Skip to content

Conversation

@dantengsky
Copy link
Member

@dantengsky dantengsky commented Jun 17, 2025

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

This reverts PR #18160, which need to be reviewed further.

Tests

  • Unit Test
  • Logic Test
  • Benchmark Test
  • No Test - revert

Type of change

  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
  • Documentation Update
  • Refactoring
  • Performance Improvement
  • Other (please describe): revert

This change is Reviewable

@dantengsky dantengsky changed the title Revert "fix: transient table no work as expected inside explicit transaction (#18160) chore: Revert "fix: transient table no work as expected inside explicit transaction (#18160) Jun 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the pr-chore this PR only has small changes that no need to record, like coding styles. label Jun 17, 2025
@dantengsky dantengsky changed the title chore: Revert "fix: transient table no work as expected inside explicit transaction (#18160) chore: revert "fix: transient table no work as expected inside explicit transaction (#18160) Jun 17, 2025
@dantengsky dantengsky marked this pull request as ready for review June 17, 2025 04:54
@dantengsky dantengsky requested a review from SkyFan2002 June 17, 2025 04:54
@BohuTANG BohuTANG merged commit b0c1c1e into databendlabs:main Jun 17, 2025
91 of 93 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

pr-chore this PR only has small changes that no need to record, like coding styles.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants