Skip to content

Gigasecond: Schema Compliance #679

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 10, 2017

Conversation

kotp
Copy link
Member

@kotp kotp commented Mar 10, 2017

ref: #625

"some languages demonstrate the add function by inviting the",
"solver to include their birthdate in either the solution code",
"or test program. The test program then shows or tests their",
"gigasecond anniversay."
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

*anniversary

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah... saw that... not a compliance change though... so I left it. I guess it wouldn't hurt...

Copy link
Member

@tejasbubane tejasbubane left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! One small typo in "comments".

@kotp kotp force-pushed the gigasecond_make-exercise-schema-compliant branch from 98e4ce9 to 614a9b5 Compare March 10, 2017 09:41
@kotp kotp merged commit ad22547 into master Mar 10, 2017
"cases": [
{
"add":
{
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't merge it yet. It certainly isn't compliant!

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Too late!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rbasso Shall I revert?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure if it is needed. We can add another commit soon.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is why we need #658

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm... yeah, I did check the travis-ci result, it was passing the local test... revert it, and let's see what I missed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This one was trick. It needed:

  • Descriptions for each test case - ☑️
  • Properties for each test case (I would have used add instead of integer) ☑️
  • Transforming the list of strings in the group description in a single string. ❌ (you did it, but you changed it to a comment.
  • Remove the add object. ❌

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done. please check #685

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did check the travis-ci result, it was passing the local test

This link can be used to verify schema compliance until #658 is merged.

Copy link
Member Author

@kotp kotp Mar 10, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I verified what happened locally, I did stash, changed my local $EXERCISE value to review a different exercise, and verified it, merged it, grabbed the changes, went back to my branch, rebased it on master, unstashed my changes, forgot to reassign my exercise environment variable and then had it pass... of course...

So process error.

@kotp kotp deleted the gigasecond_make-exercise-schema-compliant branch March 10, 2017 10:11
@kotp kotp restored the gigasecond_make-exercise-schema-compliant branch March 10, 2017 10:26
@kotp kotp deleted the gigasecond_make-exercise-schema-compliant branch March 10, 2017 10:55
emcoding pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
Remove leading 'x' from repository name
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants