Skip to content

Conversation

@jeffwidman
Copy link
Contributor

This makes the API a bit cleaner, and matches the signature of NewSet().

Fix #80

This makes the API a bit cleaner, and matches the signature of `NewSet()`.

Fix #80
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Why does NewSet() take optional elements but NewThreadUnsafeSet() doesn't?

2 participants