Skip to content

Closes #3251. Rename levenstein to levenshtein. #3264

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2018

Conversation

codebrain
Copy link
Contributor

Unsure if we should rename the enumeration value at this stage as it would break binary compatibility.

Potentially consider implementing another enumeration value with the correct spelling? @russcam - thoughts?

Copy link
Member

@Mpdreamz Mpdreamz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to renaming the enum in master and adding it as an additional enum value in the backport while obsoleting the misspelled variant.

@codebrain codebrain merged commit a7ede8c into master May 31, 2018
@codebrain codebrain deleted the feature/levenshtein branch May 31, 2018 06:08
@codebrain
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ported to 6.x

@russcam
Copy link
Contributor

russcam commented May 31, 2018

@Mpdreamz
Copy link
Member

Think this was merged to soon, should still rename the enum in master IMO.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants