feat(platform)!: withdrawal automatic retries after core rejection #2185
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant updates to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant WithdrawalManager
participant DocumentHandler
User->>WithdrawalManager: Initiate withdrawal transaction
WithdrawalManager->>DocumentHandler: Process withdrawal
DocumentHandler->>WithdrawalManager: Check for expired documents
alt Expired documents found
WithdrawalManager->>DocumentHandler: Rebroadcast expired documents
end
WithdrawalManager->>User: Confirm transaction status
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
QuantumExplorer
changed the title
QuantumExplorer
changed the title
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 20
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (70)
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/mod.rs (1)
7-7: LGTM! Consider grouping related modules.The addition of the
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsmodule is appropriate and consistent with the existing structure. It enhances the functionality for handling expired withdrawal documents, which aligns well with the other withdrawal-related modules.Consider grouping related modules together for better code organization. For instance, you could place this new module next to other modules that deal with expired or problematic withdrawals, such as
cleanup_expired_locks_of_withdrawal_amounts. This would improve the readability and logical flow of the module declarations.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/v0/mod.rs (1)
6-14: LGTM: Well-structured method with appropriate encapsulation.The method
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operations_v0is well-implemented:
- It efficiently queues an operation for removing completed broadcasted withdrawal transactions.
- The use of
Vec<WithdrawalTransactionIndex>allows for batch processing.- The
pub(super)visibility appropriately limits the method's scope.Consider adding documentation comments to explain the purpose of the method and its parameters. For example:
/// Queues an operation to remove completed broadcasted withdrawal transactions. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `indexes` - A vector of withdrawal transaction indexes to be removed. /// * `drive_operation_types` - A mutable reference to the vector of drive operations where the new operation will be pushed. pub(super) fn remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operations_v0( &self, indexes: Vec<WithdrawalTransactionIndex>, drive_operation_types: &mut Vec<DriveOperation>, ) { // ... (existing implementation) }packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/v0/mod.rs (1)
7-11: Consider revisiting the versioning strategy.The method name
move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations_v0includes a version number (v0). While this can be useful for managing different versions of an API, it might lead to maintenance challenges in the future. Consider using a more robust versioning strategy, such as:
- Using traits for different versions of the API.
- Employing feature flags for versioning.
- Utilizing separate modules for different versions.
This approach could improve long-term maintainability and make it easier to deprecate old versions in the future.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/mod.rs (2)
11-17: Enhance method documentation for clarity.While the method signature is appropriate, the documentation could be more comprehensive. Consider expanding the comment to include:
- A more detailed description of the method's purpose
- Explanations for each parameter
- Information about the return value and possible errors
Here's a suggested improvement for the documentation:
/// Removes broadcasted withdrawal transactions after their completion. /// /// This method processes a list of withdrawal transaction indexes, removing them from the system /// after they have been successfully broadcasted and completed. /// /// # Parameters /// * `indexes` - A vector of `WithdrawalTransactionIndex` identifying the transactions to be removed. /// * `drive_operation_types` - A mutable reference to a vector of `DriveOperation` to which removal operations will be added. /// * `platform_version` - A reference to `PlatformVersion` used to determine the appropriate implementation version. /// /// # Returns /// A `Result` which is `Ok(())` if the operation succeeds, or an `Error` if there's a problem (e.g., unsupported platform version).
18-39: LGTM: Well-structured version dispatching with room for minor improvements.The version-based dispatching logic is well-implemented, allowing for future extensibility. The error handling for unknown versions is comprehensive. However, consider the following suggestions:
- Extract the long method name into a constant for better readability and maintainability.
- Consider using a
constarray for known versions instead of avec!.Here's a suggested refactoring:
const METHOD_NAME: &str = "remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operations"; const KNOWN_VERSIONS: [u32; 1] = [0]; impl Drive { pub fn remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operations( &self, indexes: Vec<WithdrawalTransactionIndex>, drive_operation_types: &mut Vec<DriveOperation>, platform_version: &PlatformVersion, ) -> Result<(), Error> { match platform_version.drive.methods.identity.withdrawals.transaction.queue .remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operations { 0 => Ok(self.remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operations_v0( indexes, drive_operation_types, )), version => Err(Error::Drive(DriveError::UnknownVersionMismatch { method: METHOD_NAME.to_string(), known_versions: KNOWN_VERSIONS.to_vec(), received: version, })), } } }This refactoring improves readability and makes it easier to update known versions in the future.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/mod.rs (1)
10-43: LGTM: Well-structured implementation with proper version handling.The
move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsfunction is well-implemented with appropriate error handling and version checking. The use of a match statement for version-specific implementations is a good practice.Consider extracting the long method name in the match expression to a constant for better readability:
const METHOD_NAME: &str = "move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations"; match platform_version.drive.methods.identity.withdrawals.transaction.queue.get(METHOD_NAME) { // ... rest of the implementation }This would also make it easier to maintain if the method name changes in the future.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/index/mod.rs (3)
17-17: LGTM. Consider updating documentation forsetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. It suggests that the function now accepts an optional parameter, which could allow for more flexible test setups.Consider updating the documentation for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto reflect this new optional parameter and its purpose. This will help other developers understand how to use this function in different test scenarios.
62-62: LGTM. Consider adding tests with different initial states.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous test and looks good.Given that
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurenow accepts an optional parameter, consider adding additional tests that use different initial states. This could help ensure that the system behaves correctly under various starting conditions. For example:#[test] fn test_withdrawal_transaction_index_with_custom_initial_state() { let custom_initial_state = Some(/* define custom state here */); let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(custom_initial_state); // ... rest of the test }This would increase the robustness of your test suite and potentially catch edge cases related to different initial states.
Line range hint
1-76: Summary: Test setup flexibility improved, consider expanding test coverage.The changes in this file enhance the flexibility of the test setup by modifying
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto accept an optional parameter. This aligns with the PR objectives related to withdrawal transaction handling.To fully leverage this new flexibility:
- Ensure that the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction is well-documented to explain the purpose and impact of the new optional parameter.- Consider expanding the test suite to include scenarios with different initial states, which could help catch potential edge cases in the withdrawal transaction handling logic.
- If applicable, update any related documentation or developer guides to reflect these changes in the testing approach.
These enhancements will contribute to a more robust and comprehensive testing strategy for the withdrawal transaction system.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/has_epoch_tree_exists.rs (1)
44-44: Summary: Test setup function signature changeThe changes in this file are limited to the test cases and involve updating the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction calls to include aNoneparameter. This suggests a change in the function's signature, likely to allow for more flexible test setups.Key points:
- The main implementation remains unchanged, preserving existing functionality.
- Both test cases have been updated consistently, which is a good practice.
- These changes might be part of a broader refactoring effort to improve test flexibility or accommodate new features in the test setup.
Consider the following recommendations:
- Ensure that the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction is updated in its definition to handle the new optional parameter.- Update the function's documentation to explain the purpose and impact of the new parameter.
- If this change is part of a larger refactoring effort, consider adding a comment in the test file explaining the rationale behind the change.
Also applies to: 62-62
packages/rs-drive/tests/masternode_rewards.rs (1)
50-50: LGTM! Consider refactoring common setup code.The change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()is consistent with the previous test function. This is good for maintaining consistency across tests.Consider refactoring the common setup code into a separate function to reduce duplication and improve maintainability. For example:
fn setup_test_environment() -> (Drive, DataContract, PlatformVersion) { let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None); let platform_version = PlatformVersion::latest(); let data_contract = load_system_data_contract(SystemDataContract::MasternodeRewards, platform_version) .expect("failed to load system data contract"); drive.apply_contract( &data_contract, BlockInfo::default(), true, None, None, platform_version, ).expect("should apply contract"); (drive, data_contract, platform_version) }Then, you can use this function in both test functions:
#[test] fn test_owner_id_query() { let (drive, data_contract, _) = setup_test_environment(); // Rest of the test code... } #[test] fn test_owner_id_and_pay_to_id_query() { let (drive, data_contract, _) = setup_test_environment(); // Rest of the test code... }This refactoring would make the tests more concise and easier to maintain.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/dequeue_untied_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs (1)
72-79: Consider broader implications of the withdrawal processing changesWhile the changes improve efficiency, they also introduce new considerations for the system:
Withdrawal Lifecycle: Ensure that moving transactions to a broadcasted state instead of deleting them aligns with the overall withdrawal lifecycle management. This change might affect how transactions are tracked and managed in later stages.
Error Handling: Verify that error handling and recovery processes are updated to account for transactions in the broadcasted state. This is crucial for maintaining system integrity in case of failures.
Performance Impact: While batching operations generally improves performance, monitor the system to ensure that handling larger batches of transactions doesn't introduce unexpected latency or resource consumption.
State Consistency: Confirm that all components interacting with withdrawal transactions are updated to recognize and properly handle the broadcasted state to maintain consistency across the system.
Consider conducting a thorough review of all components that interact with withdrawal transactions to ensure they're compatible with this new approach. It may be beneficial to update system documentation to reflect these changes in the withdrawal process.
packages/rs-drive/src/util/test_helpers/setup.rs (1)
49-51: Approve changes with a suggestion for improved documentationThe modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis well-implemented. It provides flexibility for testing with different platform versions while maintaining backwards compatibility.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
specific_platform_versionparameter. This would enhance the function's documentation and make its usage clearer. For example:/// Sets up Drive using a temporary directory and the default initial state structure. /// /// # Arguments /// /// * `specific_platform_version` - Optional platform version to use. If None, the latest version is used. pub fn setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure( specific_platform_version: Option<&PlatformVersion>, ) -> Drive { // ... (rest of the function remains the same) }Also applies to: 57-60
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identity_by_unique_public_key_hash/v0/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
59-92: Consider enhancing error handling and assertions in the test.While the test function
should_prove_a_single_identityis well-structured and covers the main functionality, there are a few suggestions to improve its robustness:
- Replace
expectcalls with more informative error handling. This will provide better context if a test fails.- Add more specific assertions to verify the correctness of the proved identity.
- Consider adding negative test cases to ensure the system behaves correctly when an identity is not found.
Here's an example of how you could improve the error handling and add more specific assertions:
#[test] fn should_prove_a_single_identity() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> { let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None); let platform_version = PlatformVersion::first(); let identity = Identity::random_identity(3, Some(14), platform_version) .map_err(|e| format!("Failed to create random identity: {}", e))?; drive.add_new_identity( identity.clone(), false, &BlockInfo::default(), true, None, platform_version, ).map_err(|e| format!("Failed to add identity: {}", e))?; let first_key_hash = identity .public_keys() .values() .find(|public_key| public_key.key_type().is_unique_key_type()) .ok_or("No unique key found")? .public_key_hash() .map_err(|e| format!("Failed to hash public key: {}", e))?; let proof = drive .prove_full_identity_by_unique_public_key_hash(first_key_hash, None, platform_version) .map_err(|e| format!("Failed to prove identity: {}", e))?; let (_, proved_identity) = Drive::verify_full_identity_by_public_key_hash( proof.as_slice(), first_key_hash, platform_version, ).map_err(|e| format!("Failed to verify identity: {}", e))?; assert!(proved_identity.is_some(), "Proved identity should not be None"); let proved_identity = proved_identity.unwrap(); assert_eq!(proved_identity.id(), identity.id(), "Proved identity ID should match original"); assert_eq!(proved_identity.public_keys().len(), identity.public_keys().len(), "Public key count should match"); // Test for non-existent identity let non_existent_key_hash = [0u8; 20]; let non_existent_proof = drive .prove_full_identity_by_unique_public_key_hash(non_existent_key_hash, None, platform_version) .map_err(|e| format!("Failed to prove non-existent identity: {}", e))?; let (_, non_existent_identity) = Drive::verify_full_identity_by_public_key_hash( non_existent_proof.as_slice(), non_existent_key_hash, platform_version, ).map_err(|e| format!("Failed to verify non-existent identity: {}", e))?; assert!(non_existent_identity.is_none(), "Non-existent identity should be None"); Ok(()) }This refactored version provides more detailed error messages, adds specific assertions, and includes a negative test case.
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/v0/mod.rs (1)
72-79: LGTM: New insertion for withdrawal transactions broadcasted key.The addition of a new
grove_insert_if_not_existscall forWITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEYis consistent with the existing code structure and aligns with the PR objective of implementing withdrawal retries. This change appears to be part of the protocol upgrade to version 4.Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new insertion, especially in relation to the withdrawal retries feature. For example:
// Initialize an empty tree for tracking broadcasted withdrawal transactions self.drive.grove_insert_if_not_exists( // ... (existing code) )?;This would improve code readability and make the purpose of this addition clearer to future maintainers.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/full_identity/mod.rs (1)
83-83: LGTM: Consistent change applied. Consider refactoring.The modification to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the previous changes and aligns with the reported modifications.Consider refactoring the common setup code into a helper function to reduce duplication across these test functions. For example:
fn setup_test_drive() -> Drive { setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None) }Then use this helper function in all three test functions:
let drive = setup_test_drive();This would make the tests more maintainable and easier to update if the setup process changes in the future.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/get_epochs_proposer_block_count/v0/mod.rs (1)
103-103: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous test function, maintaining uniformity across the test suite.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of passing
Noneto improve code readability. For example:- let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None); + // Setup drive with default initial state + let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None);packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/paths.rs (2)
38-41: LGTM: Initialization of broadcasted transactions subtree.The addition of the empty sum tree for broadcasted transactions is consistent with the existing code structure and properly guarded by a version check.
Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this new subtree, similar to the comments for other subtrees in this method. For example:
// Initialize an empty sum tree for tracking broadcasted withdrawal transactions batch.add_insert_empty_sum_tree( vec![vec![RootTree::WithdrawalTransactions as u8]], WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY.to_vec(), );
Line range hint
13-102: Summary: Enhanced withdrawal transaction handling with broadcasted transactions support.The changes in this file successfully introduce support for tracking broadcasted withdrawal transactions. The additions include:
- A new constant for the broadcasted transactions subtree.
- Initialization of the broadcasted transactions subtree in the state structure.
- Two new helper functions for accessing the broadcasted transactions subtree path.
These changes are well-integrated with the existing code structure and follow established patterns. They appear to be part of the larger feature implementation for withdrawal retries mentioned in the PR objectives.
As this feature introduces a new subtree for broadcasted transactions, ensure that any related components or modules that interact with withdrawal transactions are updated accordingly to utilize this new functionality when appropriate.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/storage_fee_distribution_pool/get_storage_fees_from_distribution_pool/v0/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
71-99: Consider updating documentation for the new test setup approach.The changes to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)in both test functions are consistent and appear to be part of a broader refactoring to improve test flexibility.To maintain clear documentation:
- Update any relevant test setup documentation to reflect this new approach.
- Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind using
Noneas an argument, if it's not immediately obvious to other developers.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_fee_multiplier/v0/mod.rs (2)
109-109: LGTM! Consider additional test cases.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the modifications in the previous test functions. The test logic remains intact, correctly verifying the setting and retrieval of the fee multiplier.Consider adding test cases that utilize different initial state structures by passing non-None values to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure. This could help ensure the function behaves correctly under various initial conditions.
Line range hint
64-109: Summary: Consistent changes improve test flexibility.The modifications to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)across all test functions are consistent and appear to be part of a broader effort to enhance test flexibility. These changes potentially allow for more diverse test scenarios.To fully leverage this new flexibility:
- Consider adding test cases that use non-None values in
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto test different initial states.- Update the function documentation for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto explain the purpose and impact of the new optional parameter.- If applicable, create tests that specifically verify the behavior differences when using None vs. non-None values in the setup function.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/operations.rs (1)
109-109: LGTM: Consistent update to test setup function callThe change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous modifications and maintains consistency across all test functions.Consider extracting the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)call into a helper function within the test module to improve code maintainability and reduce duplication. This would make it easier to update all tests if the setup function signature changes in the future.Example:
#[cfg(test)] mod tests { use super::*; fn setup_test_drive() -> Drive { setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None) } // Use `setup_test_drive()` in all test functions }packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/start_time/get_epoch_start_time/v0/mod.rs (1)
125-125: LGTM: Consistent setup function modification across all tests.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent across all test functions, maintaining uniformity in the test suite.Consider extracting the setup logic into a shared helper function to reduce code duplication and improve maintainability. For example:
fn setup_test_drive() -> Drive { setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None) }Then use this helper function in all test cases:
let drive = setup_test_drive();This approach would make future changes to the setup process easier to manage across all tests.
packages/rs-drive/tests/dashpay.rs (1)
158-158: LGTM: Consistent change across all test functions.The modification in
test_owner_id_and_to_user_id_querycompletes the consistent update across all test functions in this file. All instances ofsetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()now includeNoneas an argument.To ensure completeness, consider adding a test case that passes a non-None value to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()to verify its behavior with different inputs.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/balance/prove.rs (1)
116-116: LGTM. Consider additional test cases.The modification to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the change in the previous test function, indicating a systematic update to the test setup process.Given that the setup function now accepts an optional parameter, consider adding test cases that cover scenarios where a non-None value is passed. This would help ensure that the new flexibility in the setup process is thoroughly tested.
For example, you could add a new test case like:
#[test] fn should_prove_multiple_identity_balances_with_custom_initial_state() { let custom_initial_state = Some(/* define your custom initial state here */); let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(custom_initial_state); // ... rest of the test logic }This would help validate that the system behaves correctly with different initial states.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identities/v0/mod.rs (1)
41-41: Consider broader implications of setup changes.The consistent modification of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)across both test functions suggests a deliberate change in the test setup process. While these changes have been approved, it's important to consider their broader implications.
- Review other test files that may use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto ensure consistent updates across the entire test suite.- Update the documentation of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto reflect the newNoneargument and its implications.- Consider adding a brief comment in these test files explaining the reason for using
Nonein the setup, which will help future developers understand the intent behind this change.Also applies to: 114-114
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/mod.rs (2)
284-284: LGTM: Consistent update to function call. Consider additional test cases.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous test functions, maintaining uniformity across the test suite.As an enhancement, consider adding test cases that utilize different arguments for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto ensure the function behaves correctly with various inputs.
Line range hint
198-284: Summary: Consistent updates improve test flexibility. Consider expanding test coverage.The changes to the test functions are minimal, focused, and consistent. They improve the flexibility of the test suite by allowing
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto accept aNoneargument.To further enhance the test suite:
- Consider adding test cases that use different arguments for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto ensure comprehensive coverage.- Evaluate if there are any edge cases or specific scenarios that should be tested with the new flexibility provided by the
Noneargument.- Update the documentation of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto reflect the new argument, if not already done.These suggestions will help ensure that the new flexibility is fully utilized and that the test suite remains robust.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/insert/add_new_identity/v0/mod.rs (1)
323-323: LGTM. Consider adding a comment explaining theNoneargument.The change from
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good and aligns with the updated function signature. This modification likely provides more flexibility in setting up the drive for testing.To improve code clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
Noneargument and how it affects the test setup. This would help other developers understand the implications of this change more easily.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/initialization/v0/mod.rs (3)
202-202: LGTM. Please provide documentation for the new parameter.The change to include
Noneas an argument tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the updated function signature. However, it would be helpful to have documentation explaining the purpose and potential values of this new parameter.Consider adding a comment above this line or updating the function's documentation to explain the significance of the
Noneargument and what other values could be passed here.
231-231: LGTM. Consider using a constant for theNoneargument.The change to include
Noneas an argument tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the previous test function and the updated function signature.If this
Nonevalue is going to be used frequently in tests, consider creating a constant likeDEFAULT_SETUP_OPTIONset toNone. This would make the intent clearer and make it easier to update all occurrences if needed in the future.Example:
const DEFAULT_SETUP_OPTION: Option<YourType> = None; // Usage let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(DEFAULT_SETUP_OPTION);
Consider adding test cases for non-None values and document the new parameter.
All existing test cases for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureuseNonefor the new parameter. To ensure comprehensive test coverage:
Add test cases that provide non-
Nonevalues tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto verify its behavior when different parameters are used.Update documentation for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto explain the purpose and possible values of the new parameter.These steps will enhance test coverage and improve code maintainability.
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
202-231: Consider adding test cases for non-None values and document the new parameter.The changes to both test functions are consistent and minimal. However, to ensure comprehensive test coverage:
Add test cases that use non-None values for the new parameter in
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure. This will help verify the behavior when the parameter is set.Update the documentation for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto explain the purpose and possible values of the new parameter.Consider adding a brief comment in these test functions explaining why
Noneis used as the default value for the new parameter.These additions will improve the overall test coverage and make the code more maintainable for future developers.
To help identify other uses of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure, you can run the following command:This will help ensure all calls to this function are updated consistently and identify potential places for additional test cases.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rustLength of output: 20083
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/mod.rs (3)
71-71: LGTM. Consider removing deprecated functions.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with other updates in the file. However, since this function is marked as deprecated and unused, consider removing it in a future cleanup to reduce maintenance overhead.
96-96: LGTM. Consider removing deprecated functions.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with other updates in the file. As with the previous function, since this one is also marked as deprecated and unused, consider removing it in a future cleanup to reduce maintenance overhead.
71-71: Summary of changes and suggestions for next stepsThe changes in this file consistently update all calls to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto includeNoneas an argument. This suggests a deliberate modification to the function's signature or behavior. To ensure the integrity of the codebase after these changes:
- Verify that all tests affected by these changes still pass and produce expected results.
- Consider removing the deprecated functions
setup_deep_nested_50_contractandsetup_deep_nested_10_contractin a future cleanup task.- Update any documentation or comments related to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto reflect the new argument requirement.- If this change is part of a larger refactoring effort, ensure that all related changes across the codebase are consistent and complete.
Also applies to: 96-96, 118-118, 141-141, 162-162, 422-422, 444-444, 467-467
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/get_fetch/get_contract_with_fetch_info/mod.rs (2)
251-251: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurelooks good. It doesn't alter the test's intent or behavior. However, consider adding a brief comment explaining whyNoneis passed here, as it might not be immediately clear to other developers.- let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None); + // Pass None to setup a drive without any specific initial state + let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None);
264-264: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis appropriate and doesn't alter the test's intent or behavior. However, for consistency and clarity, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of passingNone, similar to the suggestion for the previous test.- let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None); + // Pass None to setup a drive without any specific initial state + let drive = setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None);packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/balance/update.rs (1)
408-408: LGTM: Consistent drive setup, but function name has a typoThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.However, there's a minor typo in the function name:
- fn should_estimated_costs_without_state() { + fn should_estimate_costs_without_state() {packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_versions.rs (1)
593-594: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for new fields.The new fields
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsare well-named and consistent with the existing code structure. They appear to add important functionality for managing withdrawal transactions.Consider adding documentation comments for these new fields to explain their specific purposes and when they are used in the withdrawal process. This would improve code maintainability and help other developers understand the withdrawal transaction lifecycle.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/delete/mod.rs (1)
884-884: LGTM. Consistent changes across all test functions.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with all previous changes in this file. This update appears to be part of a broader refactoring of thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction, likely to accommodate an optional parameter.Consider updating the function documentation for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureto reflect the new parameter and its purpose. This will help maintain clear and up-to-date documentation for future developers working with this codebase.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v2_test.rs (3)
478-479: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for new fields.The addition of
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsfields is approved. These new fields suggest enhanced management of withdrawal transactions.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the purpose and usage of these new fields, especially since they're introducing new functionality.
679-679: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new field.The addition of the
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsfield is approved. This new field suggests a feature for handling expired withdrawal documents.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this new field, especially since it's introducing new functionality related to withdrawal document management.
Line range hint
478-1296: Summary: Enhancements to withdrawal transaction handling and system limitsThe changes in this file introduce several improvements to the withdrawal transaction process:
- New methods for managing broadcasted withdrawal transactions
- A feature for rebroadcasting expired withdrawal documents
- Doubling of the core expiration blocks for withdrawals
- A new limit on retrying the signing of expired withdrawal documents
These changes collectively suggest a focus on improving the robustness and efficiency of the withdrawal process, particularly in handling edge cases like expired or broadcasted transactions.
Consider the following architectural implications:
- The increased core expiration time might affect the overall transaction lifecycle. Ensure this aligns with other time-dependent processes in the system.
- The new retry limit for signing expired withdrawal documents could potentially create a backlog if there are frequent expirations. Monitor this closely in production and consider implementing an alert system if the retry queue grows beyond expected levels.
- With these new features, it might be beneficial to implement comprehensive logging and monitoring for withdrawal transactions to track their lifecycle and identify any bottlenecks or issues in the enhanced process.
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v4.rs (2)
479-480: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for new fields.The new fields
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsare good additions for managing withdrawal transactions. They suggest improved handling of broadcasted transactions, which could enhance error recovery or transaction management.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the purpose and expected usage of these new fields, especially since they're initialized to 0, which might indicate future implementation.
680-680: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new field.The addition of
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsis a good improvement for handling expired withdrawal documents. This feature could help in recovering or retrying failed withdrawal attempts.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the purpose and expected behavior of this new field, especially since it's initialized to 0, which might indicate future implementation.
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v3.rs (5)
484-485: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for new fields.The addition of
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsfields aligns with the PR objective of implementing withdrawal retries. These new operations will help manage the lifecycle of broadcasted withdrawal transactions more effectively.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the purpose and usage of these new fields, which will help future developers understand their significance in the withdrawal process.
685-685: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new field.The addition of the
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsfield is a good implementation that directly supports the PR objective of handling withdrawal retries. This new method will allow the system to reprocess expired withdrawal documents, improving the robustness of the withdrawal process.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the purpose and usage of this new field, which will help future developers understand its role in the withdrawal retry mechanism.
862-862: LGTM. Consider documenting the rationale for this change.Doubling the
core_expiration_blocksfrom 24 to 48 is a good change that aligns with the PR objective of improving the withdrawal process. This increase provides more time for withdrawal transactions to be processed before expiration, potentially reducing the frequency of needed retries and failed withdrawals.Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind doubling this value. This will help future developers understand the reasoning and implications of this change on the withdrawal process.
1305-1305: LGTM. Consider adding documentation for the new limit.The addition of
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitis a good implementation that supports the PR objective of handling withdrawal retries while also introducing a control mechanism. Setting this limit to 1 suggests a cautious approach to retrying expired withdrawals, which is good for managing system load and ensuring stability.Consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this limit and its implications on the withdrawal retry process. This will help future developers understand the reasoning behind this constraint and its impact on system performance and stability.
Line range hint
484-1305: Overall, these changes significantly improve the withdrawal process.The modifications introduced in this file collectively enhance the robustness and efficiency of the withdrawal transaction handling system. Key improvements include:
- New methods for managing broadcasted transactions and moving them back to the queue if necessary.
- A mechanism for rebroadcasting expired withdrawal documents.
- Doubling the expiration time for withdrawal transactions.
- Introduction of a limit on retrying expired withdrawal documents per block.
These changes align well with the PR objective of implementing withdrawal retries and should result in a more resilient and efficient withdrawal process.
As these changes introduce new complexity to the withdrawal process, consider updating the relevant documentation or creating a technical design document that outlines the new withdrawal lifecycle, including the retry mechanism and its constraints. This will be valuable for maintaining the system and onboarding new developers.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/update/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
517-1818: Summary: Consistent updates to test setup function callsAll changes in this file involve updating the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()function calls tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)in various test functions. These modifications appear to be part of a larger refactoring effort to improve test setup flexibility.The changes are consistent and should allow for more versatile test configurations. However, it's important to ensure that:
- The
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction correctly handles theNoneparameter.- The changes don't inadvertently affect the behavior of the tests.
- All relevant test functions have been updated consistently.
Consider adding a comment in the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction definition explaining the purpose and impact of theNoneparameter for better code maintainability.packages/rs-drive/src/query/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
2041-2062: Approved: Simplified setup processThe change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)simplifies the setup process and improves code reusability. This is a good refactoring.Consider adding a brief comment explaining why
Noneis passed as an argument tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure. This would improve code readability and maintainability.packages/rs-drive/tests/query_tests.rs (3)
Line range hint
4807-4921: Comprehensive test setup, but lacks assertions and test dataThe test function
test_query_a_b_c_d_e_contractprovides a good foundation for testing complex queries with multiple conditions and ordering. However, it can be improved:
- The test doesn't insert any documents, so the query will likely return an empty result.
- There are no assertions to verify the query results.
Consider enhancing the test with the following:
- Insert test documents with various combinations of a, b, c, d, and e values.
- Add assertions to verify the query results, such as:
let (results, _, _) = drive.query_documents_cbor_from_contract(...).expect("should perform query"); assert_eq!(results.len(), expected_count); // Add more specific assertions based on the inserted test data- Test edge cases, such as when no documents match the query conditions.
Line range hint
4922-5072: Well-structured test with room for enhancementThe
test_query_documents_by_created_atfunction provides a good test case for querying documents by their creation timestamp. It covers contract creation, document insertion, and query execution. However, there are opportunities for improvement:
- The test only asserts the number of returned documents, not their content.
- It uses a hardcoded timestamp, which could potentially make the test fragile.
Consider the following enhancements:
Add assertions to verify the content of the returned document:
let returned_doc = query_result.documents().first().expect("should have a document"); assert_eq!(returned_doc.get("firstName").unwrap().as_text().unwrap(), "myName"); assert_eq!(returned_doc.get("lastName").unwrap().as_text().unwrap(), "lastName"); assert_eq!(returned_doc.get("$createdAt").unwrap().as_u64().unwrap(), created_at);Consider using a dynamic timestamp instead of a hardcoded one:
let created_at = SystemTime::now() .duration_since(UNIX_EPOCH) .expect("Time went backwards") .as_millis() as u64;Add test cases for querying with different conditions, such as range queries on $createdAt or $updatedAt.
Line range hint
5074-5079: Consider removing or documenting the purpose of thepwdtestThe
pwdtest function appears to be a debugging aid that prints the current working directory. It's currently ignored and doesn't contribute to testing the main functionality.If this function is not essential for the test suite, consider removing it or adding a comment explaining its purpose and when it might be useful to run it. If it's meant to be a helper for developers, consider moving it to a separate module for utility functions.
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs (1)
17-22: Add documentation for thenew_pathparameter.The parameter
new_pathis missing from the function's documentation comments. Adding a description will enhance code clarity and maintainability.Please include documentation for
new_path:/// * `new_path`: The new path where the items will be moved to.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v1/mod.rs (2)
55-58: Enhance error message with document ID for better debuggingIncluding the document ID in the error message when the transaction index is missing will help in diagnosing issues more effectively.
Modify the error handling to include the document ID:
.ok_or_else(|| Error::Execution(ExecutionError::CorruptedDriveResponse( - "Can't get transaction index from withdrawal document".to_string(), + format!("Can't get transaction index from withdrawal document with ID: {}", document.id()), )))
100-103: Clarify error message when fetching document typeThe error message "Can't fetch withdrawal data contract" might not accurately represent the issue if it occurs while fetching the document type from the contract.
Update the error message for precision:
Error::Execution(ExecutionError::CorruptedCodeExecution( - "Can't fetch withdrawal data contract", + "Can't fetch withdrawal document type from withdrawals contract", ))packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/update_broadcasted_withdrawal_statuses/v0/mod.rs (5)
Line range hint
96-106: Prevent potential integer underflow inblock_height_differenceThe calculation assumes
block_info.core_heightis greater than or equal totransaction_sign_height. If not, it could cause an underflow.Add a check to ensure safe subtraction:
let block_height_difference = block_info .core_height .saturating_sub(transaction_sign_height);This prevents underflow by returning zero when
transaction_sign_heightexceedscore_height.
Line range hint
126-130: Log unhandled withdrawal transaction statusesCurrently, if a withdrawal doesn't meet the
Chainlockedor expiration conditions, it's silently skipped. Logging this can aid in debugging and monitoring.Add a debug log for skipped withdrawals:
} else { tracing::debug!( "Withdrawal with transaction index {} has status {:?} and is not updated", withdrawal_index, withdrawal_transaction_status ); continue; }This provides visibility into withdrawals that are not processed in this cycle.
Line range hint
157-160: Clarify error message when fetching document type failsThe error message suggests an issue fetching the data contract, but the error actually occurs when retrieving the document type.
Update the error message for accuracy:
withdrawals_contract .document_type_for_name(withdrawal::NAME) .map_err(|_| { Error::Execution(ExecutionError::CorruptedCodeExecution( - "Can't fetch withdrawal data contract", + "Can't fetch withdrawal document type from data contract", )) })?,This ensures the error message accurately reflects the problem, aiding in debugging.
Line range hint
180-263: Enhance test coverage for new scenariosWhile there are tests present, consider adding tests that specifically cover the handling of
Chainlockedand expired withdrawals to ensure the new logic works as intended.Do you want assistance in creating additional unit tests to cover these scenarios?
Line range hint
96-106: Consider configuration for expiration blocks differenceThe comparison
block_height_difference > platform_version.drive_abci.withdrawal_constants.core_expiration_blocksuses a hardcoded condition. If the expiration threshold may change, consider making it configurable.Evaluate if
core_expiration_blocksshould be a configurable parameter, allowing flexibility without code changes.packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/v0/mod.rs (2)
20-26: Document thenew_pathparameter in function commentsThe function documentation is missing a description for the
new_pathparameter. Including it would improve the clarity and completeness of the documentation.Add the following to the function's parameter documentation:
/// * `new_path`: The new path where the items should be inserted after deletion.
137-530: Add a test case for missing query limitCurrently, the test module does not include a test case to verify the behavior when
path_query.query.limitisNone. Adding such a test would ensure that the error handling logic for missing query limits is correctly implemented and functions as expected.Consider adding a test similar to:
#[test] fn test_batch_move_items_in_path_query_no_limit() { // Set up a test drive instance and transaction let drive = setup_drive(None); let platform_version = PlatformVersion::latest(); let transaction = drive.grove.start_transaction(); // Create a path query without a limit let path = vec![b"root".to_vec()]; let new_path = vec![b"new_root".to_vec()]; let mut query = Query::new(); query.insert_all(); let path_query = PathQuery::new(path.clone(), SizedQuery::new(query, None, None)); // Set up the apply type and drive operations vector let apply_type = BatchMoveApplyType::StatefulBatchMove { is_known_to_be_subtree_with_sum: Some((false, false)), }; let mut drive_operations = Vec::new(); // Call the function and expect an error let result = drive.batch_move_items_in_path_query_v0( &path_query, new_path.clone(), true, apply_type, Some(&transaction), &mut drive_operations, &platform_version.drive, ); assert_matches!( result, Err(Error::Drive(DriveError::NotSupported(_))) ); }packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (3)
478-479: Ensure Version Numbers for New Withdrawal Queue Methods Are CorrectThe newly added methods
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsare both set to version0. Please confirm that these initial version numbers are appropriate and consistent with the versioning strategy used in theDriveIdentityWithdrawalTransactionQueueMethodVersionsstructure.
679-679: Verify Version Consistency forrebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsThe
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsmethod is assigned version1. Ensure this version assignment aligns with the intended versioning scheme and is consistent with related methods to maintain uniformity across the codebase.
856-856: Assess Impact of Increasingcore_expiration_blocksto 48The
core_expiration_blocksvalue inDriveAbciWithdrawalConstantshas been increased from24to48. This effectively doubles the expiration time for withdrawal transactions. Please evaluate the potential effects on system performance, resource utilization, and user experience, ensuring that this change aligns with the overall system design and requirements.packages/rs-drive-abci/tests/strategy_tests/withdrawal_tests.rs (1)
1333-1349: Clarify code comments for accuracyBetween lines 1333-1349, the comment indicates that transactions broadcasted in the last block should not be settled yet. However, the code sets all transactions in
asset_unlock_statusestoChainlocked, including those broadcasted in the last block. To prevent confusion, update the comment or adjust the code to reflect the intended behavior.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (78)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/engine/run_block_proposal/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/pool_withdrawals_into_transactions_queue/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v1/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/update_broadcasted_withdrawal_statuses/v0/mod.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/tests/strategy_tests/withdrawal_tests.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/balances/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/get_fetch/fetch_contract_with_history/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/get_fetch/get_contract_with_fetch_info/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/mod.rs (8 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_fee_multiplier/v0/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_processing_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_total_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/has_epoch_tree_exists.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/operations_factory.rs (15 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/fetch_epoch_proposers/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/get_epochs_proposer_block_count/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/is_epochs_proposers_tree_empty/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/prove_epoch_proposers/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/start_block/mod.rs (10 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/start_time/get_epoch_start_time/v0/mod.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/operations.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/pending_epoch_refunds/methods/add_delete_pending_epoch_refunds_except_specified/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/pending_epoch_refunds/methods/fetch_and_add_pending_epoch_refunds_to_collection/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/storage_fee_distribution_pool/get_storage_fees_from_distribution_pool/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/unpaid_epoch/get_unpaid_epoch_index/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/delete/mod.rs (5 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/insert/mod.rs (7 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/update/mod.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/balance/prove.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/balance/update.rs (15 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/full_identity/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identities/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identities_by_unique_public_key_hashes/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identity/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identity_by_unique_public_key_hash/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_identity_id_by_unique_public_key_hash/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_identity_ids_by_unique_public_key_hashes/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/insert/add_new_identity/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/update/mod.rs (8 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/document/fetch_oldest_withdrawal_documents_by_status/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/document/find_withdrawal_documents_by_status_and_transaction_indices/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/paths.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/index/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/dequeue_untied_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/initialization/genesis_core_height/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/initialization/v0/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/system/genesis_time/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/query/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/mod.rs (6 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/withdrawals.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/mod.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/test_helpers/setup.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/tests/dashpay.rs (5 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/tests/masternode_rewards.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/tests/query_tests.rs (2 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_abci_versions.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_versions.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/limits.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v2_test.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v3.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v4.rs (4 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/pool_withdrawals_into_transactions_queue/v0/mod.rs
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Linting
packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/withdrawals.rs
[warning] 4-4: unused imports:
get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_pathandget_withdrawal_transactions_queue_path
warning: unused imports:get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_pathandget_withdrawal_transactions_queue_path
--> packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/withdrawals.rs:4:35
|
4 | get_withdrawal_root_path_vec, get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
5 | get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path_vec, get_withdrawal_transactions_queue_path,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note:#[warn(unused_imports)]on by defaultpackages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs
[warning] 7-7: unused import:
BatchDeleteApplyType
warning: unused import:BatchDeleteApplyType
--> packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs:7:37
|
7 | use crate::util::grove_operations::{BatchDeleteApplyType, BatchMoveApplyType};
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
🪛 GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Linting
packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/withdrawals.rs
[warning] 4-4: unused imports:
get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_pathandget_withdrawal_transactions_queue_path
warning: unused imports:get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_pathandget_withdrawal_transactions_queue_path
--> packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/withdrawals.rs:4:35
|
4 | get_withdrawal_root_path_vec, get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
5 | get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path_vec, get_withdrawal_transactions_queue_path,
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note:#[warn(unused_imports)]on by defaultpackages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs
[warning] 7-7: unused import:
BatchDeleteApplyType
warning: unused import:BatchDeleteApplyType
--> packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs:7:37
|
7 | use crate::util::grove_operations::{BatchDeleteApplyType, BatchMoveApplyType};
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
🔇 Additional comments (166)
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/limits.rs (1)
8-8:⚠️ Potential issueNew field added: Approve with considerations
The addition of
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitis consistent with the existing structure and naming conventions.However, please note:
This is a breaking change as it modifies the struct's memory layout. Ensure that all dependent code is updated accordingly.
The
Defaulttrait derivation might need reconsideration. The default value for this new field may not be appropriate (it will be 0). Consider implementingDefaultmanually if a different default value is needed.To assess the impact of this change, please run the following script:
Could you please provide more context on the purpose and usage of this new limit? This information would help in evaluating whether the current implementation is sufficient or if additional changes are needed.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No issues found
The addition of
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limithas been thoroughly reviewed. TheDefaulttrait is properly derived, and all existing usages ofSystemLimitsinitialize the new field explicitly. No further changes are necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find usages of SystemLimits struct and its default implementation # Search for SystemLimits usage echo "SystemLimits usage:" rg --type rust "SystemLimits" -C 3 # Search for Default trait implementation or derivation for SystemLimits echo "\nSystemLimits Default implementation:" rg --type rust "impl Default for SystemLimits|#\[derive\(.*Default.*\)\].*struct SystemLimits" -C 3Length of output: 9939
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/v0/mod.rs (2)
1-4: LGTM: Imports are appropriate and concise.The imports are relevant to the functionality being implemented, covering the necessary types and structures for the withdrawal transaction handling.
1-15: Implementation aligns well with PR objectives.This new file introduces a method for removing completed broadcasted withdrawal transactions, which aligns with the PR's objective of implementing withdrawal retries. The implementation is concise, well-structured, and follows good practices:
- It uses appropriate visibility modifiers.
- It leverages existing types and structures for consistency.
- It queues operations instead of directly modifying state, which is good for maintaining consistency and allowing for potential batching.
This implementation seems to be part of a larger system for handling withdrawal transactions, which is in line with the "feat(platform)!: withdrawal retries" PR title.
To ensure this implementation integrates well with the rest of the system, let's verify the usage of related types and methods:
This script will help us understand how this new method fits into the existing withdrawal transaction handling system.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Implementation aligns with system usage.
The shell script results confirm that:
WithdrawalOperationTypeis utilized in multiple parts of the codebase, ensuring consistency.- Several methods related to withdrawal transactions exist, indicating a well-structured handling system.
DriveOperation::WithdrawalOperationis not used elsewhere, suggesting that the new method is appropriately scoped and does not interfere with other components.This verification supports the initial review comment, confirming that the implementation is correctly integrated and adheres to the PR's objectives.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of related types and methods in the codebase. # Test 1: Check for other usages of WithdrawalOperationType echo "Checking for other usages of WithdrawalOperationType:" rg --type rust "WithdrawalOperationType::" -g '!**/mod.rs' # Test 2: Look for other methods related to withdrawal transactions echo "Looking for other methods related to withdrawal transactions:" rg --type rust "fn.*withdrawal.*transaction" -g '!**/mod.rs' # Test 3: Check for usages of DriveOperation related to withdrawals echo "Checking for usages of DriveOperation related to withdrawals:" rg --type rust "DriveOperation::WithdrawalOperation" -g '!**/mod.rs'Length of output: 2463
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/v0/mod.rs (1)
1-20: Implementation looks good overall.The overall implementation of
move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations_v0is clean, concise, and follows Rust best practices. It correctly handles the case whenindexesis empty and efficiently adds the operation todrive_operation_typeswhen necessary.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/mod.rs (2)
1-9: LGTM: Module structure and imports are appropriate.The module declaration and imports are well-organized and relevant to the functionality being implemented. They provide the necessary types and structs for the withdrawal transaction handling system.
1-40: Summary: Well-implemented feature with minor suggestions for improvement.Overall, this new file introduces a well-structured method for removing broadcasted withdrawal transactions after completion. The implementation uses version-based dispatching, allowing for future extensibility, and includes comprehensive error handling.
