Skip to content

Conversation

@UdjinM6
Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 commented Nov 27, 2025

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

pull_request doesn't have enough permissions. Only works for a branch in the same repo e.g. https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/19731863320.

#6951 follow-up

What was done?

How Has This Been Tested?

For a branch from a forked repo UdjinM6#24:
develop: https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/19732188359?pr=24
this PR (develop in my repo updated with this patch): https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/19732354343?pr=24

Breaking Changes

n/a

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 added this to the 23.1 milestone Nov 27, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2025

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions workflow configuration in .github/workflows/guix-build.yml was restructured to flatten the event trigger hierarchy. Previously, a nested pull_request block existed under on.pull_request_target with a types: [labeled] filter. This configuration was moved so the event type filter now applies directly to pull_request_target at the top level. The workflow logic, steps, and push trigger remain unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Single file with minimal structural reorganization
  • No functional logic changes or behavioral impact
  • Simple YAML hierarchy flattening

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: removing the pull_request trigger from guix-build.yml in favor of pull_request_target.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is directly related to the changeset, explaining the permissions issue with pull_request and providing test results demonstrating the fix.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3b9c29d and 01336d8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/guix-build.yml (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/guix-build.yml

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@github-actions
Copy link

✅ No Merge Conflicts Detected

This PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs.

@DashCoreAutoGuix
Copy link

Guix Automation has began to build this PR tagged as v23.0.0-devpr7014.01336d8b. A new comment will be made when the image is pushed.

@DashCoreAutoGuix
Copy link

Guix Automation has completed; a release should be present here: https://github.com/dashpay/dash-dev-branches/releases/tag/v23.0.0-devpr7014.01336d8b. The image should be on dockerhub soon.

Copy link
Member

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 01336d8

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit a11e73e into dashpay:develop Nov 28, 2025
30 of 32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants