Fixes pre-preocessor directive highlighting

[kgerheiser]

This fixes pre-processor highlighting

[krvajal]

Can you provide an image of the visual difference?

[pedro-ricardo]

@krvajal, this is the preview you asked about this PR

Before:

After:

[krvajal]

What about OpenMP directives. Are they highlighted properly?

[pedro-ricardo]

Nope ... issue #17 isn't corrected here.

It still looks like a comment

Other editors like Kate/Vim/emacs color those as a comments too, so I don't have any reference to make that rule. I'll ask in the issue for a reference.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #46 into release/1.1.0 will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           release/1.1.0      #46   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage          13.21%   13.21%           
==============================================
  Files                  9        9           
  Lines                348      348           
  Branches              49       49           
==============================================
  Hits                  46       46           
  Misses               302      302

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 69fe9bf...68f393e. Read the comment docs.