Update TaskAwaiter.xml

[JimDaly]

@stephentoub

Per comments in #7941 , removing remarks that say 'This type and its' members are intended for compiler use...

At this point, the right thing for TaskAwaiter and TaskAwaiter<T> is probably to just strike those sentence from the docs, though some extra verbiage around the distinction from Task.Wait would be welcome

See also related PR #7968

[dnfadmin]

All CLA requirements met.

[opbld31]

Docs Build status updates of commit 34a770f:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System.Runtime.CompilerServices/TaskAwaiter.xml	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

[JimDaly]

@gewarren
Seems like the changes I've applied to remove the remarks haven't removed the text 'This API supports the product infrastructure and is not intended to be used directly from your code.' which is still found in the preview: https://review.docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.runtime.compilerservices.taskawaiter
Not clear how that would be removed. Can you help?

[gewarren]

Do we need to update TaskAwaiter<T> as well?

[opbld31]

Docs Build status updates of commit fd038a8:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System.Runtime.CompilerServices/TaskAwaiter.xml	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

[gewarren]

This looks good to me. Are you planning to update TaskAwaiter<T> as well?

[opbld30]

Docs Build status updates of commit 268b9dd:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System.Runtime.CompilerServices/TaskAwaiter.xml	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

[JimDaly]

This looks good to me. Are you planning to update TaskAwaiter<T> as well?

Yes, I did in a separate PR

[opbld34]

Docs Build status updates of commit ce74628:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System.Runtime.CompilerServices/TaskAwaiter.xml	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

[gewarren]

Closing in favor of #7968.