hulpke 5fa7980
FIX: Generic stabilizer if order known
hulpke File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
# Fix GitHub issue #4659, reported by Daniel Pook-Kolb | ||
gap> p_gens := [PermutationMat((1,2), 6), PermutationMat((1,2,3,4,5,6), 6)];; | ||
gap> p_group := Group(p_gens);; | ||
gap> s1 := DiagonalMat([-1, -1, 1, 1, 1, 1]);; | ||
gap> s_gens := Orbit(p_group, s1);; | ||
gap> ps_gens := Concatenation(p_gens, s_gens);; | ||
gap> ps_group := Group(ps_gens);; | ||
gap> v := [1,2,1,1,0,0];; | ||
gap> orbit := Orbit(ps_group, v);; | ||
gap> Size(ps_group);; | ||
gap> stab := Stabilizer(ps_group, v);; | ||
gap> Size(orbit) * Size(stab) = Size(ps_group); | ||
true |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is never called with the new argument, though, right? So is this for future work, or just for manual invocations by "super expert users"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The latter.