feat(sdk): enable withdrawals v1 in JS SDK #2201
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the flexibility of the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
packages/js-dash-sdk/src/SDK/Client/Platform/methods/identities/creditWithdrawal.ts (1)
39-40: LGTM: Updated function signature and JSDocThe changes to the function signature and JSDoc are consistent with the updated
WithdrawalOptionstype and provide more flexibility for users of the SDK.Consider updating the JSDoc to clarify that
options.toAddressis optional:/** * @param [options.toAddress] - Optional withdrawal destination address */Also applies to: 46-46
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_facade.rs (1)
126-126: Update documentation for the optional output script.To maintain clear and accurate documentation, please update any relevant documentation (including inline comments, method documentation, and external API docs) to reflect that the
output_scriptparameter is now optional.packages/wasm-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (1)
Line range hint
213-231: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling foroutput_script.The changes to
create_identity_credit_withdrawal_transitionlook good and align with the PR objectives. The modification to accept an optionaloutput_scriptincreases flexibility while maintaining backwards compatibility.Consider adding explicit error handling for the
output_scriptconversion:output_script.map(CoreScript::from_bytes).map_err(|e| JsError::new(&format!("Invalid output script: {}", e)).into()),This would provide more specific error information if the
output_scriptis invalid.packages/wasm-dpp/src/identity/identity_facade.rs (2)
209-210: LGTM! Consider updating documentation.The change from
Vec<u8>toOption<Vec<u8>>for theoutput_scriptparameter provides more flexibility in the API, allowing for cases where an output script may not be necessary. This aligns well with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals v1 in the JS SDK.Consider updating the method's documentation to reflect this change, explaining when it's appropriate to provide
Nonefor theoutput_script.
Line range hint
1-283: Consider tracking commented-out methods for future updates.I noticed that several methods (e.g.,
create_from_object,validate) are commented out. While this doesn't affect the current functionality, it might indicate ongoing or planned refactoring of the API.Consider adding TODO comments or creating separate issues to track these commented-out methods. This will help ensure they're not forgotten and can be properly addressed in future updates.
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (1)
Line range hint
237-248: LGTM: Updated create_identity_credit_withdrawal_transition methodThe changes in this method are well-implemented and align with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals v1 in the SDK. Here are the key improvements:
- The
output_scriptparameter is nowOption<CoreScript>, allowing for more flexibility.- The transition structure has been updated to
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionV1.- The assignment of
output_scriptis correct, as it's already anOption<CoreScript>.These changes enhance the functionality of identity credit withdrawals and make the output script handling more flexible.
Consider adding a brief comment above the method signature to explain the purpose of the
Option<CoreScript>foroutput_script, as it might not be immediately clear to other developers why this change was made.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
.yarn/cache/fsevents-patch-19706e7e35-10.zipis excluded by!**/.yarn/**,!**/*.zip
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- packages/js-dash-sdk/src/SDK/Client/Platform/methods/identities/creditWithdrawal.ts (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_facade.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/src/identity/identity_facade.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/js-dash-sdk/src/SDK/Client/Platform/methods/identities/creditWithdrawal.ts (5)
31-32: LGTM: Updated WithdrawalOptions typeThe changes to the
WithdrawalOptionstype align well with the PR objectives. MakingsigningKeyIndexoptional and adding thetoAddressproperty provides more flexibility for users of the SDK.
50-54: LGTM: Improved options initializationThe new approach to initializing options inside the function provides more flexibility while maintaining the default
signingKeyIndexof 3. The use of object spread ensures that user-provided options are respected.
104-104: LGTM: Updated output script usageThe change from
outputScripttooutputScriptBytesis consistent with the new withdrawal address handling logic and provides more flexibility in how the output script is created and used.
Line range hint
1-130: Overall assessment: Well-implemented feature with minor clarifications neededThe changes in this file successfully implement the withdrawal functionality in the JS SDK as per the PR objectives. The implementation provides more flexibility, better error handling, and improved logging.
Key points:
- The
WithdrawalOptionstype and function signature changes offer more flexibility.- The new withdrawal address handling logic includes proper validation.
- The changes are consistent throughout the file and align well with the PR objectives.
There are a few minor suggestions for improvement:
- Consider updating the JSDoc for clarity on optional parameters.
- Clarification is needed on how the withdrawal address is determined when
options.toAddressis not provided.Once these points are addressed, the implementation will be robust and ready for integration.
58-73: Improved withdrawal address handling, but clarification neededThe new logic for handling the withdrawal address provides more flexibility and includes proper validation, which is great. The debug logging is also helpful for troubleshooting.
However, could you please clarify how the withdrawal address is determined when
options.toAddressis not provided? The current implementation only logs a message in this case, but it's not clear how the "recent withdrawal address" is obtained or used.To verify the usage of this function across the codebase and ensure all cases are handled correctly, please run the following script:
This will help us understand how the function is being used and if there are any cases where
toAddressis not provided.✅ Verification successful
Withdrawal address handling verified
No usages of
creditWithdrawalwithout specifyingtoAddresswere found in the codebase. Therefore, the current implementation correctly handles cases whentoAddressis provided, and the else case does not impact existing functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of creditWithdrawal function across the codebase # Test: Find all occurrences of creditWithdrawal function calls rg --type typescript -A 5 'creditWithdrawal\s*\('Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for usage of creditWithdrawal function across the codebase # Test: Find all occurrences of creditWithdrawal function calls with correct type rg --type ts -A 5 'creditWithdrawal\s*\('Length of output: 704
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_facade.rs (1)
126-126: LGTM! Please verify dependent code and implementation.The change to make
output_scriptoptional (Option<CoreScript>) adds flexibility and aligns with the PR objectives. However, please ensure the following:
- Update the implementation of
create_identity_credit_withdrawal_transitioninIdentityFactoryto handle theOption<CoreScript>.- Verify that this change doesn't introduce breaking changes in the SDK or dependent code.
- Update relevant documentation to reflect the new optional nature of the output script.
To verify the impact of this change, please run the following script:
packages/wasm-dpp/src/identity/identity_facade.rs (1)
225-226: LGTM! Consistent implementation with signature change.The implementation correctly handles the new optional
output_scriptparameter. Usingoutput_script.map(CoreScript::from_bytes)ensures thatCoreScript::from_bytesis only called whenoutput_scriptis provided, which is consistent with the method signature change.packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (2)
45-45: LGTM: New import for IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionV1The addition of this import is correct and necessary for using the new version of the transition structure. It aligns with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals v1 in the SDK.
45-45: Summary: Successfully implemented withdrawals v1 in the SDKThe changes in this file successfully implement the withdrawals v1 functionality in the SDK, aligning perfectly with the PR objectives. Key improvements include:
- Added import for
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionV1.- Updated
create_identity_credit_withdrawal_transitionmethod to use the new transition structure.- Made
output_scriptoptional, increasing flexibility in handling credit withdrawals.These changes enhance the functionality of identity credit withdrawals without introducing breaking changes. The implementation is consistent and well-integrated into the existing codebase.
Great job on this implementation! It effectively addresses the need for withdrawal functionality in the JavaScript SDK.
Also applies to: 237-248
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
packages/wasm-dpp/test/unit/identity/stateTransition/IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransition/IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransition.spec.js (1)
112-112: LGTM: Version update consistently applied in JSON representation.The version change to '1' is correctly applied in the JSON representation test, maintaining consistency with the object representation.
Consider adding a test case that explicitly checks the
$versionfield to ensure it's always set to '1':it('should have the correct version', () => { const jsonStateTransition = stateTransition.toJSON(); expect(jsonStateTransition.$version).to.equal('1'); });This additional test would provide explicit coverage for the version field and make the version requirement more visible in the test suite.
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/dpp_versions.rs (1)
30-31: LGTM! Consider adding a doc comment for the new field.The addition of the
credit_withdrawalfield toIdentityTransitionVersionsaligns well with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals. This change introduces support for identity credit withdrawal transitions without breaking existing functionality.Consider adding a doc comment to explain the purpose of this new field, similar to other fields in the struct. For example:
/// Versions related to identity credit withdrawal transitions pub credit_withdrawal: IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersions,packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (2)
1186-1188: Consider versioning strategy and future implications.The addition of
credit_withdrawalwith adefault_constructorof 0 is appropriate for an initial implementation. However, please consider the following points:
- Does this change affect the overall versioning strategy of the platform?
- Are there any plans for future versions of the credit withdrawal functionality that should be considered now?
- How will backwards compatibility be maintained if this structure needs to be updated in the future?
It might be beneficial to add a comment explaining the versioning strategy for this new structure and any considerations for future updates.
Consider adding a comment above the
credit_withdrawalfield to explain its purpose and versioning strategy:identities: IdentityTransitionVersions { // ... (previous fields) + // Credit withdrawal versioning structure. + // Version 0 represents the initial implementation. + // Future versions should maintain backwards compatibility. credit_withdrawal: IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersions { default_constructor: 0, }, },
1186-1188: Ensure proper testing and documentation.The addition of the
credit_withdrawalfield is a significant feature that enables withdrawal functionality. To ensure the robustness and maintainability of this change, please consider the following:
- Have unit tests been added or updated to cover this new functionality?
- Are there integration tests that verify the interaction of this new feature with other components of the system?
- Has the relevant documentation been updated to reflect this new capability, including any API changes or new features exposed to users?
If you need assistance in generating test cases or updating documentation for this new feature, please let me know, and I'd be happy to help or open a GitHub issue to track this task.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/dpp_versions.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v3.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v4.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/lib/test/fixtures/getIdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionFixture.js (1 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/test/unit/identity/stateTransition/IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransition/IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransition.spec.js (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
packages/wasm-dpp/lib/test/fixtures/getIdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionFixture.js (1)
9-9: Approve change, but clarification needed on parameter valueThe update to the
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionconstructor aligns with the PR objective of switching to Identity Credit Withdrawal Transaction V1. However, a few points need attention:
- Could you clarify why '3' is used instead of '1' for what seems to be a V1 transaction?
- Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of this parameter for better maintainability.
To ensure this change doesn't break existing tests, let's verify its usage:
packages/wasm-dpp/test/unit/identity/stateTransition/IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransition/IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransition.spec.js (3)
95-95: LGTM: Consistent version update in signature-less object.The version change to '1' is consistently applied in the test case that skips the signature. This maintains the integrity of the version update across different scenarios.
Line range hint
78-112: Summary: Version updates are consistent and aligned with PR objectives.The changes in this file consistently update the version from '0' to '1' in all relevant test cases, aligning with the PR's goal of enabling withdrawals v1 in the JS SDK. The existing test structure and coverage have been preserved.
To ensure a comprehensive update, please verify that similar version changes have been applied to all relevant files in the codebase:
This will help ensure that the version update has been applied consistently across all relevant parts of the codebase.
78-78: LGTM: Version update aligns with PR objectives.The change from version '0' to '1' is consistent with the PR's goal of enabling withdrawals v1 in the JS SDK. This update correctly reflects the new version in the test case.
To ensure consistency, let's verify that this version change is applied uniformly across the codebase:
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/dpp_versions.rs (2)
30-35: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives and maintain consistencyThe additions to enable identity credit withdrawal transitions are well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. They provide the necessary versioning support for the new feature without introducing breaking changes.
Key points:
- The
credit_withdrawalfield inIdentityTransitionVersionsintroduces support for the new transition type.- The new
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsstruct follows existing patterns for versioning features.These changes successfully lay the groundwork for implementing the withdrawal functionality in the JavaScript SDK, as outlined in the PR objectives.
33-35: LGTM! Consider adding documentation and ensuring consistency.The new
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsstruct is well-structured and aligns with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals. It follows the existing patterns in the file for versioning different features.Consider the following improvements:
- Add a doc comment for the struct to explain its purpose:
/// Versions related to identity credit withdrawal transition features #[derive(Clone, Debug, Default)] pub struct IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersions { // ... }
- Add a doc comment for the
default_constructorfield:/// Version of the default constructor for identity credit withdrawal transitions pub default_constructor: FeatureVersion,
- For consistency with other structs in the file, consider if there are any other fields that might be relevant to credit withdrawal transitions. If not, it's fine to keep it as is, but it's worth considering for future extensibility.
To ensure consistency with other transition types, let's check if they also have a similar structure:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful
The
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsstruct uniquely includes thedefault_constructorfield, consistent with its specific role in enabling withdrawals. No other transition version structs contain this field, ensuring there are no inconsistencies within the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar structures in other transition types # Test: Search for other transition types with a default_constructor field rg --type rust 'struct \w+TransitionVersions' -A 5 | grep 'default_constructor'Length of output: 181
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (2)
1186-1188: LGTM: Addition of credit withdrawal versioning structure.The introduction of the
credit_withdrawalfield withIdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsaligns well with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals in the JS SDK. This change provides a versioning structure for identity credit withdrawal transitions, which is a crucial component for implementing the withdrawal functionality.
1186-1188: Verify integration with related components.While the addition of the
credit_withdrawalfield is consistent with the overall structure, it's important to ensure that this change is properly integrated with other related components. Please verify:
- Are there any other parts of the codebase that need to be updated to work with this new versioning structure?
- Does this change affect any existing functionality related to identities or state transitions?
- Are there any documentation updates required to reflect this new capability?
To help verify the integration, you can run the following script to check for other occurrences of
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsand related terms:✅ Verification successful
Integration Verified Successfully.
The
credit_withdrawalfield is properly integrated across all relevant components and versions within the codebase. All related modules, state transitions, serializers, validators, and tests consistently reference and utilizeIdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsand thecredit_withdrawalfield, ensuring seamless functionality.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for related terms to ensure proper integration echo "Searching for IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersions:" rg "IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersions" echo "\nSearching for credit_withdrawal in relation to identities or state transitions:" rg "credit_withdrawal" -C 5 | rg -e "identities" -e "state_transitions" -C 5 echo "\nSearching for potential related functions or methods:" rg -i "credit.?withdrawal"Length of output: 272320
packages/rs-dpp/src/state_transition/state_transitions/identity/identity_credit_withdrawal_transition/mod.rs (1)
76-79: LGTM: Versioning path updated correctlyThe update in lines 76-79 adjusts the path to access the
default_constructorforcredit_withdrawalwithinPlatformVersion. This change ensures that thedefault_versionedmethod retrieves the correct default version, aligning with the updated platform versioning structure.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v4.rs (2)
10-12: LGTM!The added imports for
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsand related structures are appropriate and necessary for the new withdrawal functionalities.
1188-1190: Verify consistency ofdefault_constructorversion numbers.The
default_constructoris set to1forcredit_withdrawalinIdentityTransitionVersions. Please ensure that this version number aligns with the versioning scheme used throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.Run the following script to check for consistency of
default_constructorversion numbers across allIdentityTransitionVersions:✅ Verification successful
default_constructorVersion Numbers are ConsistentAll instances of
default_constructorinIdentityTransitionVersionsalign with the versioning scheme across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all 'default_constructor' version numbers in 'IdentityTransitionVersions' # Expected result: Consistent version numbers for 'default_constructor' fields rg --type rust 'struct IdentityTransitionVersions' -A 100 | rg 'default_constructor: [0-9]+'Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all instances of 'default_constructor' and verify their context # Search for all 'default_constructor' occurrences in Rust files rg --type rust 'default_constructor' --context 5 # Additionally, search for the 'IdentityTransitionVersions' struct to inspect its definition rg --type rust 'struct IdentityTransitionVersions' --context 10Length of output: 8310
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v3.rs (2)
10-11: Addition ofIdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsto ImportsThe
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionshas been correctly added to the import list, ensuring the new versioning structure is accessible throughout the module.
1193-1195: Proper Integration ofcredit_withdrawalinIdentityTransitionVersionsThe new
credit_withdrawalfield is appropriately added toIdentityTransitionVersions, withdefault_constructorset to1. This addition maintains consistency within the versioning system for identity transitions.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v2_test.rs (1)
1187-1189: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new feature.The addition of
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsis consistent with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals in the JS SDK. This new struct provides versioning support for identity credit withdrawal transitions.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the purpose of this new struct and its
default_constructorfield. This will help other developers understand the feature and its versioning strategy.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (1)
1187-1189: LGTM: Credit withdrawal field added correctly.The
credit_withdrawalfield of typeIdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionshas been appropriately added to theIdentityTransitionVersionsstruct. This addition aligns with the PR objectives to enable withdrawals v1 in the SDK.The
default_constructoris set to 0, which is appropriate for the initial version of this feature.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this field and why the
default_constructoris set to 0. This would be helpful for future developers maintaining this code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v2_test.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (2)
10-12: LGTM: Import addition is correct and well-placed.The
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsimport has been correctly added to the list of imports fromcrate::version::dpp_versions. It's placed in the appropriate alphabetical order within the existing import list, which maintains code organization.
Line range hint
1-1189: Summary: Changes successfully implement identity credit withdrawal support.The modifications to this file are focused and consistent with the PR objectives to enable withdrawals v1 in the SDK. The addition of the
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionVersionsimport and thecredit_withdrawalfield to theIdentityTransitionVersionsstruct are the only changes made to this large configuration file.These changes lay the groundwork for supporting identity credit withdrawals in the platform version definition, which is crucial for the new withdrawal functionality. The initial version (0) set for the
default_constructorsuggests this is the first implementation of this feature.The minimal nature of these changes, confined to the relevant sections of the
TEST_PLATFORM_V3struct, indicates a well-scoped implementation that shouldn't introduce unintended side effects to other parts of the system.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/wasm-dpp/test/integration/identity/IdentityFacade.spec.js (1)
Review skipped tests and versioning TODOs
The verification process identified multiple skipped tests and versioning-related TODO comments in
packages/wasm-dpp/test/integration/identity/IdentityFacade.spec.js. Please review and update them in light of the version change:
#createFromObjectTest
- Skipped Test:
describe.skip('#createFromObject', () => { ... });- TODO Comment:
// TODO(versioning): obsolete?- Action: Determine if this test remains relevant with the new version. If applicable, update and unskip the test to ensure it aligns with current functionality.
#validateTest
- Skipped Test:
describe.skip('#validate', () => { ... });- TODO Comment:
// TODO(versioning): restore- Action: Assess whether this test can now be restored and enabled. Update the test as necessary to reflect any changes introduced by the version update.
Additional TODO Comments and Skipped Tests
- Action: Review all other
TODO(versioning)comments and skipped tests within the file to ensure they are still pertinent. Address each accordingly:
- If a TODO is outdated, consider removing it.
- If a TODO requires action, implement the necessary changes to address it.
- Enable any skipped tests that are relevant and functional with the new version.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-238: Review skipped tests and versioning TODOsGiven the version change in the
DashPlatformProtocolconstructor, it's important to review the skipped tests and versioning-related TODOs in this file. Specifically:
The
createFromObjecttest is skipped with a TODO comment mentioning "versioning: obsolete?". Please review if this test is still relevant or if it can be updated and unskipped with the new version.The
validatetest is skipped with a TODO comment "versioning: restore". Consider if this test can now be restored with the new version.Review all other TODO comments in the file to ensure they are still relevant or if they can be addressed with the new version.
To help identify all skipped tests and versioning-related TODOs, you can run the following script:
This will help you quickly locate areas that might need attention due to the version change.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for skipped tests rg --type js "describe\.skip" -A 3 -B 1 # Search for versioning-related TODOs rg --type js "TODO.*version" -A 3 -B 1Length of output: 72485
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for skipped tests rg --type js "describe\.skip" -A 3 -B 1 # Search for versioning-related TODOs with corrected pattern rg --type js "TODO\(?versioning?\)?" -A 3 -B 1Length of output: 56928
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (1)
251-256: Consider usingmap_errfor more idiomatic error handlingInstead of using
ok_or_elsewith a custom error message, consider usingmap_errfor more idiomatic Rust error handling. This would allow you to directly map theNonecase to yourProtocolError.let output_script = output_script.map_err(|_| { ProtocolError::Generic( "Output script is required for IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionV0".to_string(), ) })?;This change is optional and doesn't affect functionality, but it might be slightly more idiomatic.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/test/integration/identity/IdentityFacade.spec.js (1 hunks)
- packages/wasm-dpp/test/unit/identity/IdentityFactory.spec.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (1)
Learnt from: shumkov PR: dashpay/platform#2201 File: packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs:1186-1188 Timestamp: 2024-10-03T11:51:06.980Z Learning: In the `IdentityTransitionVersions` structure within `packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs`, the field `credit_withdrawal` does not need the `identity_` prefix since it is already encompassed within identity state transitions.
🔇 Additional comments (8)
packages/wasm-dpp/test/integration/identity/IdentityFacade.spec.js (1)
27-27: Verify the impact of DashPlatformProtocol version changeThe version parameter for
DashPlatformProtocolhas been updated from1to3. This change could have significant implications for the test suite and potentially the main code.
- Could you please clarify the reason for this version update?
- Have you verified that this change doesn't break any existing tests or functionality?
- Are there any other files or tests that need to be updated to maintain consistency with this change?
- If this represents a significant version update, please ensure that the relevant documentation is updated to reflect this change.
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following script:
This will help identify other areas of the codebase that might be affected by this version change.
✅ Verification successful
DashPlatformProtocol version update is consistent across test files
The update of the version parameter for
DashPlatformProtocolfrom1to3inIdentityFacade.spec.jsaligns with its usage in other test files. No version-related comments or documentation were found, indicating that the change is consistent and does not introduce any conflicts within the test suite.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of DashPlatformProtocol instantiation rg --type js "new DashPlatformProtocol\(" -A 3 -B 1 # Search for any version-related comments or documentation rg --type js "DashPlatformProtocol.*version" -A 3 -B 1Length of output: 72485
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of DashPlatformProtocol instantiation rg --type js "new DashPlatformProtocol\(" -A 3 -B 1 # Search for any version-related comments or documentation rg --type js "DashPlatformProtocol.*version" -A 3 -B 1Length of output: 12445
packages/wasm-dpp/test/unit/identity/IdentityFactory.spec.js (2)
Line range hint
1-365: Consider addressing TODO comments and skipped tests.There are several TODO comments and skipped tests in this file, particularly related to versioning. For example:
- Line 78:
// TODO(versioning): re-check. Not used anymore- Line 86:
// TODO(versioning): restore- Line 115:
// TODO(versioning): restoreGiven that this PR involves changes related to the Identity Credit Withdrawal Transaction V1, it might be a good opportunity to address some of these TODOs or skipped tests. Could you please review these and determine if any should be addressed as part of this PR or if they should be tracked for future work?
Let's check if there are any recent changes or issues related to these TODOs:
#!/bin/bash # Search for recent commits mentioning versioning TODOs git log -S "TODO(versioning)" --since="1 month ago" # Search for open issues related to versioning gh issue list --search "versioning in:title,body"
29-29: Please clarify the reason for changing theIdentityFactoryconstructor argument.The constructor argument for
IdentityFactoryhas been changed from1to3. Could you provide more context on why this change was made? Is it related to the new withdrawal functionality or a version update?To ensure consistency, let's check for other occurrences of
IdentityFactoryinitialization:✅ Verification successful
Change Verified:
IdentityFactoryconstructor argument update is isolated.
No additional instances ofIdentityFactoryinitialization found in the codebase, ensuring that the change from1to3is localized to the specified test file.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other IdentityFactory initializations rg --type js "new IdentityFactory\(" -A 1Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Correctly search for other IdentityFactory initializations rg --type js "new IdentityFactory\(" -A 1Length of output: 204
packages/rs-dpp/src/identity/identity_factory.rs (5)
46-46: LGTM: New import for IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionV1The import for
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionV1is correctly added and aligns with the PR objective of enabling withdrawals v1 in the SDK.
238-239: LGTM: Updated method signature for flexibilityThe change from
CoreScripttoOption<CoreScript>in the method signature provides more flexibility in the API, allowing for cases where an output script might not be required.
241-289: LGTM: Well-structured version handling logicThe implementation of version-specific logic using pattern matching is clean and follows best practices for handling different versions of the withdrawal transition. The error handling for unknown versions is also appropriate.
Line range hint
1-324: Summary: Changes align with PR objectives and follow best practicesThe modifications to enable withdrawals v1 in the JS SDK have been implemented effectively. The code changes, including the new import and the updates to the
create_identity_credit_withdrawal_transitionmethod, are well-structured and follow Rust best practices. The version handling logic is robust, and the flexibility added to the method signature is a positive change.A few minor suggestions have been made for potential improvements, but these are not critical. It's important to verify the impact of these changes on the rest of the codebase, particularly where this method is called or where
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionis used.Overall, the changes appear to be ready for merging, pending the suggested verifications.
238-292: Verify the impact of these changes on the rest of the codebaseThe changes to the
create_identity_credit_withdrawal_transitionmethod, particularly the change in theoutput_scriptparameter type, may have implications for other parts of the codebase that call this method.Run the following script to check for potential impacts:
Please review the results to ensure that all calls to this method have been updated accordingly and that any code relying on
IdentityCreditWithdrawalTransitionis compatible with both V0 and V1 versions.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
We should be able to withdraw credits with JS SDK
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
With test suite against local network
Breaking Changes
None
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation