Skip to content

Conversation

@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod
Copy link
Contributor

Updates references to the new release 9.1.1.

Merge after the release 9.1.0.

@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 26, 2025 13:30
@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod bot added Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team release labels Jun 26, 2025
@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod bot requested review from pchila and swiatekm and removed request for a team June 26, 2025 13:30
@elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod elastic-vault-github-plugin-prod bot added Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team release labels Jun 26, 2025
pierrehilbert
pierrehilbert previously approved these changes Jun 27, 2025
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 14, 2025

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b update-version-next-9.1.1 upstream/update-version-next-9.1.1
git merge upstream/9.1
git push upstream update-version-next-9.1.1

@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis force-pushed the update-version-next-9.1.1 branch from ecc341d to fcc117e Compare July 14, 2025 07:51
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 14, 2025

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b update-version-next-9.1.1 upstream/update-version-next-9.1.1
git merge upstream/9.1
git push upstream update-version-next-9.1.1

@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis force-pushed the update-version-next-9.1.1 branch from fcc117e to 45a8424 Compare July 14, 2025 11:39
@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis requested a review from a team as a code owner July 14, 2025 11:39
swiatekm
swiatekm previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
rogercoll
rogercoll previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
pchila
pchila previously approved these changes Jul 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@pchila pchila left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM
Thank you @pkoutsovasilis for fixing the build

@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis dismissed stale reviews from pchila, rogercoll, and swiatekm via 1b2107f July 15, 2025 09:27
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 20, 2025

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b update-version-next-9.1.1 upstream/update-version-next-9.1.1
git merge upstream/9.1
git push upstream update-version-next-9.1.1

swiatekm
swiatekm previously approved these changes Jul 21, 2025
pchila
pchila previously approved these changes Jul 22, 2025
@mergify
Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jul 26, 2025

This pull request is now in conflicts. Could you fix it? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you can check out it locally. See documentation: https://help.github.com/articles/checking-out-pull-requests-locally/

git fetch upstream
git checkout -b update-version-next-9.1.1 upstream/update-version-next-9.1.1
git merge upstream/9.1
git push upstream update-version-next-9.1.1

@pchila pchila dismissed stale reviews from swiatekm and themself via d59e181 July 28, 2025 10:03
@pchila
Copy link
Member

pchila commented Jul 28, 2025

@pkoutsovasilis @v1v could you please have a look at my conflict resolution from upstream/9.1 here ---> d59e181

@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis force-pushed the update-version-next-9.1.1 branch from d59e181 to 920b0b7 Compare July 28, 2025 10:35
@pkoutsovasilis
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the ping @pchila I did rebased that to 9.1 because I saw some changes to the VM images which I think shouldn't be part of this PR 🙂

pchila
pchila previously approved these changes Jul 28, 2025
swiatekm
swiatekm previously approved these changes Jul 28, 2025
@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis dismissed stale reviews from swiatekm and pchila via 23ece04 July 28, 2025 21:37
@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis force-pushed the update-version-next-9.1.1 branch from 920b0b7 to 23ece04 Compare July 28, 2025 21:37
Copy link
Contributor

@pkoutsovasilis pkoutsovasilis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@ebeahan @pierrehilbert this LGTM, just a reminder, a review from observablt-ci and observablt-ci-contractors is not actually needed, you may proceed without it 🙂

@swiatekm swiatekm self-requested a review July 29, 2025 11:17
@elastic-sonarqube
Copy link

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

History

cc @elasticmachine

@ebeahan ebeahan merged commit 490dbb2 into 9.1 Aug 1, 2025
19 checks passed
@ebeahan ebeahan deleted the update-version-next-9.1.1 branch August 1, 2025 05:42
@pkoutsovasilis
Copy link
Contributor

Draft PR that removes agent version pinning to be merged as soon as CI is green #9223 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release skip-changelog Team:Automation Label for the Observability productivity team

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants