Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

roachprod: default to buffering file sinks in roachprod #133256

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

jbowens
Copy link
Collaborator

@jbowens jbowens commented Oct 23, 2024

In roachprod clusters, default to using buffering in file sinks. This is required by a subsequent change that will default to using WAL failover in roachprod clusters.

Informs #133248
Informs #129922
Epic: CRDB-37534
Release note: none

In roachprod clusters, default to using buffering in file sinks. This is
required by a subsequent change that will default to using WAL failover in
roachprod clusters.

Informs cockroachdb#133248
Informs cockroachdb#129922
Epic: CRDB-37534
Release note: none
@jbowens jbowens requested review from dhartunian, a team and itsbilal October 23, 2024 15:16
@jbowens jbowens requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2024 15:16
@jbowens jbowens requested review from herkolategan and nameisbhaskar and removed request for a team October 23, 2024 15:16
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@itsbilal itsbilal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@jbowens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jbowens commented Oct 23, 2024

TFTRs!

bors r+

@craig craig bot merged commit 1c9e30f into cockroachdb:master Oct 23, 2024
23 checks passed
@jbowens jbowens deleted the default-buffering branch October 23, 2024 19:51
@jbowens jbowens restored the default-buffering branch October 23, 2024 19:51
@jbowens
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jbowens commented Oct 23, 2024

blathers backport 24.3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants