Skip to content

Use the regular build scripts for -vs coreclr.sln #114511

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 11, 2025

Conversation

jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member

This fixes an issue with passing the RID in for cDAC and also removes one more direct usage of build-runtime.cmd

This fixes an issue with passing the RID in for cDAC and also removes one more direct usage of build-runtime.cmd
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 10, 2025 23:21
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • eng/build.ps1: Language not supported

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 10, 2025
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky removed the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 10, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @hoyosjs
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Copy link
Member

@kunalspathak kunalspathak left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, as long as you have already verified creation of coreclr.sln scenario.

@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky merged commit 696c8b0 into main Apr 11, 2025
150 of 153 checks passed
@saucecontrol
Copy link
Member

Does this also resolve #113708? I've been using an old CoreClr.sln for a while because I can't generate a new one.

@jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member Author

I tested it locally and it worked for me, so I think so.

@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky deleted the jkoritzinsky-patch-1 branch April 11, 2025 19:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants