Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backup types #4514

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 8, 2020
Merged

Backup types #4514

merged 6 commits into from
Jan 8, 2020

Conversation

martinmr
Copy link
Contributor

@martinmr martinmr commented Jan 7, 2020

Types were not being properly backed up. This PR fixes the bug and changes the test to verify types and predicates appear in the restored backup.

Fixes #4507


This change is Reviewable

@martinmr martinmr requested review from manishrjain and a team as code owners January 7, 2020 21:30
Copy link
Contributor

@manishrjain manishrjain left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved

@martinmr martinmr merged commit 261ac8e into master Jan 8, 2020
@martinmr martinmr deleted the martinmr/type-backup-test branch January 8, 2020 06:16
danielmai pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2020
Types were not being properly backed up. This PR fixes the bug and changes the test to verify types and predicates appear in the restored backup.

Fixes #4507

(cherry picked from commit 261ac8e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Type definitions potentially not backed up and/or restored properly.
2 participants