Skip to content

Conversation

@mernst
Copy link
Member

@mernst mernst commented Jan 16, 2026

No description provided.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 16, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

This pull request adds a new Makefile target java/ChicoryPremain.jar that delegates to the java subdirectory to build the ChicoryPremain.jar artifact. Additionally, it introduces a TODO comment in the java Makefile regarding Java target configuration, adds a "Note: " prefix to a logging message in BuildJDK.java during class instrumentation progress reporting, and suppresses removal-related warnings in a test framework class with an annotation.

Possibly related PRs

  • Treat recursive make correctly #755: Modifies Makefile rules that invoke sub-make in the java subdirectory to use ${MAKE} variable instead of hardcoded make invocations.
  • Update Makefile #736: Directly related as it modifies Makefile targets to add and build ChicoryPremain.jar as a public target.

Suggested reviewers

  • markro49
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@Makefile`:
- Around line 727-729: The make target "java/ChicoryPremain.jar" is currently a
no-op once the jar exists; change it to always delegate by adding a dummy force
prerequisite and marking that prerequisite phony (e.g. add a "FORCE" empty
target and add "java/ChicoryPremain.jar: FORCE" and ".PHONY: FORCE"), so the
recipe "${MAKE} -C java ChicoryPremain.jar" runs every time and avoids stale
builds.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 114d503 and 8fb971e.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • Makefile
  • java/Makefile
  • java/daikon/dcomp/BuildJDK.java
  • tests/sources/junit/framework/TestResult.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (11)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_part1_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_part2_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_part3_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_part3_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_latest_part2_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (quick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (typecheck_bundled_part1_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (kvasir_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (misc_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nonquick_ubuntu_jdk25)
  • GitHub Check: codespecs.daikon (nontxt_ubuntu_jdk25)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
java/daikon/dcomp/BuildJDK.java (1)

503-508: Log prefix change is fine.
No functional impact; message clarity is improved.

java/Makefile (1)

66-66: Comment-only note looks good.
No build behavior changes introduced.

tests/sources/junit/framework/TestResult.java (1)

122-123: Scoped suppression is appropriate.
Limited to the method; no behavior change.

✏️ Tip: You can disable this entire section by setting review_details to false in your review settings.

@mernst mernst merged commit dea10cb into codespecs:master Jan 21, 2026
49 checks passed
@mernst mernst deleted the building branch January 21, 2026 00:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant