Updating Roadmap #186
Updating Roadmap #186
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@leogdion has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 7 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughREADME reorganized: top-level Overview replaced by a Table of Contents; sections restructured into Getting Started, Usage (with Authentication subsections), Documentation, Roadmap, and Support; installation snippets, platform requirements, error handling, examples, and roadmap/versioning were rewritten and reformatted. No code or public API changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
364-364: Consider clarifying or renaming the "alpha.X" version placeholder.Using "alpha.X" as a catch-all version (line 364) is unconventional. If this is a placeholder for future alpha releases, consider either:
- Naming it explicitly (e.g.,
### Future Alphas (alpha.3+)) to signal intent- Documenting this convention in a project maintainability guide
This would improve clarity for contributors and users following the roadmap.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (7)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Map CloudKit types (Asset, Reference, Location) to appropriate Swift types
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use Property wrappers for CloudKit field mapping
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use swift-log for cross-platform logging support with MistKitLogger subsystems (api, auth, network)
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Include request/response details in error types for debugging
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Implement AsyncSequence for paginated results (queries, list operations)
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : All models should be Codable with custom CodingKeys when needed
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : All network operations should use async/await, not completion handlers
Applied to files:
README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (16)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
- GitHub Check: Analyze (swift)
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (tvos, macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_26.0.app, Apple TV, 26.0)
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (ios, macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_16.4.app, iPhone 16e, 18.5)
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_16.4.app)
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_26.0.app)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.2)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.2, true)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.2, true)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.1)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.1)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2025, swift-6.1-release, 6.1-RELEASE)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.2)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2022, swift-6.2-release, 6.2-RELEASE)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2025, swift-6.2-release, 6.2-RELEASE)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2022, swift-6.1-release, 6.1-RELEASE)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
354-354: Clarify duplicate issue reference #116 across versions.Issue #116 is referenced in both v1.0.0-alpha.2 (line 354, completed) and v1.0.0 (line 387, pending). Verify this is intentional—if they represent the same feature, consolidate the roadmap entries; if unrelated, update one reference to the correct issue number.
Also applies to: 387-387
335-398: Roadmap restructuring looks good.The migration from v0.2.4 to versioned alpha releases is well-organized, with clear progression from completed alpha work (alpha.1, alpha.2) to upcoming features (alpha.3, alpha.X, v1.0.0, v1.1.0). All items are linked to GitHub issues, providing excellent traceability. The installation instructions (line 41) correctly reference the new versioning scheme.
Pull Request Review: Roadmap ReorganizationThis PR reorganizes the roadmap by splitting completed and planned features into more granular alpha versions, providing better milestone tracking toward v1.0.0. Positive Aspects1. Improved Organization
2. Better Project Planning
3. Enhanced Readability
Observations and Suggestions1. Issue Reference Verification
2. Version Naming Clarity
3. Missing Considerations
4. Documentation Consistency
RecommendationApprove with minor suggestions This PR significantly improves the roadmap organization and makes project planning more transparent. Main suggestions:
The changes are documentation-only with no code impact, making this a safe merge. Overall: Excellent work organizing the project roadmap! This will help contributors understand project direction and current status. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #186 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 14.27% 14.33% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 67 67
Lines 7179 7179
==========================================
+ Hits 1025 1029 +4
+ Misses 6154 6150 -4
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
57-109: Restructure fragmented Getting Started section with proper markdown formatting.The README has critically malformed content between lines 57–109. According to the TOC (lines 18–35), "Getting Started" should contain Installation → Requirements → Quick Start, but the sections are severely scattered with broken markdown:
- Line 57–61: Orphaned Xcode installation text appears between Acknowledgments and a stray "### Key Features" header
- Line 63: First "### Quick Start" begins
- Line 69–76: Authentication code block missing closing backticks
- Line 78: "### Installation" header appears mid-Quick Start content
- Line 80–85: Another incomplete code block without closing backticks
- Line 87: "### Requirements" header appears after incomplete code
- Line 93: Duplicate "### Quick Start" header
This breaks both document structure and markdown rendering. Consolidate all Getting Started subsections in order (Installation → Requirements → Quick Start), ensure all code blocks have proper closing backticks, and remove duplicate headers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(10 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (10)
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use Property wrappers for CloudKit field mapping
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Include request/response details in error types for debugging
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.swift : Use typed errors conforming to LocalizedError for error handling
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use swift-log for cross-platform logging support with MistKitLogger subsystems (api, auth, network)
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : All network operations should use async/await, not completion handlers
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use SecureLogging utilities for token masking and safe message formatting
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use Result builders for query construction
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : All models should be Codable with custom CodingKeys when needed
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Map CloudKit types (Asset, Reference, Location) to appropriate Swift types
Applied to files:
README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z
Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Implement AsyncSequence for paginated results (queries, list operations)
Applied to files:
README.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
19-19: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
20-20: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
21-21: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
22-22: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
22-22: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
23-23: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
23-23: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
24-24: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
26-26: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
27-27: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
28-28: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
28-28: Link fragments should be valid
(MD051, link-fragments)
29-29: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
30-30: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 2; Actual: 4
(MD007, ul-indent)
31-31: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD005, list-indent)
31-31: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
32-32: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD005, list-indent)
32-32: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
33-33: Inconsistent indentation for list items at the same level
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD005, list-indent)
33-33: Unordered list indentation
Expected: 0; Actual: 1
(MD007, ul-indent)
187-187: Code block style
Expected: fenced; Actual: indented
(MD046, code-block-style)
192-192: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
281-281: Multiple headings with the same content
(MD024, no-duplicate-heading)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (16)
- GitHub Check: claude-review
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (ios, macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_16.4.app, iPhone 16e, 18.5)
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (watchos, macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_26.0.app, Apple Watch Ultra 3 (49mm), 26.0)
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_16.4.app)
- GitHub Check: Build on macOS (macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_26.0.app)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.2, true)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2022, swift-6.1-release, 6.1-RELEASE)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.2)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2025, swift-6.2-release, 6.2-RELEASE)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.2, true)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.2)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.1)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (swift)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2022, swift-6.2-release, 6.2-RELEASE)
- GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2025, swift-6.1-release, 6.1-RELEASE)
- GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
README.md (2)
307-372: Roadmap content is well-structured and clear.The roadmap effectively communicates the progression from alpha versions through 1.0.0 and beyond, with clear task lists and GitHub issue links. The organization by version (alpha.1, alpha.2, alpha.3, alpha.X, v1.0.0, v1.1.0) makes it easy to track progress and plan contributions.
37-45: Remove redundant "### Examples" heading at line 281.The document contains a duplicate "Examples" heading in immediate succession at lines 280–281 (two consecutive "### Examples" headings). Line 281 is a duplicate that should be removed, keeping only one "### Examples" heading with the content that follows.
Additionally, the two "Documentation" sections differ in heading level: line 45 uses
## Documentation(level 2), while line 289 uses### Documentation(level 3). Consider aligning these to a consistent heading level for the document structure.⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: CR Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0 File: CLAUDE.md:0-0 Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Map CloudKit types (Asset, Reference, Location) to appropriate Swift typesLearnt from: CR Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0 File: CLAUDE.md:0-0 Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use Property wrappers for CloudKit field mappingLearnt from: CR Repo: brightdigit/MistKit PR: 0 File: CLAUDE.md:0-0 Timestamp: 2025-11-27T12:49:50.059Z Learning: Applies to **/MistKit/**/*.swift : Use swift-log for cross-platform logging support with MistKitLogger subsystems (api, auth, network)
Pull Request Review: Roadmap UpdateOverviewThis PR updates the README.md with a restructured roadmap and improved documentation organization. The changes involve significant reorganization of content with a net reduction in lines (-11 lines overall). ✅ Strengths
|
Pull Request Review: Updating RoadmapOverall AssessmentThis is a documentation-only PR that restructures the README.md with improved organization and an updated roadmap. The changes are generally positive and enhance readability. ✅ Strengths1. Improved Structure & Navigation
2. Roadmap Enhancements
3. Content Improvements
|
Pull Request Review: Updating RoadmapThank you for this documentation update! I've reviewed the changes to the README.md file. Here's my feedback: ✅ Strengths
📝 Minor Issues & Suggestions1. Inconsistent Indentation in Table of Contents (Lines 18-35)The indentation is inconsistent. Some items use 4 spaces, others don't have proper hierarchy: - [Overview](#overview)
- [Key Features](#key-features) # 4 spaces
- [Getting Started](#getting-started)
- [Installation](#installation)
- [Documentation](#documentation) # 1 space (should be 4 or none)Recommendation: Use consistent indentation (either all 4 spaces for sub-items, or 2 spaces). 2. Removed AsyncHTTPClient Cleanup Code (Lines 243-258)The old version included: defer {
try? httpClient.syncShutdown()
}While the comment "AsyncHTTPClient instance usually supplied by the Server API" is accurate, removing the cleanup example might leave users wondering about resource management. Recommendation: Consider adding a brief note about lifecycle management: // AsyncHTTPClient instance usually supplied by the Server API
// Make sure to properly shut down the client when your application terminates
let httpClient : HTTPClient3. Missing Version Update Context (Line 58)The installation instructions changed from Recommendation: Either:
4. Documentation Link Changed (Line 284)Changed from: - **[API Documentation](https://brightdigit.github.io/MistKit)**: Complete API reference
- **[DocC Documentation](./Sources/MistKit/Documentation.docc)**: Interactive documentationTo: - **[API Documentation](https://swiftpackageindex.com/brightdigit/MistKit/~/documentation)**: Complete API referenceThis is a good change (SwiftPackageIndex is more reliable), but the removal of the DocC link means developers cloning the repo won't know there's local documentation available. Recommendation: Consider keeping both: - **[API Documentation](https://swiftpackageindex.com/brightdigit/MistKit/~/documentation)**: Complete API reference (online)
- **[Local Documentation](./Sources/MistKit/Documentation.docc)**: DocC documentation in the repository5. Roadmap: Duplicate/Missing Issue ReferencesSome roadmap items reference the same issue numbers for different features (e.g., multiple items reference #113, #114, #116). This might be intentional if they're tracking epics, but it could be clearer. Recommendation: Verify that all issue links are correct, or use more specific issue numbers for individual features. 🎯 Best Practices AlignmentAccording to CLAUDE.md:
🔒 Security ConsiderationsThe removal of the "Security Best Practices" section (including environment variables and token storage examples) is noted. While this streamlines the README, ensure this information is available elsewhere (e.g., in the detailed documentation or a SECURITY.md file). 🧪 Test CoverageN/A - This is a documentation-only change. 📊 SummaryOverall Assessment: ✅ Approve with minor suggestions This is a solid documentation improvement that makes the README more navigable and the roadmap clearer. The suggested changes are minor formatting and consistency improvements that would further enhance the user experience. Impact: Low risk - Documentation only Review generated with Claude Code |
Pull Request Review: Updating Roadmap (#186)I've reviewed this documentation update and have the following feedback: ✅ Strengths1. Improved Organization & Navigation
2. Enhanced Clarity
3. Better User Experience
4. Roadmap Improvements
📝 Minor Suggestions1. Consistency in Code Examples 2. Documentation Section 3. Roadmap Clarity ✅ Code Quality Assessment
🎯 Overall AssessmentThis is a well-executed documentation improvement that:
The changes align well with the project goals and follow documentation best practices. 🚀 RecommendationAPPROVE - This PR is ready to merge with the minor suggestions above as optional follow-up improvements. The documentation changes are solid and improve the overall user experience significantly. Review generated by Claude Code following MistKit CLAUDE.md guidelines |
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.