{vis}[GCCcore/11.2.0] jbigkit v2.1 + add missing header file to older versions

[SebastianAchilles]

(created using eb --new-pr)

[SebastianAchilles]

Test report by @SebastianAchilles
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
rocky8-eb - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6900K CPU @ 3.20GHz (broadwell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/f718084c440339d479e69a0a29a67ce0 for a full test report.

[SebastianAchilles]

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@SebastianAchilles: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14081 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14081 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 7014

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 931639914 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/0c63e52a74357641d43459275df3306b for a full test report.

[smoors]

@SebastianAchilles there is an issue with all jbigkit-2.1installations, discovered while testing libtiff PR #14079.
LibTIFF does not pick up jbigkit because of a missing header file 'libjbig/jbig_ar.h', that is not copied to the installdir.

[smoors]

@boegelbot: please test @ generoso

[boegelbot]

@smoors: Request for testing this PR well received on login1

PR test command 'EB_PR=14081 EB_ARGS= /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_14081 --ntasks=4 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_generoso.sh' executed!

• exit code: 0
• output:

Submitted batch job 7031

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 933001665 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

[boegelbot]

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 5 out of 5 (5 easyconfigs in total)
cnx1 - Linux rocky linux 8.4, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz (haswell), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/cf437ae13e52b1ccd65f401aed37821a for a full test report.

[smoors]

lgtm

[smoors]

Going in, thanks @SebastianAchilles!