-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
ci: don't use pull_request in guix-build.yml #7014
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe GitHub Actions workflow configuration in Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
Tip 📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.
Example instruction:
Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
✅ No Merge Conflicts DetectedThis PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs. |
|
Guix Automation has began to build this PR tagged as v23.0.0-devpr7014.01336d8b. A new comment will be made when the image is pushed. |
|
Guix Automation has completed; a release should be present here: https://github.com/dashpay/dash-dev-branches/releases/tag/v23.0.0-devpr7014.01336d8b. The image should be on dockerhub soon. |
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 01336d8
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
pull_requestdoesn't have enough permissions. Only works for a branch in the same repo e.g. https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/19731863320.#6951 follow-up
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
For a branch from a forked repo UdjinM6#24:
develop: https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/19732188359?pr=24
this PR (develop in my repo updated with this patch): https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/19732354343?pr=24
Breaking Changes
n/a
Checklist: