Remove PutPartial from DMIToTL #2598
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related issue:
Type of change: other enhancement
Impact: no functional change
Development Phase: implementation
Release Notes
A request was made to simplify the DMIToTL module so that it uses only PutFull TL transactions and not PutPartial. PutPartial had been used to handle DMI_NOP requests from the Debug Transport Module. These generated a TL PutPartial to the DMCONTROL register with mask=0, so had no effect on the state of DMCONTROL. This PR changes handling of DMI_NOP to do a PutFull to HARTINFO, which is a read-only register so still will have no effect on register state.
HARTINFO was moved from DMInner to DMOuter to facilitate this. HARTINFO has only read-only fields that are populated by implementation parameters so can be in either domain.