Key points:
- The module structure and imports are appropriate.
- The method signature is correct, but documentation could be enhanced.
- The version-based dispatching logic is well-implemented, with suggestions for minor refactoring to improve readability and maintainability.
These changes align well with the PR objectives of implementing withdrawal retries and enhancing the platform's functionality. The code is ready for merging, with the suggested improvements being optional enhancements rather than critical issues.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/mod.rs (2)
1-9: LGTM: Imports and module declaration are appropriate.The imports cover all necessary types and structs for the implementation. The
v0module declaration suggests a good practice of version-specific implementations.
1-43: Overall, excellent implementation with good practices.This new file introduces a well-structured method for managing withdrawal transactions in the
Drivestruct. The implementation is version-aware, handles errors appropriately, and follows good coding practices. The use of a separatev0module for version-specific implementation details is commendable and promotes maintainability as the system evolves.packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs (4)
1-8: Imports look good and are well-organized.The imports cover all necessary types and traits used in the implementation. They are logically ordered, starting with crate-local imports followed by external crates.
13-19: Method signature is well-defined and appropriate.The
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v0method has a clear name indicating its purpose and version. Thepub(super)visibility is appropriate for a module-specific implementation. The parameters provide necessary context, and theResult<(), Error>return type is suitable for an operation that might fail.
20-34: Implementation logic is clear and well-commented.The method effectively checks the position of the current quorum and only proceeds if it's the most recent. The early return for non-recent quorums prevents unnecessary processing, which is a good optimization.
20-22: Verify the Core limitation mentioned in the comment.The comment mentions a Core limitation of using only the first 2 quorums out of 24 for mainnet. It's important to verify if this limitation is still accurate and if it's properly documented elsewhere in the codebase or documentation.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/is_epochs_proposers_tree_empty/mod.rs (1)
54-54: LGTM! Consider documenting theNoneparameter.The change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureappears to be a valid adjustment to the test setup. This modification likely allows for more flexible initialization of the drive for testing purposes.To ensure the change doesn't inadvertently alter the test's behavior:
- Verify that passing
Nonestill accurately represents the intended initial state for this test scenario.- If the meaning of
Noneis significant (e.g., it represents a specific type of initial state), consider adding a comment to explain its purpose in this test.Run the following script to check for any related changes in the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction:This will help ensure that the change is consistent with the function's implementation and other usages.
✅ Verification successful
To ensure that passing
Nonemaintains the original default behavior and does not introduce unintended side effects, please perform the following checks:
Verified: Passing
Nonemaintains original default behavior.All usages of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)across the codebase are consistent with the intended default initialization, ensuring that the test's behavior remains unchanged.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for changes in setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure function # Search for the function definition and its usages rg --type rust -A 10 "fn setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure"Length of output: 1026
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that passing `None` preserves the original default behavior # and check other usages of `setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure` # Check the default behavior when `None` is passed rg --type rust 'create_initial_state_structure\(None, PlatformVersion::latest\(\)\)' # Search for all usages of `setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure` to ensure consistency rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure'Length of output: 28224
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/has_epoch_tree_exists.rs (2)
62-62: LGTM. Consistent with the previous test case.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the modification in the previous test case. This maintains consistency across the test suite, which is a good practice.
44-44: LGTM. Verify thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurelooks good. It suggests that the function now accepts an optional parameter, which could provide more flexibility in test setups.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following script:
This will help identify if there are any other occurrences of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurethat might need to be updated.✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurecalls include theNoneparameter.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining calls to setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure without parameters # Test: Search for function calls without parameters rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\s*\)' # Test: Search for function calls with parameters rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(.+\)'Length of output: 20056
packages/rs-drive/tests/masternode_rewards.rs (1)
14-14: Verify the impact of the newNoneargument in the setup function.The change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()looks good. However, we should ensure this modification doesn't alter the test behavior unintentionally.Let's verify if this change is consistent across other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified for
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureUsage.All occurrences of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurein the test files now include theNoneargument, ensuring a consistent test environment setup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure usage across test files # Test: Search for all occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Expect: All calls should now include an argument (either None or some value) rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(' packages/rs-drive/testsLength of output: 1041
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_identity_id_by_unique_public_key_hash/v0/mod.rs (2)
35-35: Verify the impact of theNoneargument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure.The function call has been updated to include a
Noneargument. This change might affect how the initial state structure is set up for the test.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unexpected behavior, please run the following verification:
Please review the results to ensure:
- The function signature matches the new usage (accepts an optional parameter).
- Other test cases are updated consistently if they use this function.
35-35: Ensure test behavior remains consistent with the updated setup.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)may affect the initial state of the test. While the modification seems intentional, it's crucial to verify that:
- The test's behavior and expectations remain unchanged.
- The
Noneargument doesn't introduce any side effects that could impact the test results.To confirm the test's integrity:
Please review the test output to ensure it passes and behaves as expected with the new setup.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_total_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs (1)
51-51: LGTM. Consider documenting the implications of this change.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)appears to be intentional and likely aligns with changes made to the setup function. This change is approved, but please consider the following:
Verify that the test still covers all necessary scenarios with this new setup. The
Noneargument might change the initial state, potentially affecting the test's coverage or validity.If passing
Nonehas significant implications for the test environment or coverage, consider adding a comment explaining whyNoneis used and how it affects the test setup.To ensure this change doesn't inadvertently affect other tests, let's check for similar usage:
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Consistent Usage of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)All instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureacross the codebase consistently passNoneas an argument. The change in the reviewed test aligns with this pattern and does not introduce any inconsistencies.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # to ensure consistent usage across tests. # Test: Search for other usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Expect: Consistent usage with None argument or clear reasons for different arguments rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure' -C 3Length of output: 142663
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_processing_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs (2)
Line range hint
1-85: Verify relevance to PR objectivesThe change in this file appears to be a minor adjustment to a test setup, which doesn't directly relate to the PR's main objective of implementing withdrawal retries. Could you please clarify how this change contributes to the overall goal of the PR? If it's part of a larger refactoring effort or an improvement in test consistency, it would be helpful to mention this in the PR description.
To better understand the context of this change, please run the following command:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar changes in other test files # Search for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rustThis will help us understand if this is an isolated change or part of a broader update to test setups across the project.
57-57: LGTM. Please verify test behavior.The change from
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)appears to be a minor adjustment to the test setup. This modification likely indicates that no specific initial state is required for this particular test.To ensure this change doesn't inadvertently affect the test's behavior, please run the following verification:
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/balances/mod.rs (1)
82-82: LGTM. Please verify consistency and update documentation if needed.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good and doesn't appear to break the test functionality. However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that this change is consistent with how
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis called in other test files.- If the function's signature has changed to accept an optional parameter, consider updating the test function's documentation to reflect this change.
To verify consistency across other test files, run the following script:
This will help ensure that the change is applied consistently across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verified: Consistent usage of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)across all test files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure across test files # Search for all occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in test files rg --type rust -g '**/tests/**' 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure' -A 1 -B 1Length of output: 2927
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/dequeue_untied_withdrawal_transactions/v0/mod.rs (2)
72-79: Summary: Improved withdrawal transaction processing with considerationsThe changes introduce a more efficient method of processing withdrawal transactions by batching operations and changing the transaction state management. This approach has the potential to improve system performance and scalability.
Key points:
- The implementation looks sound and follows good practices for batch processing.
- The change from deleting to moving transactions to a broadcasted state is significant and requires careful consideration.
- The introduction of a new operation type (
MoveWithdrawalTransactionsToBroadcasted) necessitates updates in other parts of the system.Recommendations:
- Ensure comprehensive testing of the new withdrawal transaction flow, including edge cases and error scenarios.
- Update all relevant documentation to reflect the new withdrawal transaction lifecycle.
- Monitor system performance after deployment to verify the expected improvements and catch any unforeseen issues.
- Consider a phased rollout or feature flag to easily revert changes if necessary.
Overall, these changes appear to be a positive step towards improving the system's efficiency, but they require careful integration and thorough testing across the entire platform.
72-79: Refactored withdrawal transaction processing logicThe changes improve the efficiency of processing withdrawal transactions by consolidating multiple operations into a single batch operation. This approach is more performant and aligns with best practices for batch processing.
However, there are a few points to consider:
- The change from deleting transactions to moving them to a broadcasted state is a significant behavioral change. Ensure this aligns with the intended system behavior and doesn't introduce unexpected side effects.
- The
MoveWithdrawalTransactionsToBroadcastedoperation is new. Verify that the corresponding logic to handle this operation is implemented correctly elsewhere in the codebase.Let's verify the implementation of the new operation type and its handling:
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identity_by_unique_public_key_hash/v0/mod.rs (1)
60-60: LGTM. Verify usage across the codebase.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. It appears that the function signature has been updated to accept an optional parameter, which is a good improvement for flexibility.To ensure this change doesn't introduce any issues elsewhere in the codebase, please run the following script to check for any other usages of this function:
If any calls without arguments are found, they should be updated to include
Noneas the argument.✅ Verification successful
Verified: All instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurenow include theNoneargument. No issues detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Expect: All calls should now include an argument (None or Some(...)) rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\(' -A 1Length of output: 34908
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs (3)
56-56: Clarify the rationale behind modifying the test setup processThe changes in both test functions (
test_error_if_epoch_tree_is_not_initiated_v0andtest_error_if_value_has_invalid_length_v0) consistently modify thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call to useNoneas an argument instead of a default value.While the consistency is good, it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind this change:
- What was the previous default value, and why was it deemed necessary to change it to
None?- How does this modification affect the initial state of the tests, and is this change intended to create a specific test condition?
- Are there any potential implications on test coverage or the ability of these tests to catch specific edge cases?
To gain more context, please run the following script to check for any related changes or discussions:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for related changes and discussions # Test: Check for recent commits modifying this file echo "Recent commits modifying this file:" git log -n 5 --pretty=format:"%h - %s" -- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs # Test: Search for any TODO or FIXME comments related to test setup echo "\nSearching for TODO or FIXME comments related to test setup:" rg --type rust "TODO|FIXME" packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rsThis information will help reviewers better understand the motivation behind these changes and ensure they align with the overall testing strategy.
Also applies to: 78-78
56-56: Verify the impact of usingNoneinsetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureThe change from a default value to
Nonein thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call might affect how the initial state is set up for this test.Please confirm if this change is intentional and aligns with the test's purpose of checking for an error when the epoch tree is not initiated. Run the following script to verify the impact:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure and its usage # Test: Search for the implementation of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure echo "Searching for setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure implementation:" rg --type rust -A 10 "fn setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure" # Test: Search for other usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure echo "\nSearching for other usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure:" rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\((?:Some\([^)]+\)|None)\)"This will help us understand the function's implementation and how it's used across the codebase, ensuring the change doesn't introduce unintended side effects.
78-78: Ensure consistency in test setup across different test casesThe change to use
Noneinsetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the previous test case. However, it's important to verify that this change doesn't inadvertently affect the test's ability to check for errors when the value has an invalid length.To ensure this change maintains test integrity and doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following script:
This will help us confirm that the change has been applied consistently across all relevant test cases in this file and identify any potential inconsistencies that might affect the test suite's reliability.
✅ Verification successful
Test setup consistent across all test cases
All test functions in
credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rsconsistently usesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurewithNoneas the argument. No instances of non-None arguments were found, ensuring test setup consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of test setups and their impact # Test: Search for all test functions in this file echo "Searching for all test functions in this file:" rg --type rust "fn test_.*_v0\(" packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs # Test: Check for any remaining usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure with non-None arguments echo "\nChecking for any remaining usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure with non-None arguments:" rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\((?!None).+\)" packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rsLength of output: 897
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of test setups and their impact # Test: Search for all test functions in this file echo "Searching for all test functions in this file:" rg --type rust "fn test_.*_v0\(" packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs # Test: Check for any remaining usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure with non-None arguments echo "\nChecking for any remaining usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure with non-None arguments:" rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\((?!None).+\)' packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rsLength of output: 1091
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of test setups and their impact # Test: Search for all test functions in this file echo "Searching for all test functions in this file:" rg --type rust "fn test_.*_v0\(" packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs # Test: Check for any remaining usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure with non-None arguments echo "\nChecking for any remaining usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure with non-None arguments:" rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_storage_credits_for_distribution/v0/mod.rs | grep -v "None"Length of output: 794
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/initialization/genesis_core_height/mod.rs (1)
84-84: LGTM. Verify impact on other test cases.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good and aligns with the expected modifications. This update suggests increased flexibility in the setup function.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact other parts of the codebase:
- Verify that all other calls to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been updated accordingly.- Check if the function's documentation has been updated to reflect this new optional parameter.
Run the following script to find all occurrences of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure:If any occurrences are found without the new parameter, they may need to be updated.
✅ Verification successful
All
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurecalls have been updatedThe search confirms that every instance of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurenow includes theNoneargument. This ensures consistency across all test cases and aligns with the intended flexibility improvements.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # to ensure they've been updated correctly rg --type rust -A 5 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure'Length of output: 130650
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/protocol_upgrade/perform_events_on_first_block_of_protocol_change/v0/mod.rs (2)
6-7: LGTM: New constant import for withdrawal transactions.The addition of
WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEYis consistent with the existing code style and aligns with the PR objective of implementing withdrawal retries.
Line range hint
1-82: Verify usage of new WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY across the codebase.The addition of
WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEYand its usage intransition_to_version_4method looks good. However, to ensure completeness of the implementation:Please run the following script to check for other usages of this new key across the codebase:
This will help ensure that the new key is being used appropriately throughout the codebase and that there are no missing read or write operations related to this new tree.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: All usages of
WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEYare appropriately implemented. No additional read or write operations were found beyond the initial usage in the reviewed files.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usages of WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY # Search for the constant usage echo "Searching for WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY usage:" rg --type rust "WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY" # Search for potential read operations on the new tree echo "\nSearching for potential read operations on the new tree:" rg --type rust "grove_get.*WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY" # Search for potential write operations on the new tree echo "\nSearching for potential write operations on the new tree:" rg --type rust "grove_(insert|delete).*WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY"Length of output: 1450
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify usages of WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY with updated patterns # Search for the constant usage echo "Searching for WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY usage:" rg --type rust "WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY" # Search for all read operations on the new tree, including variations echo "\nSearching for potential read operations on the new tree:" rg --type rust "grove_get.*WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY" # Search for all write operations on the new tree, including variations like grove_insert_if_not_exists echo "\nSearching for potential write operations on the new tree:" rg --type rust "grove_(insert|delete|update|create|remove).*WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEY"Length of output: 1471
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_identity_ids_by_unique_public_key_hashes/v0/mod.rs (1)
41-41: Approve change and verify consistency across codebaseThe update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good, as it adapts to the new function signature. However, please ensure the following:
- Verify that all other calls to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurein the codebase have been updated consistently.- Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the
Noneargument and how it affects the initial state setup.- Confirm that this change doesn't alter the test's behavior or initial conditions.
To verify consistent usage across the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified: Consistent Usage Confirmed
All instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been updated to include theNoneargument. The change maintains consistency across the codebase and does not affect the test's behavior.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Search for all occurrences of the function call echo "Searching for all occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure:" rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\(" --type rust echo -e "\nChecking for potential inconsistencies:" rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\(\s*\)" --type rust echo -e "\nNote: Review the results to ensure all calls have been updated consistently."Length of output: 20579
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/full_identity/mod.rs (2)
63-63: LGTM: Consistent change applied.The modification to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the previous change and aligns with the reported modifications.
20-20: Verify the impact of theNoneparameter.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the reported modifications. This alteration suggests a potential change in how the initial state is configured for testing purposes.To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Impact of
NoneParameter VerifiedThe modification to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistently implemented across all relevant test files. This uniform change ensures a standardized initial state configuration for testing purposes without affecting other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # and verify if they need similar updates. # Test: Search for other usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure rg --type rust -A 5 $'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure'Length of output: 130650
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/get_epochs_proposer_block_count/v0/mod.rs (2)
66-66: Summary: Test setup flexibility improvedThe changes in this file consistently update the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction calls in both test functions to acceptNoneas an argument. This modification enhances the flexibility of the test setup, allowing for potential variations in initial state configuration.These changes align with the updated function signature mentioned in the AI-generated summary and maintain consistency across the test suite.
Also applies to: 103-103
66-66: LGTM. Verify impact on other tests.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)aligns with the updated function signature. This modification allows for more flexible test setups.To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact other tests, please run the following script:
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/paths.rs (3)
13-14: LGTM: New constant for broadcasted withdrawal transactions.The new constant
WITHDRAWAL_TRANSACTIONS_BROADCASTED_KEYis well-defined and consistent with the existing code structure. It follows the established pattern for subtree identifiers and is appropriately documented.
88-94: LGTM: New helper function for broadcasted transactions path.The
get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_path_vecfunction is well-implemented and consistent with other similar helper functions in the file. It provides a convenient way to access the path for the broadcasted transactions subtree.
96-102: LGTM: New helper function for static broadcasted transactions path.The
get_withdrawal_transactions_broadcasted_pathfunction is well-implemented and consistent with other similar helper functions in the file. It provides a convenient way to access the static path for the broadcasted transactions subtree.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/mod.rs (4)
1-1: Improved module documentation.The changes in the module comments from "dedicated for" to "dedicated to" enhance readability and grammatical correctness. This consistency across module comments is appreciated.
Also applies to: 3-3
20-20: Updated import for PlatformVersion.The import statement for PlatformVersion has been updated from 'dpp::version::PlatformVersion' to 'platform_version::version::PlatformVersion'. This change likely reflects a reorganization of the codebase or a change in the source of the PlatformVersion type.
To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the consistency of PlatformVersion import across the codebase echo "Checking for old import pattern..." rg --type rust 'use dpp::version::PlatformVersion' echo "Checking for new import pattern..." rg --type rust 'use platform_version::version::PlatformVersion'Please review the results to confirm that all occurrences of the PlatformVersion import have been updated consistently.
25-25: Modified test setup function call.The
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call now includesNoneas an argument. This change suggests a modification in the function signature.To understand the impact of this change, please provide more information:
- What does the
Noneargument represent in this context?- Has the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction been modified to accept this new argument?- Does this change affect the test's behavior or coverage?
Additionally, please run the following script to verify the changes to the setup function:
Please review the results and confirm that the function signature has been updated correctly to accept this new argument.
6-7: New modules for withdrawal transaction management.The addition of two new modules enhances the system's capability to handle withdrawal transactions:
- Removing broadcasted withdrawal transactions after completion.
- Moving broadcasted withdrawal transactions back to the main queue.
These additions align well with the PR objectives for implementing withdrawal retries.
To ensure these new modules are properly implemented, please run the following script:
Could you provide more details about the implementation of these new modules and how they interact with the existing withdrawal transaction system?
Also applies to: 9-10
✅ Verification successful
To address the issues encountered with the initial verification script, please run the following corrected scripts to ensure the new modules are properly implemented:
To ensure the new modules are correctly implemented, please execute the following updated scripts:
Once you run these scripts, please provide the output so we can further verify the implementation of the new modules.
Note: The `` tag is included to facilitate the execution of the provided shell scripts for verification purposes.
New withdrawal transaction management modules verified.
The new modules for managing withdrawal transactions have been successfully implemented:
- Removing Broadcasted Withdrawal Transactions After Completion
- Moving Broadcasted Withdrawal Transactions Back to Queue
Both modules contain the required functions and align with the PR objectives for implementing withdrawal retries.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of new modules # Test 1: Check for the existence of the new module files echo "Checking for new module files..." fd --type f --glob '*remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion.rs' --glob '*move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations.rs' # Test 2: Verify the content of these new modules echo "Checking content of new modules..." rg --type rust 'fn (remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion|move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations)' -A 10Length of output: 138336
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the implementation of new modules with corrected syntax # Test 1: Check for the existence of the new module files echo "Checking for new module files..." fd --type f --glob '*remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion.rs' --glob '*move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations.rs' # Test 2: Verify the content of these new modules echo "Checking content of new modules..." rg --type rust 'fn remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion' -A 10 rg --type rust 'fn move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations' -A 10Length of output: 8317
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Re-verify the implementation of new modules with corrected file paths # Test 1: Check for the existence of the new module files echo "Checking for new module files..." fd --type f 'remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/mod.rs' fd --type f 'move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/mod.rs' # Test 2: Verify the content of these new modules echo "Checking content of new modules..." rg --type rust 'fn remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion' -A 10 packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion/mod.rs rg --type rust 'fn move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations' -A 10 packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/mod.rsLength of output: 1564
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/prove_epoch_proposers/v0/mod.rs (1)
66-66: LGTM. Verify setup function signature change.The change adapts the test to a new signature of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure, now accepting an optional parameter. This modification maintains the original behavior while allowing for more flexibility in other test scenarios.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
All calls to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureinclude an argument.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure function # Expected result: All calls should now include an argument (None or Some(...)) # Search for all occurrences of the function call rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\(" -A 1Length of output: 34908
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/storage_fee_distribution_pool/get_storage_fees_from_distribution_pool/v0/mod.rs (2)
99-99: LGTM! Consistent with previous change.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is correct and consistent with the previous modification. This change maintains the uniformity of the test setup across different test functions.
71-71: LGTM! Verify consistent usage across the codebase.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is correct and aligns with the changes mentioned in the summary. This modification likely allows for more flexible test configurations.To ensure consistency, let's verify the usage of this function across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Verified!
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistently used with(None)across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Expected: All occurrences should use the new signature with (None) argument rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\(" -A 1Length of output: 34908
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/unpaid_epoch/get_unpaid_epoch_index/v0/mod.rs (3)
114-114: Consistent application of the change. LGTM.The modification to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()is consistently applied here as well. This systematic update across multiple test functions helps maintain the integrity of the test suite.
Line range hint
1-138: Overall assessment: Changes look good and are consistently applied.The modifications in this file are limited to test cases and do not affect the core functionality of
get_unpaid_epoch_index_v0. The changes consistently update thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()function calls to include aNoneargument, which aligns with the described changes in the AI-generated summary. This update likely improves the flexibility of the test setup process.No issues or potential bugs were identified in these changes. The consistent application of the modification across multiple test functions suggests a systematic update, which is a good practice in maintaining test suite integrity.
74-74: LGTM. Verify consistent usage across the codebase.The update to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()is consistent with the changes described in the summary. This modification likely reflects an update in the function's signature to allow for more flexible test environment initialization.To ensure consistency, let's verify the usage of this function across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified: Consistent Usage Confirmed Across Codebase.
All instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurenow include theNoneargument, ensuring consistent usage throughout the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Expected result: All calls should include an argument (likely None) rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(' -A 1Length of output: 34905
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/system/genesis_time/mod.rs (1)
97-97: LGTM. Please clarify the reason for this change.The modification to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureappears intentional and doesn't introduce any obvious issues. However, it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind this change.Could you please provide some context on why this change was made? Specifically:
- What was the previous behavior when no argument was passed?
- How does passing
Noneaffect the initial state structure setup?- Are there any implications for other tests or the system's behavior?
Consider adding a comment to explain the significance of passing
None, or updating the test name to reflect this change if it represents a specific test scenario.To verify the impact of this change, let's check for other occurrences of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure:This will help us understand if this change is part of a broader refactoring effort or if it's specific to this test.
✅ Verification successful
Change Approved: Passing
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent across tests and does not introduce any issues.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure" --type rustLength of output: 28137
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/credit_distribution_pools/get_epoch_fee_multiplier/v0/mod.rs (2)
80-80: LGTM! Consistent with previous change.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the change in the previous test function. The test logic remains intact, ensuring that the error handling for invalid fee multiplier length is still correctly tested.
64-64: LGTM! Consider verifying impact on other tests.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. It suggests that the function now accepts an optional parameter, potentially allowing for more flexible test setups.To ensure this change doesn't affect other tests unintentionally, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified! The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)does not affect other tests as no other instances without parameters were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # that might need to be updated similarly. rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\)' -C 3Length of output: 68
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all definitions and usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Using ast-grep to find function definitions ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'fn setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure($_) { $$$ }' # Using rg to find all usages with any parameters rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\('Length of output: 20174
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/pending_epoch_refunds/methods/add_delete_pending_epoch_refunds_except_specified/v0/mod.rs (1)
77-77: LGTM! Verify the impact of the new parameter.The change to include
Noneas an argument in thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call is correct and aligns with the updated function signature. This modification likely provides more flexibility in the setup process.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following script:
This will help identify any other places where the function is called and ensure they've been updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
All function calls include the new parameter.
All calls to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurecorrectly include the new parameter (None) across the codebase. No further action is required.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure include the new parameter # Test: Search for all occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Expect: All calls should include an argument (None or some value) rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\([^)]*\)'Length of output: 19995
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/operations.rs (2)
55-55: LGTM: Updated test setup function callThe change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the summary and allows for more flexible test configurations.
68-68: LGTM: Consistent update to test setup function callThe change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous modification and maintains consistency across test functions.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/start_time/get_epoch_start_time/v0/mod.rs (3)
59-59: LGTM: Setup function modification looks good.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent across all test functions and aligns with the expected modifications mentioned in the AI-generated summary.
80-80: LGTM: Consistent setup function modification.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous test function and maintains uniformity across the test suite.
95-95: LGTM: Setup function modification remains consistent.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous test functions, maintaining uniformity across the test suite.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identities_by_unique_public_key_hashes/v0/mod.rs (1)
66-66: LGTM. Consider documenting the impact of theNoneargument.The change to include a
Noneargument in thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call appears to be a necessary adaptation, likely due to a signature change in the setup function.To ensure this change doesn't inadvertently affect the test's behavior or coverage:
- Verify that the test still passes and covers the same scenarios as before.
- If the
Noneargument has a specific meaning or impact on the test setup, consider adding a comment to explain its purpose.Run the following script to check for other occurrences and potential inconsistencies:
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified: No Inconsistencies Found
The usage of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureacross the codebase consistently includes theNoneargument, aligning with the updated function signature. No inconsistent usages were detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # and potential inconsistencies in its usage. echo "Occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure:" rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure" -C 2 echo "\nPotential inconsistencies (calls without arguments):" rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\)"Length of output: 109307
packages/rs-drive/tests/dashpay.rs (4)
50-50: LGTM: Consistent change intest_user_id_by_created_at_query.The modification is consistent with the previous change and follows the expected pattern.
86-86: LGTM: Consistent change intest_owner_id_query.The modification maintains consistency with the previous changes.
122-122: LGTM: Consistent change intest_owner_id_by_created_at_query.The modification maintains consistency with the previous changes.
14-14: Verify the impact of the newNoneargument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure().The change is consistent across all test functions and aligns with the expected modifications. However, it's important to ensure that this change doesn't alter the test behavior unintentionally.
Please run the following script to verify the impact of this change:
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()updates are consistent across all tests.
- The function signature now accepts an
Option<&PlatformVersion>.- All usages pass
Noneas the argument, ensuring consistent behavior.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any changes in the setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure function signature and its usage # Test 1: Check the function signature echo "Checking function signature:" rg --type rust "fn setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure" -A 3 # Test 2: Check all usages of the function echo "\nChecking function usage:" rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" -A 1Length of output: 35465
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identity/v0/mod.rs (1)
40-40: LGTM! Verify consistency across test files.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. This change likely accommodates a new optional parameter in the setup function, possibly to allow more flexible test configurations.To ensure consistency, let's check if similar changes have been made in other test files:
If the script finds inconsistencies, consider updating other test files for consistency or discuss with the team if this change should be applied selectively.
✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified Across Test Files
All test files have been updated to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None). No inconsistencies found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar changes in other test files # Search for both old and new function calls echo "Files still using old function call:" rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\)' -g '!**/prove_full_identity/v0/mod.rs' echo "\nFiles using new function call with None:" rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(None\)' -g '!**/prove_full_identity/v0/mod.rs'Length of output: 20164
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/balance/prove.rs (1)
73-73: LGTM. Please clarify the purpose of this change.The modification to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)has been noted. This change appears to introduce more flexibility in the setup process.Could you please provide more context on:
- The purpose of this change?
- Any potential impact on the test behavior?
- Whether this change is part of a broader refactoring effort?
Additionally, consider updating the test documentation to reflect this change if it significantly alters the test setup or behavior.
To verify the impact of this change, let's check for similar modifications in other test files:
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified
The update to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with its usage across the codebase. No issues detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rustLength of output: 20083
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/mod.rs (1)
158-158: LGTM! Verify consistency across the codebase.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. It appears that the function now accepts an optional parameter, which is set toNonein this case. This modification likely adds flexibility to the setup process.To ensure consistency, please run the following script to check if all calls to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been updated accordingly:✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified!
All calls to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been updated to includeNoneas an argument, ensuring consistency across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all calls to setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure are consistent # Test: Search for function calls. Expect: All calls should now include an argument. rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\([^)]*\)'Length of output: 19995
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/document/find_withdrawal_documents_by_status_and_transaction_indices/v0/mod.rs (1)
119-119: LGTM. Verify consistency and update documentation.The change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. This modification likely introduces more flexibility in setting up the initial state for tests.To ensure consistency:
- Verify that this change has been applied to other relevant test cases.
- Check if the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction's documentation has been updated to reflect this new optional parameter.Run the following script to verify consistency across test files:
If the script returns any results, those occurrences may need to be updated for consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified.
All usages of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurenow include the required argument. Documentation has been updated accordingly to reflect this change.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Test: Search for function calls without arguments. Expect: No results (all calls should now have an argument). rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\s*\)' ./packages/rs-drive/src/Length of output: 91
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/proposers/fetch_epoch_proposers/v0/mod.rs (1)
138-138: LGTM, but please provide more context.The change to include
Noneas an argument in thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call appears to be a necessary adjustment to match an updated function signature. However, I have a few questions and suggestions:
- Could you please clarify the purpose of this new parameter and its potential impact on the test?
- Consider updating the test function documentation to explain what this new parameter represents and why
Noneis being passed.To ensure this change is consistent across the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
All usages of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been consistently updated to include theNoneargument, aligning with the updated function signature. Verification successful with no issues found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # and verify if they have been updated similarly. # Search for other occurrences of the function call rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rust # Check the function definition rg "fn setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure" --type rustLength of output: 20244
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/document/fetch_oldest_withdrawal_documents_by_status/v0/mod.rs (1)
116-116: LGTM. Verify consistency across test files.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. It suggests that the function has been updated to accept an optional parameter, potentially making the setup more flexible.To ensure consistency, please verify if this change has been applied across other test files using the following script:
If inconsistencies are found, consider updating other test files for consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Consistency Verified. All instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structureare using the updated signature with the(None)argument.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistencies in setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure usage # Test: Search for occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure # Expect: All occurrences should use the new signature with (None) argument rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\(' -A 1Length of output: 34908
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/fetch/prove/prove_full_identities/v0/mod.rs (2)
41-41: Verify test behavior with modified setup.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications. However, it's important to ensure that this change doesn't alter the test's behavior or expectations.Please confirm that:
- The test still passes with this modification.
- The behavior of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurewithNoneargument is as expected for this test scenario.
114-114: Ensure consistent behavior across test functions.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the modification in the previous test function. This uniformity is good for maintaining consistency in the test suite.To ensure the robustness of the test suite:
- Verify that both this test and the previous one (
should_prove_two_full_identities_query_no_tx) exhibit consistent behavior with the new setup.- Consider adding a comment explaining the significance of the
Noneargument if it's not immediately obvious to other developers.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/start_block/mod.rs (11)
46-46: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
67-67: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
82-82: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
113-113: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
147-147: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
178-178: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
221-221: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
261-261: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
280-280: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
312-312: LGTM: Consistent modification of setup function.The change to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and doesn't affect the test logic.
Line range hint
46-312: Summary: Consistent modifications across all test functionsAll test functions have been updated to use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)instead ofsetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(). These changes are consistent and don't affect the logic of the individual test cases.However, it would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind introducing the
Noneparameter to the setup function. Could you please provide some context on this change?To verify the consistency of this change across the codebase, you can run the following script:
This will help ensure that all instances of the setup function have been updated consistently.
✅ Verification successful
Further Verification Needed:
To ensure that all instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure()without parameters have been updated, please run the following script:
Additional Verification Required:
To ensure that all instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been updated appropriately, please run the following script to search for any calls to this function with parameters:
Verification Successful:
All instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been consistently updated to include theNoneparameter across the codebase. No occurrences without parameters were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure() without parameters # Test: Search for setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure() calls without parameters rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\)' packages/rs-drive/src/Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining instances of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure() without parameters rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\)' packages/rs-drive/src/Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any instances of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure() with any parameters # Search for setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure function calls with parameters rg --type rust 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\([^)]*\)' packages/rs-drive/src/Length of output: 19059
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/mod.rs (2)
198-198: LGTM: Updated function call as expected.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the reported modifications and likely allows for more flexible test scenarios.
219-219: LGTM: Consistent update to function call.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous test function and maintains uniformity across the test suite.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_abci_versions.rs (1)
341-341: LGTM. Please provide more context about the new feature.The addition of the
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsfield to theDriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersionsstruct is consistent with the PR's objective of implementing withdrawal retries. This change allows for versioning of the new functionality, which is a good practice for maintaining backward compatibility and enabling gradual rollout.To ensure comprehensive documentation and understanding of this new feature:
- Could you provide a brief description of how the
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsfunctionality works?- Are there any specific conditions or scenarios where this rebroadcasting occurs?
- How does this feature interact with the existing withdrawal process?
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/initialization/v0/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
202-231: Summary: Changes look good, but consider enhancing documentation and test coverageThe modifications to both test functions are consistent and don't affect the core test logic. However, to improve the overall quality of the codebase:
- Document the new parameter in
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure, explaining its purpose and possible values.- Add test cases that use non-None values for this parameter to ensure comprehensive coverage.
- Consider using a constant for the
Nonevalue if it's used frequently in tests.- Add brief comments in the test functions explaining the use of
Noneas the default value.These enhancements will make the code more maintainable and easier to understand for future developers working on this module.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/update/mod.rs (6)
144-144: LGTM. Verify if cost estimation is affected.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with previous test cases and aligns with the test's purpose of estimating costs without state.To ensure the cost estimation hasn't been affected, please run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Compare the cost estimation before and after the change. # Test: Run the specific test and capture its output cargo test --package rs-drive --lib "drive::identity::update::tests::add_new_keys_to_identity::should_estimated_costs_without_state" -- --nocapture > test_output.txt 2>&1 # Check: Extract and compare the FeeResult grep "FeeResult" test_output.txt # Note: Compare the extracted FeeResult with the expected values in the test: # FeeResult { # storage_fee: 17145000, # processing_fee: 5483620, # ..Default::default() # } echo "Please manually verify that the extracted FeeResult matches the expected values in the test."
390-390: LGTM. Verify revision update functionality.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with previous test cases.To ensure the revision update functionality hasn't been affected, please run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the revision update functionality and fee calculation. # Test: Run the specific test and capture its output cargo test --package rs-drive --lib "drive::identity::update::tests::update_identity_revision::should_update_revision" -- --nocapture > test_output.txt 2>&1 # Check: Ensure the test passed if grep -q "test result: ok" test_output.txt; then echo "Test passed successfully." else echo "Test failed. Please review the output in test_output.txt" fi # Check: Verify the updated revision grep "assert_eq!(updated_revision, Some(revision))" test_output.txt # Check: Verify the fee calculation grep "FeeResult" test_output.txt echo "Please manually verify that the revision update and fee calculation are correct."
24-24: Verify the impact of theNoneparameter on test setup.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent across multiple tests. This modification may affect how the initial state is set up for testing.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects, please run the following verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the test still passes and check for any changes in test output or performance. # Test: Run the specific test and capture its output cargo test --package rs-drive --lib "drive::identity::update::tests::add_new_keys_to_identity::should_add_one_new_key_to_identity" -- --nocapture > test_output.txt 2>&1 # Check: Ensure the test passed if grep -q "test result: ok" test_output.txt; then echo "Test passed successfully." else echo "Test failed. Please review the output in test_output.txt" fi # Optional: Compare test duration with previous runs if available # This step depends on how you track test performance over time
Line range hint
24-450: Summary: Consistent changes to test setup across all cases.All modifications in this file involve passing
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureacross various test cases. This consistent change suggests a deliberate modification to the test setup process.While these changes appear safe and are consistently applied, it's crucial to ensure they don't introduce any unintended side effects.
To ensure the overall integrity of the test suite, please run a comprehensive test verification:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Run all tests in the file and compare results with previous runs. # Test: Run all tests in the file cargo test --package rs-drive --lib "drive::identity::update::tests" -- --nocapture > test_output.txt 2>&1 # Check: Ensure all tests passed if grep -q "test result: ok" test_output.txt; then echo "All tests passed successfully." else echo "Some tests failed. Please review the output in test_output.txt" fi # Check: Compare test durations with previous runs (if available) # This step depends on how you track test performance over time echo "Please manually review the test output for any unexpected changes in behavior or performance."After running these verifications, if all tests pass and there are no unexpected changes in behavior or performance, we can be confident that the modifications haven't introduced any regressions.
203-203: LGTM. Verify key disabling functionality.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with previous test cases.To ensure the key disabling functionality hasn't been affected, please run the following verification:
84-84: LGTM. Consider consistency check across all test cases.The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structureis consistent with the previous test case. This modification maintains consistency in how the initial state is set up for testing across different scenarios.To ensure consistency across all test cases, please run the following verification:
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/engine/run_block_proposal/v0/mod.rs (1)
272-279: LGTM! Verify the impact of rebroadcasting expired withdrawals.The addition of
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsis well-placed in the block proposal execution flow. It's called after updating the validator proposed app version and before marking previously broadcasted and chainlocked withdrawals as complete, which seems logical.To ensure this addition doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior, please run the following verification:
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/mod.rs (5)
118-118: LGTM. Change is consistent.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with other changes in the file and appears to be correct for this actively used function.
141-141: LGTM. Change is consistent.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is in line with other updates in the file and appears to be correct for this actively used function.
162-162: LGTM. Change is consistent.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with other changes in the file and appears to be correct for this actively used function.
444-444: LGTM. Verify test results for both functions.The modifications to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)in bothtest_create_reference_contract_with_history_without_applyandtest_update_reference_contract_without_applyare consistent with other updates in the file. As these are test functions, please ensure that both tests still pass and produce the expected results after these changes.#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that both tests still pass after the changes # Test 1: Run test_create_reference_contract_with_history_without_apply cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::contract::tests::test_create_reference_contract_with_history_without_apply -- --exact # Test 2: Run test_update_reference_contract_without_apply cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::contract::tests::test_update_reference_contract_without_apply -- --exactAlso applies to: 467-467
422-422: LGTM. Verify test results.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with other updates in the file. As this is a test function, please ensure that the test still passes and produces the expected results after this change.packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/get_fetch/get_contract_with_fetch_info/mod.rs (1)
Line range hint
251-283: Summary of changes and request for additional contextThe modifications in both test functions (
should_return_none_if_contract_not_existandshould_return_fees_for_non_existing_contract_if_epoch_is_passed) involve updating thesetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call to passNoneas an argument. While these changes don't alter the intent or behavior of the tests, they seem to be part of a broader modification in how the initial state structure is set up for tests.To ensure a comprehensive understanding of these changes:
- Could you provide more context on why
Noneis now being passed tosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structure?- Are there any implications or benefits of this change that should be noted?
- Have similar changes been made in other test files? If so, it might be worth considering a global comment or documentation update to explain this new pattern.
To check if similar changes have been made in other test files, we can run the following script:
This will help us understand if this is a localized change or part of a broader refactoring effort.
✅ Verification successful
Confirmed Consistent Update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)The change to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehas been uniformly applied across multiple test and source files. This consistent refactoring indicates an intentional standardization of the drive initialization process without introducing unintended side effects.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None) rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(None\)" --type rustLength of output: 19991
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/contract/get_fetch/fetch_contract_with_history/mod.rs (1)
259-259: Verify the impact of this change on existing testsThe modification to pass
Nonetosetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehas been noted. This change could potentially affect the behavior of all tests using this setup function.To ensure this change doesn't introduce unintended side effects:
- Verify that all existing tests still pass with this modification.
- Check if any tests rely on a specific initial state that might now be affected.
Additionally, consider updating the function documentation to reflect this change if necessary.
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified
All existing tests use
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurewithNoneas the argument, consistent with the recent modification. No impact on existing test behavior detected.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in tests # Test: Search for all occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in test files rg --type rust -g '**/tests/**' 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure' # Test: Check if there are any failing tests after this change cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::contract::get_fetch::fetch_contract_with_history -- --nocaptureLength of output: 1572
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Analyze the usage patterns of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in tests # Extract all calls to setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure with their arguments ast-grep --lang rust --pattern 'setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure($_)' > setup_usage_patterns.txt # Display the unique argument patterns used in setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure calls awk -F'[()]' '{print $2}' setup_usage_patterns.txt | sort | uniq -cLength of output: 162
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/insert/mod.rs (8)
253-253: LGTM. Consistent change in test setup.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous change and doesn't appear to affect the test logic.
318-318: LGTM. Consistent modification in test setup.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous modifications and doesn't appear to affect the test logic.
383-383: LGTM. Consistent change in test initialization.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous changes and doesn't appear to affect the test logic.
448-448: LGTM. Consistent modification in test setup.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous modifications and doesn't appear to affect the test logic.
524-524: LGTM. Consistent change in test initialization.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous changes and doesn't appear to affect the test logic.
Line range hint
157-617: Summary: Consistent modifications to test setup across multiple functions.The changes in this file consistently modify the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call to includeNoneas an argument across multiple test functions. While these changes appear straightforward and don't seem to affect the core logic of the tests, it's important to ensure that this new parameter doesn't introduce any unintended side effects across the test suite.To ensure the changes don't have any unexpected impacts, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the overall impact of changes on the test suite. # Test: Run the entire test suite for the rs-drive package cargo test --package rs-drive # Test: Check for any usage of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in the entire project rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure" "packages/rs-drive/" # Test: Verify if there are any remaining calls without the None argument rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\)" "packages/rs-drive/"This script will help ensure that all instances of
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurehave been updated consistently and that the changes don't negatively impact the overall test suite.
617-617: LGTM. Consistent change in test setup. Verify all modifications.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous changes and doesn't appear to affect the test logic. As this is the last modified function, it's a good opportunity to verify the impact of all changes.To ensure all changes are consistent and don't negatively impact the tests, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of all changes on test setup and execution. # Test: Run all modified tests to ensure they still pass. cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::document::insert::tests::test_add_dashpay_documents cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::document::insert::tests::test_add_dashpay_contact_request_with_fee cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::document::insert::tests::test_add_dashpay_profile_with_fee cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::document::insert::tests::test_add_dashpay_profile_average_case_cost_fee cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::document::insert::tests::test_unknown_state_cost_dashpay_fee_for_add_documents cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::document::insert::tests::test_add_dashpay_fee_for_documents_detail cargo test --package rs-drive --lib drive::document::insert::tests::test_add_dpns_document_with_fee # Test: Check for any remaining instances of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure without the None argument rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(\)" "packages/rs-drive/src/drive/"
157-157: LGTM. Verify impact on test setup.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. This change suggests that the function now accepts an optional parameter, potentially allowing for more flexible test configurations.To ensure this change doesn't affect the test behavior, please run the following script:
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/balance/update.rs (15)
25-25: LGTM: Standardized drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structurestandardizes the drive initialization across tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
92-92: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
114-114: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
197-197: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
276-276: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
340-340: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
484-484: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
508-508: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
573-573: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
593-593: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
668-668: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
737-737: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
791-791: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
864-864: LGTM: Consistent drive setupThe change to include
Noneas an argument insetup_drive_with_initial_state_structuremaintains consistency with other tests. This modification doesn't affect the test logic or assertions.
Line range hint
1-893: Summary: Standardized drive setup across all testsThe changes in this file consistently update the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call to include aNoneargument across all test functions. This standardization improves consistency in the test setup without affecting the test logic or assertions.A minor typo was found in one function name (
should_estimated_costs_without_state), which should be corrected as previously noted.Overall, these changes are beneficial for maintaining a consistent testing environment across all identity balance operation tests.
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/delete/mod.rs (4)
325-325: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the changes observed earlier in the file.
509-509: LGTM. Maintains consistency with previous changes.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is in line with the changes made in other test functions.
784-784: LGTM. Consistent modification across test functions.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)maintains consistency with the updates made in other test functions.
184-184: LGTM. Verify consistent usage across the codebase.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good and is consistent with the expected modifications.To ensure this change has been applied consistently, run the following script:
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/credit_pools/epochs/operations_factory.rs (8)
318-318: LGTM: Setup function refactored.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)appears to be a refactoring of the setup function. This modification doesn't affect the test's logic or purpose and is consistent with best practices for flexible test setups.
361-361: LGTM: Consistent setup function refactoring.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous test function. This refactoring maintains uniformity across test cases and doesn't alter the test's functionality.
448-448: LGTM: Setup function refactoring consistent across modules.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)maintains consistency with previous changes. This refactoring is applied uniformly across different test modules, which is a good practice for maintaining test consistency and readability.
483-483: LGTM: Consistent setup refactoring maintained.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)continues the pattern of consistent refactoring across different test functions and modules. This uniformity in test setup enhances code maintainability and readability.
564-564: LGTM: Setup refactoring consistency maintained across varied test scenarios.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)continues the pattern of consistent refactoring, even in this different test scenario. This uniformity across varied test cases demonstrates a systematic approach to test setup, which is commendable.
636-636: LGTM: Consistent setup refactoring across all test modules.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)maintains the pattern of consistent refactoring seen across all previous test functions and modules. This systematic approach to updating the test setup enhances the overall consistency and maintainability of the test suite.
671-671: LGTM: Consistent setup refactoring completed across entire test suite.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)in this test function completes the consistent pattern of refactoring seen throughout the entire file. This systematic update to all test setups demonstrates a thorough and methodical approach to code maintenance, which is highly commendable.
Line range hint
318-908: Excellent refactoring of test setup across the entire file.The changes in this file demonstrate a systematic and consistent refactoring of the test setup function
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)across all test modules and functions. This uniform update achieves several positive outcomes:
- Improved consistency in test setups, making the code more maintainable.
- Potential for more flexible test configurations in the future.
- Enhanced readability of the test suite.
The consistency of these changes indicates a thorough and methodical approach to code maintenance, which is commendable. This refactoring lays a good foundation for future improvements or extensions to the test suite.
packages/rs-drive/src/util/batch/drive_op_batch/mod.rs (7)
232-232: LGTM: Consistent update to setup function call.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with updates in other test functions. This modification likely reflects a refactor of the setup function to accept an optional parameter.
339-339: LGTM: Consistent update to setup function call.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the updates in other test functions, maintaining uniformity across the test suite.
438-438: LGTM: Consistent update to setup function call.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)aligns with the changes in other test functions, ensuring consistency throughout the test suite.
571-571: LGTM: Consistent update to setup function call.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)maintains consistency with the modifications in other test functions, ensuring a uniform approach across the test suite.
682-682: LGTM: Consistent update to setup function call.The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is in line with the changes made in other test functions, maintaining a consistent approach throughout the test suite.
900-900: LGTM: Consistent update to setup function call.The change to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the modifications in other test functions, ensuring a uniform approach across the entire test suite.
Line range hint
232-900: Summary: Consistent updates to setup function across all testsThe changes in this file are limited to updating the
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structurefunction call in all test functions. Each call now includesNoneas an argument. This consistent modification across the entire test suite suggests a refactoring of the setup function to accept an optional parameter.Key observations:
- The change is uniform across all test functions.
- No other modifications were made to the test logic or assertions.
- The core functionality being tested remains unchanged.
These updates appear to be part of a broader refactoring effort. The consistency of the changes and the preservation of existing test logic indicate a well-executed refactor that maintains the integrity of the test suite.
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v2.rs (5)
477-478: New withdrawal transaction queue methods added. Please provide more context.The addition of
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationssuggests new functionalities for managing withdrawal transactions. These appear to be good additions for improving the withdrawal process.Could you please provide more information about the specific scenarios where these new operations will be used?
678-678: New functionality for rebroadcasting expired withdrawal documents added.The addition of
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentssuggests a new feature for handling expired withdrawal documents. This appears to be a good addition for improving the robustness of the withdrawal process.Could you please provide more details about the conditions under which withdrawal documents expire and the process for rebroadcasting them?
855-855: Core expiration blocks doubled from 24 to 48.The
core_expiration_blocksvalue has been increased from 24 to 48. This change could potentially impact the duration for which certain withdrawal-related operations are considered valid.Could you please explain the reasoning behind doubling this value and any potential impacts on the withdrawal process or system performance?
1298-1298: New limit added for retrying signing of expired withdrawal documents.A new limit
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limithas been introduced with a value of 1. This suggests a cautious approach to retrying the signing of expired withdrawal documents.Could you please provide more information about:
- The process of retrying signing for expired withdrawal documents?
- Why the limit is set to 1 per block?
- How this interacts with the
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsfunctionality added earlier?
Line range hint
477-1298: Overall improvements to withdrawal functionalityThe changes introduced in this update collectively enhance the withdrawal process:
- New queue management methods for broadcasted transactions
- Functionality to rebroadcast expired withdrawal documents
- Increased core expiration time
- Limited retries for signing expired withdrawal documents
These improvements appear to make the withdrawal system more robust and flexible while maintaining caution in critical areas.
To ensure a comprehensive understanding of these changes:
- Could you provide a high-level overview of how these changes work together to improve the withdrawal process?
- Are there any potential performance implications, especially with the increased core expiration time?
- Have these changes been thoroughly tested in a staging environment to ensure they don't introduce any unintended side effects?
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v2_test.rs (2)
1296-1296: LGTM. Consider documenting the new limit and verifying its impact.The addition of
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitwith a value of 1 is approved. This introduces a limit on retrying the signing of expired withdrawal documents per block.Consider adding inline documentation to explain the rationale behind this limit and its implications on the system's behavior.
Please verify that this limit aligns with the system's capacity and doesn't introduce bottlenecks in processing expired withdrawal documents. Run the following script to check for related configurations:
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful:
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitis consistently applied across the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents and related configurations rg --type rust "retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents|withdrawal.*limit" -C 3Length of output: 47276
856-856: LGTM. Verify impact of doubling core expiration blocks.The change of
core_expiration_blocksfrom 24 to 48 is approved. This doubles the number of blocks for core expiration in withdrawal constants.Please verify the impact of this change on the withdrawal process timing and ensure it aligns with the intended behavior. Run the following script to check for any related configurations or usages:
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v4.rs (2)
1300-1300: LGTM. Please provide more details on the retry mechanism.The addition of
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitwith a value of 1 is a good measure to control the retrying of expired withdrawal document signing. This cautious approach could help in managing system resources effectively.Could you please provide more information about this new retry mechanism:
- What triggers a retry attempt?
- How are expired withdrawal documents identified?
- What happens if the retry limit is reached in a block?
- Were any performance tests conducted to determine the optimal limit of 1?
To help verify the implementation, you could run the following script to search for related code:
#!/bin/bash # Search for code related to retrying expired withdrawal documents rg -i "retry.*expired.*withdrawal" --type rust
857-857: LGTM. Please provide context for the increased expiration period.The
core_expiration_blocksvalue has been doubled from 24 to 48. This change extends the expiration period, which could be beneficial for handling network delays or other issues in the withdrawal process.Could you please provide more context on why this value was increased? It would be helpful to understand:
- What specific problems this change addresses
- Any potential impacts on the overall withdrawal process duration
- If any performance tests were conducted to validate this change
To help verify the impact, you could run the following script to check for any related comments or discussions:
packages/rs-drive/src/drive/document/update/mod.rs (4)
676-676: LGTM. Consistent with previous change.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous change and looks good.
765-765: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous changes and looks good.
1818-1818: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes. Verify overall impact.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)is consistent with the previous changes and looks good.To ensure all test functions have been updated consistently, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if all occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in test functions have been updated rg "fn test_.*\n.*setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rust
517-517: LGTM. Verify the impact of this change.The update to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)looks good. This change allows for more flexibility in setting up the initial state structure for the test.To ensure this change doesn't affect other parts of the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Change Verified: Impact Limited to Test Files
The modification to
setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure(None)has been confirmed to affect only test functions without impacting production code.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rustLength of output: 267
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test functions that call setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure rg "fn test_.*\n.*setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rust --multilineLength of output: 21989
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in non-test Rust files rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rust ! -g "*tests/*"Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in non-test Rust files rg "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\(" --type rust --glob '!tests/*'Length of output: 20101
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/mod.rs (3)
1-14: Module imports and declarations are correctAll necessary modules and dependencies are properly imported, and version modules
v0andv1are correctly declared.
33-63: Function implementation is correct and follows best practicesThe
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsfunction is well-implemented, with appropriate error handling and version management.
46-51: Verify consistency of parameters in version-specific method callsIn the match statement, the call to
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v0includeslast_committed_platform_state, whereas the call torebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v1does not. Please verify if omittinglast_committed_platform_statein the version 1 method call is intentional, or if it should be included for consistency.Run the following script to check the parameters required by
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v1:Also applies to: 52-56
✅ Verification successful
Consistency of Parameters in
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsMethod Calls VerifiedThe
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v1method does not require thelast_committed_platform_stateparameter, confirming that its omission is intentional and aligns with the method's signature.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the function signature of `rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v1` # Test: Find the function definition to confirm the required parameters rg --type rust -A 5 'fn rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents_v1'Length of output: 984
packages/rs-drive-abci/src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/update_broadcasted_withdrawal_statuses/v0/mod.rs (1)
150-156:⚠️ Potential issueHandle potential errors from removal operations
Ensure that the result of
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsis properly handled. If it returns an error, it should be propagated or managed accordingly.Apply the
?operator to propagate errors:self.drive .remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operations( chainlocked_indexes, &mut drive_operations, platform_version, - )?; + )?;Confirm that this function returns a
Resultand that any errors are correctly handled upstream.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/mod.rs (1)
129-131: New modulebatch_move_items_in_path_queryadded successfullyThe module
batch_move_items_in_path_queryis properly declared, and the documentation comment clearly describes its purpose.packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs (4)
1298-1298: LGTM!The addition of
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitwith a value of 1 aligns with the system limits configuration.
678-678: Confirm version initialization for new methodThe new field
rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documentsis added with version number 0. Please ensure that initializing at version 0 is consistent with the existing versioning scheme in the withdrawal processing section.Run the following script to check method versions in
DriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersions:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify method versions in DriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersions ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'DriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersions { $$$ }' packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rs
855-855: Verify the impact of increasingcore_expiration_blocksThe
core_expiration_blocksvalue has been increased from 24 to 48. This change doubles the expiration period for core-related operations. Please confirm that this adjustment is intentional and assess whether any dependent systems or configurations need to be updated accordingly.Run the following script to find all usages of
core_expiration_blocksin the codebase:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all usages of `core_expiration_blocks` to assess impact rg 'core_expiration_blocks'
477-478: Confirm version initialization for new methodsThe new fields
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsare initialized with version number 0. Please confirm that starting at version 0 aligns with the versioning conventions used in the codebase.Run the following script to list existing method versions in
DriveIdentityWithdrawalTransactionQueueMethodVersionsand verify consistency:✅ Verification successful
Next Steps: Verify version initialization in
DriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersionsThe specified struct
DriveIdentityWithdrawalTransactionQueueMethodVersionswas not found. It appears you may need to verify the version initialization forDriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersionsinstead.
Version initialization is consistent with existing conventions.
The new fields
remove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_after_completion_operationsandmove_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operationsare initialized with version number 0, which aligns with the current versioning used inDriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersions.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List existing method versions in DriveIdentityWithdrawalTransactionQueueMethodVersions ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'DriveIdentityWithdrawalTransactionQueueMethodVersions { $$$ }' packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rsLength of output: 1380
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List existing method versions in DriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersions ast-grep --lang rust --pattern $'DriveAbciIdentityCreditWithdrawalMethodVersions { $$$ }' packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/v1.rsLength of output: 1265
packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/mocks/v3_test.rs (1)
1299-1299: Confirm Appropriateness ofretry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitThe new limit
retry_signing_expired_withdrawal_documents_per_block_limitis set to1. Verify that this value is suitable for the system's operational capacity and that it effectively balances retry opportunities with system performance and throughput.To confirm the usage and implications of this new limit, you can run the following script:
packages/rs-drive-abci/tests/strategy_tests/withdrawal_tests.rs (1)
1160-1160: Verify alignment ofcore_height_startwithchain_lock.block_heightAt line 1160,
core_height_startis set to50inChainExecutionParameters. Ensure this value correctly corresponds with the updatedchain_lock.block_heightfor the test scenario simulating withdrawal expiration.
| if !indexes.is_empty() { | ||
| drive_operation_types.push(DriveOperation::WithdrawalOperation( | ||
| WithdrawalOperationType::MoveBroadcastedWithdrawalTransactionsBackToQueueForResigning { | ||
| indexes, | ||
| }, | ||
| )); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adding error handling or logging.
The current implementation doesn't include any error handling or logging. While this might be intentional, consider adding some level of logging or error handling to improve debuggability and robustness. For example:
- Log when transactions are moved back to the queue.
- Consider what should happen if
drive_operation_types.push()fails (e.g., out of memory).
Here's a suggestion to add basic logging:
use log::debug;
// Inside the method
if !indexes.is_empty() {
debug!("Moving {} broadcasted withdrawal transactions back to queue", indexes.len());
drive_operation_types.push(DriveOperation::WithdrawalOperation(
WithdrawalOperationType::MoveBroadcastedWithdrawalTransactionsBackToQueueForResigning {
indexes,
},
));
}This addition would provide valuable information for debugging and monitoring the system's behavior.
...src/execution/platform_events/withdrawals/rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents/v0/mod.rs
Show resolved
Hide resolved
| pub fn setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure( | ||
| specific_platform_version: Option<&PlatformVersion>, | ||
| ) -> Drive { | ||
| let drive = setup_drive(Some(DriveConfig { | ||
| batching_consistency_verification: true, | ||
| ..Default::default() | ||
| })); | ||
|
|
||
| let platform_version = PlatformVersion::latest(); | ||
| let platform_version = specific_platform_version.unwrap_or(PlatformVersion::latest()); | ||
| drive | ||
| .create_initial_state_structure(None, platform_version) | ||
| .expect("should create root tree successfully"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update other setup functions for consistency
The function setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure now accepts an optional PlatformVersion parameter, while other setup functions like setup_system_data_contract and setup_document do not. To maintain consistency across the API, consider refactoring these functions to also accept an optional platform version parameter.
- Affected functions:
setup_system_data_contractsetup_document
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider updating other setup functions for consistency
The change to setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure is good, but it introduces an inconsistency with other setup functions in this file. Consider updating setup_system_data_contract and setup_document to also accept an optional platform version parameter for consistency across the API.
Here's a suggested change for setup_system_data_contract:
pub fn setup_system_data_contract(
drive: &Drive,
data_contract: &DataContract,
transaction: TransactionArg,
specific_platform_version: Option<&PlatformVersion>,
) {
let platform_version = specific_platform_version.unwrap_or(PlatformVersion::latest());
// ... (rest of the function remains the same)
}Apply a similar change to setup_document as well.
Let's check for usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure and check if they need updating
# Search for function calls
echo "Usages of setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure:"
rg --type rust "setup_drive_with_initial_state_structure\s*\(" -A 2
Length of output: 50016
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@QuantumExplorer, understood. Thank you for considering my suggestion.
(˘︹˘)🐰
| use crate::error::drive::DriveError; | ||
| use crate::error::Error; | ||
| use crate::fees::op::LowLevelDriveOperation; | ||
| use crate::util::grove_operations::{BatchDeleteApplyType, BatchMoveApplyType}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import BatchDeleteApplyType.
The import BatchDeleteApplyType is not used in this module and can be safely removed to clean up the code.
Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-use crate::util::grove_operations::{BatchDeleteApplyType, BatchMoveApplyType};
+use crate::util::grove_operations::BatchMoveApplyType;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| use crate::util::grove_operations::{BatchDeleteApplyType, BatchMoveApplyType}; | |
| use crate::util::grove_operations::BatchMoveApplyType; |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive-abci) / Linting
[warning] 7-7: unused import:
BatchDeleteApplyType
warning: unused import:BatchDeleteApplyType
--> packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs:7:37
|
7 | use crate::util::grove_operations::{BatchDeleteApplyType, BatchMoveApplyType};
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
🪛 GitHub Check: Rust packages (drive) / Linting
[warning] 7-7: unused import:
BatchDeleteApplyType
warning: unused import:BatchDeleteApplyType
--> packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs:7:37
|
7 | use crate::util::grove_operations::{BatchDeleteApplyType, BatchMoveApplyType};
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| match drive_version | ||
| .grove_methods | ||
| .batch | ||
| .batch_delete_items_in_path_query | ||
| { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the version field in the match statement.
The match statement is using batch_delete_items_in_path_query, which seems incorrect for this method. It should reference batch_move_items_in_path_query to align with the current function.
Apply this diff to correct the version field:
match drive_version
.grove_methods
.batch
- .batch_delete_items_in_path_query
+ .batch_move_items_in_path_query
{📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| match drive_version | |
| .grove_methods | |
| .batch | |
| .batch_delete_items_in_path_query | |
| { | |
| match drive_version | |
| .grove_methods | |
| .batch | |
| .batch_move_items_in_path_query | |
| { |
| is_sum_tree: bool, | ||
| /// What is the estimated value size | ||
| estimated_key_size: u32, | ||
| /// What is the estimated value size | ||
| estimated_value_size: u32, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct documentation comments for BatchMoveApplyType fields
There are inaccuracies in the documentation comments for the fields in the StatelessBatchMove variant:
- The comment for
is_sum_treecurrently reads "Are we deleting in a sum tree". It should be updated to reflect that this field indicates whether we are moving in a sum tree. - The comment for
estimated_key_sizeincorrectly says "What is the estimated value size". It should say "What is the estimated key size".
Apply the following diff to correct the comments:
/// Does this tree use sums?
in_tree_using_sums: bool,
- /// Are we deleting in a sum tree
+ /// Are we moving in a sum tree
is_sum_tree: bool,
- /// What is the estimated value size
+ /// What is the estimated key size
estimated_key_size: u32,
/// What is the estimated value size
estimated_value_size: u32,📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| is_sum_tree: bool, | |
| /// What is the estimated value size | |
| estimated_key_size: u32, | |
| /// What is the estimated value size | |
| estimated_value_size: u32, | |
| /// Does this tree use sums? | |
| in_tree_using_sums: bool, | |
| /// Are we moving in a sum tree | |
| is_sum_tree: bool, | |
| /// What is the estimated key size | |
| estimated_key_size: u32, | |
| /// What is the estimated value size | |
| estimated_value_size: u32, |
| // Insert elements that will be moved | ||
| let path = vec![b"root".to_vec()]; | ||
| let new_path = vec![b"new_root".to_vec()]; | ||
| let key1 = b"key1".to_vec(); | ||
| let key2 = b"key2".to_vec(); | ||
| let element1 = Element::new_item(b"value1".to_vec()); | ||
| let element2 = Element::new_item(b"value2".to_vec()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Insert the root tree and new root tree | ||
| drive | ||
| .grove_insert_empty_tree( | ||
| SubtreePath::empty(), | ||
| b"root", | ||
| Some(&transaction), | ||
| None, | ||
| &mut vec![], | ||
| &platform_version.drive, | ||
| ) | ||
| .expect("expected to insert root tree"); | ||
|
|
||
| drive | ||
| .grove_insert_empty_tree( | ||
| SubtreePath::empty(), | ||
| b"new_root", | ||
| Some(&transaction), | ||
| None, | ||
| &mut vec![], | ||
| &platform_version.drive, | ||
| ) | ||
| .expect("expected to insert new root tree"); | ||
|
|
||
| drive | ||
| .grove | ||
| .insert( | ||
| path.as_slice(), | ||
| &key1, | ||
| element1.clone(), | ||
| None, | ||
| Some(&transaction), | ||
| &platform_version.drive.grove_version, | ||
| ) | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .expect("expected to insert element1"); | ||
|
|
||
| drive | ||
| .grove | ||
| .insert( | ||
| path.as_slice(), | ||
| &key2, | ||
| element2.clone(), | ||
| None, | ||
| Some(&transaction), | ||
| &platform_version.drive.grove_version, | ||
| ) | ||
| .unwrap() | ||
| .expect("expected to insert element2"); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor test setup code to reduce duplication
The test functions test_batch_move_items_in_path_query_success and test_batch_move_items_in_path_query_range_query contain duplicated code for setting up the test environment, such as inserting trees and elements. Refactoring this common setup code into helper functions would improve maintainability and reduce code duplication.
Consider creating helper functions for:
- Inserting root trees.
- Inserting elements into trees.
This would make the tests cleaner and easier to maintain.
Also applies to: 358-428
| if path_query.query.limit == None { | ||
| Error::Drive(DriveError::NotSupported( | ||
| "Limits are required for path_query", | ||
| )); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Missing return statement when error condition is met
In the condition where path_query.query.limit is None, the function constructs an error but does not return it. This means the function will continue execution even when it should terminate with an error.
Apply the following diff to return the error properly:
if path_query.query.limit == None {
- Error::Drive(DriveError::NotSupported(
+ return Err(Error::Drive(DriveError::NotSupported(
"Limits are required for path_query",
- ));
+ )));
}This ensures that the function exits with the intended error when the limit is not set.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if path_query.query.limit == None { | |
| Error::Drive(DriveError::NotSupported( | |
| "Limits are required for path_query", | |
| )); | |
| } | |
| if path_query.query.limit == None { | |
| return Err(Error::Drive(DriveError::NotSupported( | |
| "Limits are required for path_query", | |
| ))); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/mod.rs (1)
195-216: LGTM: New enumBatchMoveApplyTypewith minor comment suggestionThe new
BatchMoveApplyTypeenum is well-structured and consistent with other similar enums in the file. It provides the necessary information for both stateless and stateful batch move operations.However, there's a minor inconsistency in the comment for the
is_sum_treefield:Consider updating the comment for the
is_sum_treefield to be more accurate:- /// Are we moving a sum tree + /// Are we moving in a sum tree is_sum_tree: bool,This change would make it consistent with the comment style used in other similar enums.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- packages/rs-drive-abci/tests/strategy_tests/withdrawal_tests.rs (4 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/v0/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/mod.rs (3 hunks)
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_versions.rs (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- packages/rs-drive/src/drive/identity/withdrawals/transaction/queue/move_broadcasted_withdrawal_transactions_back_to_queue_operations/v0/mod.rs
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/mod.rs
- packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/batch_move_items_in_path_query/v0/mod.rs
- packages/rs-platform-version/src/version/drive_versions.rs
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/rs-drive/src/util/grove_operations/mod.rs (2)
129-130: LGTM: New module for batch moving itemsThe addition of the
batch_move_items_in_path_querymodule aligns well with the PR objectives. It provides functionality to move items found in a path query to a new path, which should enhance the flexibility of withdrawal transaction handling.
Line range hint
1-516: Summary: Well-structured additions for batch move operationsThe changes in this file are focused on adding new functionality for batch move operations, which aligns well with the PR objectives of improving withdrawal transaction handling. The additions are well-structured and consistent with the existing codebase. The new
batch_move_items_in_path_querymodule andBatchMoveApplyTypeenum provide the necessary components for implementing the batch move functionality.A minor suggestion was made to improve the consistency of a comment, but overall, the changes look good and are ready for integration.
packages/rs-drive-abci/tests/strategy_tests/withdrawal_tests.rs (5)
799-799: Initialization ofchain_lock.block_heightThe
block_heightin thechain_lockis correctly initialized to1, ensuring the core state's starting height is properly set.
1123-1123: Ensurechain_locked_heightis updated consistentlyAt line 1123,
core_state.chain_lock.block_heightis set to50, but the variablechain_locked_heightremains at1. To maintain consistency and avoid potential discrepancies in the test logic, consider updatingchain_locked_heightto match the newchain_lock.block_height.
1140-1153: Verification of variables inChainExecutionOutcomeThe destructuring of
ChainExecutionOutcomecorrectly captures the necessary variables for the subsequent test steps. Ensure that all variables are utilized appropriately in the code that follows.
1158-1158: Verify consistency ofcore_height_startwithchain_lock.block_heightAt line 1158,
core_height_startis set to50. Ensure that this value is consistent withcore_state.chain_lock.block_height, which is also set to50. This consistency is crucial for the test to simulate the correct chain state.
1235-1329: Refactor repetitive blocks into a helper functionThe code between lines 1235-1329 repeats similar logic for running blocks and verifying withdrawal document statuses. For improved readability and maintainability, consider refactoring this code into a reusable helper function.
|
Going to merge this in, @shumkov please review when you can. |
| @@ -44,125 +44,8 @@ where | |||
| ); | |||
| /// # Parameters | ||
| /// - `block_info`: Information about the current block (e.g., timestamp). | ||
| /// - `transaction`: The transaction within which the rebroadcast should be executed. | ||
| /// - `platform_version`: The version of the platform, used to determine the correct method implementation. |
| // Collecting unique withdrawal indices of expired documents | ||
| let expired_withdrawal_indices: Vec<WithdrawalTransactionIndex> = | ||
| expired_withdrawal_documents_to_retry_signing | ||
| .iter() | ||
| .map(|document| { | ||
| document | ||
| .properties() | ||
| .get_optional_u64(withdrawal::properties::TRANSACTION_INDEX)? | ||
| .ok_or(Error::Execution(ExecutionError::CorruptedDriveResponse( | ||
| "Can't get transaction index from withdrawal document".to_string(), | ||
| ))) | ||
| }) | ||
| .collect::<Result<BTreeSet<WithdrawalTransactionIndex>, Error>>()? | ||
| .into_iter() | ||
| .collect(); | ||
|
|
| @@ -137,6 +147,13 @@ where | |||
| return Ok(()); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| self.drive | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We intentionally do not remove completed documents. It's by design. Please check DIP. It's done for clients that can see the history of withdrawls and remove completed withdrawals using documnent delete transition. We have specified Data Trigger for this.
| /// Deletes the withdrawal transactions from the main queue and adds them to the broadcasted queue | ||
| MoveBroadcastedWithdrawalTransactionsBackToQueueForResigning { | ||
| /// A vector of the indexes to be moved | ||
| indexes: Vec<WithdrawalTransactionIndex>, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@QuantumExplorer yeah, it seems here is right
| /// Stateful batch move | ||
| StatefulBatchMove { | ||
| /// Are we known to be in a subtree and does this subtree have sums | ||
| is_known_to_be_subtree_with_sum: Option<(IsSubTree, IsSumSubTree)>, |
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
This PR addresses the handling of expired and broadcasted withdrawal transactions, focusing on rebroadcasting expired transactions and managing broadcasted transactions.
What was done?
Introduced rebroadcast_expired_withdrawal_documents
Added operations for efficiently managing transaction state changes and moving transactions between queues (e.g., rebroadcast, queue for resigning, or deleting completed transactions).
How Has This Been Tested?
Added to strategy tests.
Breaking Changes
This is a breaking change that will be marked as active in v1.4
Checklist:
For repository code-owners and collaborators only
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores