Skip to content

Conversation

@adpopescu
Copy link
Contributor

@adpopescu adpopescu commented Dec 8, 2025

This change add a new api for a unique cycle ID. This should set the ID
consistently for use throughout the entirety of the cycle. Also moving
GC count to be incremented just before cycle start to be consistent with
how it's now being done in OMR see
eclipse-omr/omr#8065

@adpopescu
Copy link
Contributor Author

adpopescu commented Dec 8, 2025

@amicic This is the GC parts split off from this PR: #22553
Please review

@adpopescu
Copy link
Contributor Author

adpopescu commented Dec 8, 2025

closed wrong PR...

@amicic amicic added the comp:gc label Dec 8, 2025
@adpopescu adpopescu force-pushed the gc-unique-ids branch 2 times, most recently from 6cabc34 to 844acb4 Compare December 8, 2025 20:33
@amicic
Copy link
Contributor

amicic commented Dec 8, 2025

Looks ok. Let's just be a bit more specific in the PR comment.

Instead of Also fixing some of the counts associated with GC cycles. you can say that gcCount is incremented just before cycle start what is consistent with how it's done in OMR (and you can even refer to the OMR PR).

@adpopescu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks ok. Let's just be a bit more specific in the PR comment.

Instead of Also fixing some of the counts associated with GC cycles. you can say that gcCount is incremented just before cycle start what is consistent with how it's done in OMR (and you can even refer to the OMR PR).

Changed comment.

@adpopescu adpopescu force-pushed the gc-unique-ids branch 2 times, most recently from 597b0da to 4f05ec6 Compare December 10, 2025 17:20
@adpopescu adpopescu requested a review from amicic December 10, 2025 17:21
@adpopescu adpopescu force-pushed the gc-unique-ids branch 2 times, most recently from e77f523 to 5c0f3ca Compare December 10, 2025 21:36
This change add a new api for a unique cycle ID. This should set the ID
consistently for use throughout the entirety of the cycle. Also moving
GC count to be incremented just before cycle start to be consistent with
 how it's now being done in OMR see
 eclipse-omr/omr#8065

Signed-off-by: Adrian Popescu <adpopescu@ibm.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants