Skip to content

Conversation

@cafreeman
Copy link
Contributor

@cafreeman cafreeman commented Jan 11, 2022

The current blueprints test suite covers cases for both octane and non-octane blueprints, even though non-octane blueprints are no longer supported. As a result, this PR to upgrade ember-cli to 4.1.0 is blocked because all of the non-octane blueprint tests fail (since the CLI no longer generates non-Octane files).

This PR unblocks the ember-CLI upgrades by removing all of the non-Octane blueprint tests. In addition, it also removes all of the pre-Octane blueprints and fixtures since they are no longer supported and can't be generated in the current version of Ember CLI.

@cafreeman cafreeman force-pushed the cfreeman/remove-non-octane-blueprint-tests branch from f273ca9 to 2fcb059 Compare January 11, 2022 22:45
@cafreeman cafreeman force-pushed the cfreeman/remove-non-octane-blueprint-tests branch 2 times, most recently from 85a184a to e550b7d Compare January 11, 2022 23:28
@cafreeman cafreeman force-pushed the cfreeman/remove-non-octane-blueprint-tests branch from e550b7d to 4602942 Compare January 11, 2022 23:33
expect(_file('app/components/x-foo.js')).to.equal(fixture('component/component-dash.js'));
});
// classic default
it('component-class foo --component-structure=classic --component-class=@ember/component', function () {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you double check what the RFC says RE: "--component-structure=classic"? I think we probably don't need that flag value anymore...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For anyone referencing this later, after discussing with @rwjblue we decided this would be fine in a separate PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants