Skip to content

Conversation

@gefjon
Copy link
Contributor

@gefjon gefjon commented Apr 3, 2025

Description of Changes

Like the title says. I noticed we had some broken links in doc comments while working on #2547 , and thought it would be wise to detect them in CI.

API and ABI breaking changes

N/a.

Expected complexity level and risk

Testing

@gefjon gefjon requested a review from bfops April 3, 2025 14:58
@gefjon gefjon self-assigned this Apr 3, 2025
This requires hiding `Filter` behind the feature flag,
in addition to the `client_visibility_filter` macro,
since the doc comment for `Filter` links to the macro.
`Filter` is not useful outside of its connection with the macro,
so feature-gating it seems fine.
Copy link
Collaborator

@bfops bfops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The CI part LGTM. If the other changes make it pass, I assume they're correct too 👍

@gefjon gefjon requested a review from joshua-spacetime April 3, 2025 17:12
@gefjon
Copy link
Contributor Author

gefjon commented Apr 3, 2025

From a commit message:

This requires hiding Filter behind the feature flag,
in addition to the client_visibility_filter macro,
since the doc comment for Filter links to the macro.
Filter is not useful outside of its connection with the macro,
so feature-gating it seems fine.

@gefjon gefjon enabled auto-merge April 3, 2025 17:27
@gefjon gefjon added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 80b3613 Apr 3, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants