This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 20, 2024. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
[smem] fix read-under-write serialization #2595
[smem] fix read-under-write serialization #2595
Changes from 1 commit
79f7119
7da1522
459e581
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nit: using non-assert matchers may be more readable:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I disagree. I like to keep things simple and scalatest will still highlight the failure correctly when using plain asserts. The
should
ormust
matchers have some weird corner cases (I forgot what they were, but there was some trouble in the past that would have been avoided by sticking to the basics).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me know if you insist on using the
should
and I will change it in order to get this change in.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's no problem with using them here and continuing to use them aligns with all the other tests in this file.
For corner cases, you may be thinking of string matching on
include
vscontains
? The former looks for a substring match and the latter looks for an exact match.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't care. It's good to land as-is. 👍