Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[testing-devel] overrides: fast-track podman-2.0.6-1.fc32, ostree-2020.6-2.fc32 #596

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 3, 2020

Conversation

dustymabe
Copy link
Member

@dustymabe dustymabe commented Sep 3, 2020

This fast-tracks the new podman and ostree releases.

commit 19fad0b2c9690c7443671c6286031c2c22ec2fe9
Author: Dusty Mabe <dusty@dustymabe.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 3 16:19:34 2020 -0400

    overrides: fast-track ostree-2020.6-2.fc32
    
    https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-eb29bce63d
    
    This includes a fix for:
    https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/617

commit 77744d50f2e2811c136a385a3e419fe329f380ca
Author: Dusty Mabe <dusty@dustymabe.com>
Date:   Thu Sep 3 16:03:59 2020 -0400

    overrides: fast-track podman-2.0.6-1.fc32
    
    https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0c1986cdf7
    
    See also:
    https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/575

@dustymabe
Copy link
Member Author

podman 2.0.6 is currently rolled out to next and seems to be going fine. Let's get it into testing-devel. If an issue crops up we can revert before next week's testing release.

@dustymabe dustymabe changed the title [testing-devel] overrides: fast-track podman-2.0.6-1.fc32 [testing-devel] overrides: fast-track podman-2.0.6-1.fc32, ostree-2020.6-2.fc32 Sep 3, 2020
@dustymabe dustymabe merged commit fab619b into coreos:testing-devel Sep 3, 2020
@dustymabe dustymabe deleted the dusty-promote-podman branch September 3, 2020 20:49
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Hmm this doesn't seem to be working locally for me, I'm still getting

  ostree-2020.4-2.fc32.x86_64 (fedora-coreos-pool)
  ostree-libs-2020.4-2.fc32.x86_64 (fedora-coreos-pool)

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

Do we have to wait for the pool to regenerate or something?

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

cgwalters commented Sep 3, 2020

Nevermind, some sort of local rpm-md caching issue it seems; a cosa clean fixed it. But there also is seemingly a bug here in that even with --strict we're letting the depsolver find the old version. Might be something else to use coreos/rpm-ostree#2125 for the lockfiles too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants