-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Common Pitfalls
Garot Conklin edited this page Dec 8, 2024
·
1 revision
This document contrasts common AI collaboration pitfalls with our successful approach from the fleXRP project, demonstrating how proper preparation and partnership leads to better outcomes.
❌ Throwing requirements at AI without context:
"Write me a payment processing system"
"Create a Discord bot"
"Fix this code"✅ Providing comprehensive context and clear requirements:
"We're building a payment gateway for XRP that needs to:
- Handle secure transactions
- Provide instant settlement
- Scale efficiently
- Meet financial regulations
Here's our current architecture..."❌ Assuming AI understands without context:
- No project background provided
- Missing technical constraints
- Unclear quality requirements
- Undefined standards✅ Clear context and expertise sharing:
"With my 20 years of tech experience, I understand:
- System architecture
- Problem decomposition
- Quality requirements
But need help with:
- Code implementation
- Technical patterns
- Best practices"❌ Working without documentation:
- Lost context between sessions
- Inconsistent approaches
- Repeated explanations
- No reference points✅ Documentation-first methodology:
- Comprehensive wiki structure
- Clear reference points
- Living documentation
- Session bridging❌ Prioritizing speed over quality:
"Just make it work"
"We'll fix it later"
"Skip the documentation"
"Ignore best practices"✅ Quality-focused development:
"This needs to be production-ready:
- Secure implementation
- Proper error handling
- Comprehensive testing
- Clear documentation"❌ Treating each task independently:
- No pattern recognition
- Inconsistent approaches
- Redundant solutions
- Lost knowledge✅ Pattern-based development:
- Reusable patterns
- Consistent approaches
- Knowledge building
- Pattern documentation❌ Misunderstanding AI capabilities:
- Expecting AI to make business decisions
- Not providing necessary context
- Unclear responsibility division
- Inefficient collaboration✅ Clear role definition:
Human Role:
- System design
- Business requirements
- Quality standards
- Problem decomposition
AI Role:
- Code implementation
- Technical patterns
- Documentation structure
- Best practices❌ Failing to build on experience:
- Repeating mistakes
- Not documenting lessons
- Ignoring patterns
- Starting from scratch✅ Continuous improvement:
- Document successes
- Learn from failures
- Build pattern library
- Share knowledgeBuilding a complex payment gateway with:
- Limited coding expertise
- High security requirements
- Complex integrations
- Strict quality standardsOur Approach:
1. Clear role definition
2. Comprehensive documentation
3. Pattern recognition
4. Quality focus
5. Continuous learning
Results:
- Successful payment gateway
- Maintainable codebase
- Clear documentation
- Reusable patternsChallenge: Complex financial systems
Solution: Break down into manageable components
Result: Clear, maintainable implementationChallenge: Limited coding expertise
Solution: Leverage AI's technical knowledge
Result: Production-quality codeChallenge: Maintaining project context
Solution: Comprehensive documentation
Result: Consistent development- Provide clear context
- Define requirements
- Establish standards
- Document approach- Follow patterns
- Maintain quality
- Document progress
- Build knowledge- Validate solutions
- Document lessons
- Update patterns
- Share knowledgeShare your experiences:
- What pitfalls have you encountered?
- How did you overcome them?
- What patterns worked best?
This documentation is maintained by the fleXRP team and is based on real-world experience building the fleXRP project.
Home | Documentation | Contributing | Support
Terms • Privacy • Security • Releases
© 2025 fleXRPL. All rights reserved. | Built with ❤️ by fleXRPL Team