Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: dynamic sidebar content #48

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

misohu
Copy link
Member

@misohu misohu commented Aug 15, 2022

Related to this jira task and this feature

In kubeflow-dashboard-operator there is a sidebar relation. In order to add element to the sidebar proper relation needs to be established. After the relation is set, charms fills the config for given app-name.

Sidebar element is removed after the relation is broken.

@misohu misohu requested a review from a team as a code owner August 15, 2022 12:58
@misohu misohu changed the title Hucko dynamic sidebar content feat: dynamic sidebar content Aug 15, 2022
DnPlas
DnPlas previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2022
@misohu misohu requested a review from a team August 31, 2022 14:08
agathanatasha
agathanatasha previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 7, 2022

Libraries are not up to date with their remote counterparts. If this was
not intentional, run charmcraft fetch-libs and commit the updated libs
to your PR branch.

stdout
Library charms.kubeflow_dashboard.v0.kubeflow_dashboard_sidebar not found in Charmhub.

stderr

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

DnPlas commented Jun 29, 2023

There is a current effort for designing and implementing the dynamic sidebar feature, which will introduce some changes that will likely be incompatible with this PR.
Closing this PR because of that, but feel free to re-open if needed. Thanks @misohu !

@DnPlas DnPlas closed this Jun 29, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants