Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix struct field name and some typos in comment #23126

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

oftenoccur
Copy link
Contributor

@oftenoccur oftenoccur commented Dec 30, 2024

Description

fix struct field name and some typos in comment


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

Please see Pull Request Reviewer section in the contributing guide for more information on how to review a pull request.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Comprehensive update to RFC-003 detailing cross-language execution model for Cosmos SDK
    • Added new sections defining accounts, modules, message handling, and hypervisor interactions
    • Introduced concept of volatility for message handlers
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected typos in various comments across different files
    • Fixed error message clarity in state simulation module
  • Chores

    • Improved documentation precision in authentication and transaction decoding modules

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 30, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request encompasses multiple changes across different files in the Cosmos SDK repository. The most significant update is in the docs/rfc/rfc-003-crosslang.md document, which provides a comprehensive revision of the cross-language and cross-VM execution model. The RFC now includes detailed definitions for accounts, modules, messages, and their interactions. Other changes involve minor corrections in comments and error messages across various files like simapp/v2/export.go, x/auth/ante/unordered.go, and x/tx/decode/unknown.go.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/rfc/rfc-003-crosslang.md Major RFC update with new sections on cross-language execution model, account lifecycle, and module interactions
schema/testing/statesim/module_diff.go Corrected error message typo from "actuall" to "actual"
simapp/v2/export.go Fixed typo in comment from "demonstation" to "demonstration"
x/auth/ante/unordered.go Updated comment for maxTimeoutDuration field
x/tx/decode/unknown.go Corrected typo in comment about protobuf registry

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Hypervisor
    participant VM1
    participant VM2
    participant AccountHandler
    
    Hypervisor->>VM1: Create Account
    VM1->>AccountHandler: Register Account
    Hypervisor->>VM2: Create Account
    VM2->>AccountHandler: Register Account
    
    VM1->>VM2: Send Cross-VM Message
    Hypervisor->>AccountHandler: Validate Message
    AccountHandler-->>Hypervisor: Message Validation Result
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

C:collections, C:Simulations, C:server/v2

Suggested reviewers

  • kocubinski
  • testinginprod
  • akhilkumarpilli
  • julienrbrt
  • sontrinh16

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Signed-off-by: oftenoccur <ezc5@sina.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
docs/rfc/rfc-003-crosslang.md (2)

Line range hint 1-400: Consider enhancing documentation with examples

The RFC provides a comprehensive theoretical framework, but could benefit from:

  1. Code examples demonstrating the implementation of account handlers in different languages
  2. Sequence diagrams illustrating message flow between accounts and modules
  3. Concrete examples of volatility rules in action

These additions would help developers better understand the practical implications of the design.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~167-~167: For conciseness, try rephrasing this sentence.
Context: ...rdinate around the usage of this token. It is possible that state modules expose methods for creating new **state tokens...

(MAY_MIGHT_BE)


Line range hint 1-400: Specify timelines for future specifications

The document mentions several aspects that will be specified in future updates or separate RFCs:

  • Message packet layout details
  • Message encoding and naming standards
  • Storage specifications
  • Event handling
  • Authorization middleware details

Consider adding tentative timelines or tracking issues for these specifications to help manage expectations and dependencies.

🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[style] ~167-~167: For conciseness, try rephrasing this sentence.
Context: ...rdinate around the usage of this token. It is possible that state modules expose methods for creating new **state tokens...

(MAY_MIGHT_BE)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f3f401 and b5525fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • docs/rfc/rfc-003-crosslang.md (1 hunks)
  • schema/testing/statesim/module_diff.go (1 hunks)
  • simapp/v2/export.go (1 hunks)
  • x/auth/ante/unordered.go (1 hunks)
  • x/tx/decode/unknown.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • schema/testing/statesim/module_diff.go
  • x/tx/decode/unknown.go
  • simapp/v2/export.go
  • x/auth/ante/unordered.go
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
docs/rfc/rfc-003-crosslang.md (1)

Pattern **/*.md: "Assess the documentation for misspellings, grammatical errors, missing documentation and correctness"

🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs/rfc/rfc-003-crosslang.md (1)

165-165: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix typo in volatility description

There's a typo in the word "readonly":

-* `volatile`: the handler can have side effects and send `volatile`, `radonly` or `pure` messages to other accounts. Such handlers are expected to both read and write state.
+* `volatile`: the handler can have side effects and send `volatile`, `readonly` or `pure` messages to other accounts. Such handlers are expected to both read and write state.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle enabled auto-merge January 2, 2025 15:34
@bearycool11

This comment was marked as spam.

@bearycool11

This comment was marked as spam.

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ These bytes can be used by the **state handler** to determine what type of state

A **state token** is an opaque array of 32-bytes that is passed in each message request.
The hypervisor has no knowledge of what this token represents or how it is created,
but it is expected that modules that mange state do understand this token and use it to manage all state changes
but it is expected that modules that manage state do understand this token and use it to manage all state changes

This comment was marked as spam.

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ func DiffModuleStates(expected, actual view.ModuleState) string {
continue
}
if actualColl == nil {
res += fmt.Sprintf("Object Collection %s: actuall collection NOT FOUND\n", objTypeName)
res += fmt.Sprintf("Object Collection %s: actual collection NOT FOUND\n", objTypeName)

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

This comment was marked as spam.

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ var _ sdk.AnteDecorator = (*UnorderedTxDecorator)(nil)
// The UnorderedTxDecorator should be placed as early as possible in the AnteHandler
// chain to ensure that during DeliverTx, the transaction is added to the UnorderedTxManager.
type UnorderedTxDecorator struct {
// maxUnOrderedTTL defines the maximum TTL a transaction can define.
// maxTimeoutDuration defines the maximum TTL a transaction can define.

This comment was marked as spam.

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ func doRejectUnknownFields(
}
// if a message descriptor is a placeholder resolve it using the injected resolver.
// this can happen when a descriptor has been registered in the
// "google.golang.org/protobuf" resgistry but not in "github.com/cosmos/gogoproto".
// "google.golang.org/protobuf" registry but not in "github.com/cosmos/gogoproto".

This comment was marked as spam.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into cosmos:main with commit f29d7f7 Jan 3, 2025
68 of 71 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants