Fixing DST bug in data_nanos support (#1943) #1948
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
In elastic#1803 we added support for the data_nanos Elasticsearch field type. However there is a bug in that sets the zone offset to the offset right now, as opposed to what the zone offset was at the time of the date. So for example if the date was 2015-01-01T06:10:30.123456789-06:00, then if you read that date after daylight saving had begun you would see it as 2015-01-01T06:10:30.123456789-05:00.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In #1803 we added support for the data_nanos Elasticsearch field type. However there is a bug in that sets the zone offset to the offset right now, as opposed to what the zone offset was at the time of the date. So for example if the date was 2015-01-01T06:10:30.123456789-06:00, then if you read that date after daylight saving had begun you would see it as 2015-01-01T06:10:30.123456789-05:00.