Agents protocol refactor #4874
Merged
Agents protocol refactor #4874
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Haytham Abuelfutuh <haytham@afutuh.com>
Signed-off-by: Haytham Abuelfutuh <haytham@afutuh.com>
Signed-off-by: Haytham Abuelfutuh <haytham@afutuh.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:XXL
Codecov ReportAttention:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #4874 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 58.93% 58.97% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 645 645
Lines 55394 55506 +112
==========================================
+ Hits 32645 32732 +87
- Misses 20168 20174 +6
- Partials 2581 2600 +19
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
Hi, @pingsutw @EngHabu
maybe we can use
will we use
I'd like to help review this PR, and this is a really useful reference I am reading to understand your implementation. |
|
@Future-Outlier This PR is still WIP and not ready for review.
It's not being used anywhere. we can add it back once we need it. |
Thank you |
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Su <pingsutw@gmail.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 18, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-rliu
pushed a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 24, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
3 tasks
ddl-rliu
pushed a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-rliu
pushed a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 8, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 9, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 16, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-ebrown
added a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-rliu
pushed a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-rliu
pushed a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com>
ddl-rliu
pushed a commit
to dominodatalab/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 12, 2024
- The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com> Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com>
eapolinario
pushed a commit
to flyteorg/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 26, 2024
* Propagate custom_info Dict through agent Resource - The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR #2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com> Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> * Fix test Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> --------- Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com> Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> Co-authored-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com>
otarabai
pushed a commit
to otarabai/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2024
* Propagate custom_info Dict through agent Resource - The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR flyteorg#2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com> Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> * Fix test Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> --------- Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com> Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> Co-authored-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com>
kumare3
pushed a commit
to flyteorg/flytekit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2024
* Propagate custom_info Dict through agent Resource - The agent defines a Resource return type with values: * outputs * message * log_links * phase These are all a part of the underlying protobuf contract defined in flyteidl. However, the message field custom_info from the protobuf is not here google.protobuf.Struct custom_info https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/blob/519080b6e4e53fc0e216b5715ad9b5b5270f35c0/flyteidl/protos/flyteidl/admin/agent.proto#L140 This field was added in flyteorg/flyte#4874 but never made it into the corresponding flytekit PR #2146 - It's useful for agents to return additional metadata about the job, and it looks like custom_info is the intended location - Make a minor refactor to how the agent responds to requests that return Resource by implementing to_flyte_idl / from_flyte_idl directly Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com> Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> * Fix test Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> --------- Signed-off-by: ddl-ebrown <ethan.brown@dominodatalab.com> Signed-off-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com> Co-authored-by: ddl-rliu <richard.liu@dominodatalab.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tracking issue
#3936
Why are the changes needed?
Add ExecuteTaskSync to support running tasks synchronously
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Proto updates
rpc ExecuteTaskSync, which sends the streaming request and gets the streaming responseGetTaskLogsreturns a streaming responsestring deprecated_task_type, and useTaskType task_typeinsteadAdd syncAgentClient to the agent plugin.
How was this patch tested?
unit tests/sandbox
Setup process
Screenshots
Check all the applicable boxes
Related PRs
flyteorg/flytekit#2146
Docs link
NA