Skip to content

Conversation

@leogdion
Copy link
Member

@leogdion leogdion commented Sep 28, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • CloudKitService initializers now accept a custom HTTP transport (default: URLSession).
    • API-only initialization now defaults to the Public database.
  • Documentation

    • Migrated tutorials and examples from MistKitClient to CloudKitService.
    • Updated authentication guides (API Token, Web Auth, Server-to-Server) with new service-based setup.
    • Added example for using an AsyncHTTPClient-based transport.
    • Expanded platform table (including Windows) and refreshed wording/section titles.
    • Added a Roadmap section and updated badges.
    • Improved error messaging in examples and standardized containerIdentifier usage.

leogdion and others added 5 commits September 27, 2025 19:13
- Add transport parameter to all CloudKitService initializers with URLSessionTransport as default
- Update README.md to use CloudKitService as main entry point instead of MistKitClient
- Update Documentation.docc to use CloudKitService in all examples
- Align documentation with actual usage patterns shown in Examples/MistDemo
- Clean up commented code in MistKitClient

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Walkthrough

Documentation updates shift from MistKitConfiguration/MistKitClient to CloudKitService-based examples. CloudKitService initializers now accept an optional transport parameter and adjust defaults. MistKitClient removes an internal convenience initializer. Public imports for OpenAPIRuntime/OpenAPIURLSession are exposed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs overhaul to CloudKitService
README.md, Sources/MistKit/Documentation.docc/Documentation.md
Rewrote setup/usage to use CloudKitService; updated auth examples (API token, web auth, server-to-server); adjusted headings/terminology; added AsyncHTTPClient transport example; added Roadmap; updated badges and platform info.
Service initializers and transport support
Sources/MistKit/Service/CloudKitService+Initialization.swift
Added transport: any ClientTransport = URLSessionTransport() to public initializers; forwarded transport to MistKitClient; changed API-only default database to .public; made OpenAPIRuntime/OpenAPIURLSession public imports.
Client constructor removal
Sources/MistKit/MistKitClient.swift
Removed internal convenience init(configuration: MistKitConfiguration, tokenManager: any TokenManager); callers must provide explicit transport via other initializers.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  actor Dev as Developer Code
  participant Svc as CloudKitService
  participant MK as MistKitClient
  participant Tx as ClientTransport
  participant CK as CloudKit API

  Note over Dev,Svc: Initialization (new parameter)
  Dev->>Svc: init(containerIdentifier, auth..., transport?)
  Svc->>MK: init(config..., transport)
  MK->>Tx: bind transport (URLSessionTransport default or custom)
  Note right of Tx: Transport ready

  Note over Dev,CK: Request flow (unchanged high-level)
  Dev->>Svc: perform operation()
  Svc->>MK: build request
  MK->>Tx: send HTTP request
  Tx->>CK: HTTPS call
  CK-->>Tx: response
  Tx-->>MK: deliver response
  MK-->>Svc: parsed result
  Svc-->>Dev: return result
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Poem

I twitch my ears at transports new,
A service hops where clients grew.
With docs refreshed and badges bright,
I bound through APIs in the light.
One fewer path, a cleaner run—
Cloudy kits, but clearer fun. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The title uses a generic verb “Fixing” and pairs two broad topics without clarifying the specific changes being made to the README (badge and tutorial updates) or how CloudKitService availability is improved (public imports and initializer changes), making it too vague to clearly convey the main intent of this pull request. Consider renaming the pull request to something more descriptive such as “Update README badges and publicize CloudKitService initializers with transport support”, which clearly highlights the badge updates and the specific CloudKitService changes.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch readme-fixes

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 8.32%. Comparing base (d0803e9) to head (1adbfe7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...stKit/Service/CloudKitService+Initialization.swift 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##            main    #127      +/-   ##
========================================
- Coverage   8.32%   8.32%   -0.01%     
========================================
  Files         44      44              
  Lines       7426    7427       +1     
========================================
  Hits         618     618              
- Misses      6808    6809       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
spm 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.1-jammy 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.1-jammynightly 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.1-noble 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.1-noblenightly 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.2-jammy 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.2-jammynightly 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.2-noble 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
swift-6.2-noblenightly 8.32% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Pull Request Review

Overall Assessment ✅

This PR successfully modernizes the MistKit documentation and improves the CloudKitService availability annotations. The changes demonstrate good adherence to modern Swift practices and the repository's CLAUDE.md guidelines.

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

README.md Modernization

  • ✅ Excellent: Complete rewrite follows modern documentation standards
  • ✅ Strong: Clear authentication method explanations with practical examples
  • ✅ Good: Platform support matrix is comprehensive and accurate
  • ✅ Strong: Security best practices section with environment variable usage

CloudKitService+Initialization.swift

  • ✅ Excellent: Proper availability annotations (@available(macOS 11.0, iOS 14.0, tvOS 14.0, watchOS 7.0, *))
  • ✅ Strong: Clear separation of authentication methods (API-only, web auth, custom TokenManager)
  • ✅ Good: Database restrictions properly enforced (API-only → public database)
  • ✅ Strong: Consistent error handling patterns

MistKitClient.swift

  • ✅ Excellent: Server-to-server validation logic in validateServerToServerConfiguration
  • ✅ Strong: Proper type extraction from different TokenManager types
  • ✅ Good: Multiple initialization patterns with appropriate defaults

Security Analysis ✅

Positive Security Practices

  • ✅ Excellent: Environment variables recommended for sensitive credentials
  • ✅ Strong: Server-to-server auth restricted to public database only
  • ✅ Good: Token masking mentioned in documentation
  • ✅ Strong: Clear separation between authentication methods

No Security Concerns Found

  • No hardcoded credentials detected
  • No credential logging or exposure issues
  • Proper validation of authentication constraints

Performance Considerations ✅

  • ✅ Good: Lazy initialization patterns in MistKitClient
  • ✅ Acceptable: URLSessionTransport as default is appropriate
  • ✅ Good: Middleware pattern allows for performance monitoring

Documentation Quality ✅

README.md Strengths

  • ✅ Excellent: Clear quick start guide with multiple authentication examples
  • ✅ Strong: Comprehensive platform support documentation
  • ✅ Good: Well-structured roadmap with GitHub issue links
  • ✅ Strong: Modern badges and visual elements

DocC Documentation

  • ✅ Good: Consistent with README content
  • ✅ Strong: Proper symbol linking and topic organization

Test Coverage Assessment ⚠️

Existing Test Strengths

  • ✅ Excellent: Comprehensive authentication test suite (60+ test files)
  • ✅ Strong: Good coverage of TokenManager implementations
  • ✅ Good: Error handling and edge case testing

Missing Test Coverage

  • ⚠️ Missing: No specific tests for CloudKitService initialization methods
  • ⚠️ Recommend: Add integration tests for the new availability-annotated initializers
  • ⚠️ Suggest: Test server-to-server database restriction validation

Recommendations

High Priority

  1. Add CloudKitService Tests: Create tests specifically for the initialization methods in CloudKitService+Initialization.swift
  2. Test Availability Annotations: Ensure the availability requirements work correctly across platforms

Medium Priority

  1. Integration Testing: Add tests that verify the complete initialization flow from configuration to client
  2. Error Path Testing: Test the server-to-server database restriction validation

Low Priority

  1. Documentation Examples: Consider adding more code examples in the README for complex scenarios
  2. Performance Benchmarks: Add basic performance tests for initialization paths

Compliance with CLAUDE.md ✅

  • ✅ Modern Swift Features: Proper use of async/await patterns and availability annotations
  • ✅ Type Safety: Strong typing throughout the authentication system
  • ✅ Error Handling: Comprehensive error types and proper propagation
  • ✅ Security: Environment variable usage and credential protection
  • ✅ Architecture: Protocol-oriented design with dependency injection

Summary

This is a high-quality PR that successfully modernizes MistKit's documentation and improves the CloudKitService API. The code follows Swift best practices, properly handles security concerns, and provides excellent documentation. The only area for improvement is adding specific tests for the new CloudKitService initialization methods.

Recommendation: ✅ Approve with minor suggestions - Consider adding the missing test coverage in a follow-up PR.

@leogdion leogdion merged commit 8bc2a3e into main Sep 28, 2025
25 of 29 checks passed
@leogdion leogdion deleted the readme-fixes branch September 28, 2025 11:36
@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Sep 28, 2025

Code Review for PR #127: Fixing README and CloudKitService availability

Thank you for this comprehensive update to the documentation and CloudKitService initialization. Here's my detailed review:

Positive Aspects

Documentation Improvements:

  • Excellent user experience focus: The README now centers on CloudKitService as the primary interface, which provides a much cleaner API
  • Comprehensive badges and branding: Professional presentation with Swift Package Index integration and quality metrics
  • Clear authentication examples: The three authentication patterns (API token, web auth, server-to-server) are well-documented with practical code examples
  • Updated roadmap: Great transparency about current features and future plans

Code Quality:

  • Proper availability annotations: Consistent @available(macOS 11.0, iOS 14.0, tvOS 14.0, watchOS 7.0, *) usage
  • Clean API design: The new CloudKitService initializers provide a more intuitive interface than the previous configuration-based approach
  • Default parameter handling: Good use of defaults like URLSessionTransport() and appropriate database defaults

🔍 Areas for Improvement

Security Considerations:

  1. API Token Storage (CloudKitService+Initialization.swift:93): The line self.apiToken = "" when using TokenManager could be clearer. Consider documenting this behavior or using a more explicit approach.

  2. Token Validation: The new convenience initializers don't appear to validate token format/structure. Consider adding basic validation for API tokens if not already present in the underlying layers.

Code Architecture:

  1. Redundant Configuration Creation (CloudKitService+Initialization.swift:49-56, 71-80): Both web auth and API-only initializers create MistKitConfiguration objects with similar patterns. Consider extracting a private helper method to reduce duplication.

  2. Database Default Inconsistency: The API-only initializer defaults to .public database (line 69, 74) while the TokenManager initializer defaults to .private (line 89). This could be confusing for users. Consider documenting this clearly or making the behavior more consistent.

Test Coverage:

  • Missing Tests: I couldn't find specific tests for the new CloudKitService initialization methods. This is a critical gap that should be addressed.
  • Authentication Path Testing: The new convenience initializers should have unit tests covering all authentication patterns, error cases, and default behaviors.

Documentation:

  1. Logo SVG Optimization: The logo SVG files are quite large (126+ lines). Consider optimizing them for web use.
  2. Error Handling Examples: While error handling is mentioned, more specific examples of common error cases would be helpful.

📋 Recommendations

High Priority:

  1. Add comprehensive unit tests for the new CloudKitService initializers
  2. Add parameter validation for authentication tokens
  3. Document the database default behavior more clearly

Medium Priority:

  1. Refactor duplicate configuration creation logic
  2. Optimize SVG assets
  3. Add integration tests for the complete authentication flows

Low Priority:

  1. Consider adding more detailed error handling examples in documentation
  2. Add JSDoc-style comments to the public initializers

🚀 Overall Assessment

This PR significantly improves the developer experience and documentation quality. The move to CloudKitService as the primary interface is excellent, and the documentation updates are comprehensive and professional.

Primary concerns: Missing test coverage and some architectural consistency issues.
Recommendation: Approve after addressing test coverage and documenting database default behavior.

Great work on making MistKit more accessible and user-friendly! 👏

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b92455 and 1adbfe7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: brightdigit/MistKit#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T17:00:18.489Z
Learning: Implementation should align with the OpenAPI-defined operations and models for CloudKit Web Services
📚 Learning: 2025-09-27T17:00:18.489Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: brightdigit/MistKit#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T17:00:18.489Z
Learning: Applies to {Sources,Tests}/**/*.swift : Use async/await for all network operations; avoid completion handlers

Applied to files:

  • README.md
📚 Learning: 2025-09-27T17:00:18.489Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: brightdigit/MistKit#0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-27T17:00:18.489Z
Learning: Implementation should align with the OpenAPI-defined operations and models for CloudKit Web Services

Applied to files:

  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (18)
  • GitHub Check: claude-review
  • GitHub Check: Build on macOS (visionos, macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_26.0.app, Apple Vision Pro, 26.0)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (swift)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.2, true)
  • GitHub Check: Build on macOS (ios, macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_16.3.app, iPhone 16, 18.4)
  • GitHub Check: Build on macOS (macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_26.0.app)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.1, true)
  • GitHub Check: Build on macOS (tvos, macos-15, /Applications/Xcode_26.0.app, Apple TV, 26.0)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.2)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.2, true)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (jammy, 6.1)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.1)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.2)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Ubuntu (noble, 6.1, true)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2025, swift-6.2-release, 6.2-RELEASE)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2022, swift-6.1-release, 6.1-RELEASE)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2025, swift-6.1-release, 6.1-RELEASE)
  • GitHub Check: Build on Windows (windows-2022, swift-6.2-release, 6.2-RELEASE)

Comment on lines +260 to +262
import MistKit
import OpenAPIAsyncHTTPClient

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

Add missing AsyncHTTPClient import.

Line 260 references HTTPClient, but the snippet only imports MistKit and OpenAPIAsyncHTTPClient. Without import AsyncHTTPClient, this example won’t compile. Please add the missing import.

+import AsyncHTTPClient
 import MistKit
 import OpenAPIAsyncHTTPClient
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
import MistKit
import OpenAPIAsyncHTTPClient
import AsyncHTTPClient
import MistKit
import OpenAPIAsyncHTTPClient
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 260 to 262 the Swift example uses HTTPClient but the
snippet only imports MistKit and OpenAPIAsyncHTTPClient; add the missing import
for AsyncHTTPClient to the snippet (e.g., import AsyncHTTPClient) so the
HTTPClient symbol resolves and the example compiles, keeping imports at the top
with the other two.

Comment on lines +264 to +279
let httpClient = HTTPClient(eventLoopGroupProvider: .createNew)

// Create the transport
let transport = AsyncHTTPClientTransport(client: httpClient)

// Use with CloudKit service
let service = try CloudKitService(
containerIdentifier: "iCloud.com.example.MyApp",
apiToken: apiToken,
transport: transport
)

// Don't forget to shutdown the client when done
defer {
try? httpClient.syncShutdown()
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Place the shutdown defer immediately after creating HTTPClient.

Line 270 throws, so if CloudKitService initialization fails before the defer at Line 277 runs, the HTTP client leaks. Move the shutdown defer directly after instantiating HTTPClient so it always executes.

 let httpClient = HTTPClient(eventLoopGroupProvider: .createNew)

+defer {
+    try? httpClient.syncShutdown()
+}
+
 // Create the transport
 let transport = AsyncHTTPClientTransport(client: httpClient)
@@
-// Don't forget to shutdown the client when done
-defer {
-    try? httpClient.syncShutdown()
-}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
let httpClient = HTTPClient(eventLoopGroupProvider: .createNew)
// Create the transport
let transport = AsyncHTTPClientTransport(client: httpClient)
// Use with CloudKit service
let service = try CloudKitService(
containerIdentifier: "iCloud.com.example.MyApp",
apiToken: apiToken,
transport: transport
)
// Don't forget to shutdown the client when done
defer {
try? httpClient.syncShutdown()
}
let httpClient = HTTPClient(eventLoopGroupProvider: .createNew)
defer {
try? httpClient.syncShutdown()
}
// Create the transport
let transport = AsyncHTTPClientTransport(client: httpClient)
// Use with CloudKit service
let service = try CloudKitService(
containerIdentifier: "iCloud.com.example.MyApp",
apiToken: apiToken,
transport: transport
)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 264 to 279, the HTTPClient is created on line 270 but
its shutdown defer is placed after CloudKitService initialization, so if that
initializer throws the HTTP client will leak; move the defer { try?
httpClient.syncShutdown() } immediately after let httpClient = HTTPClient(...)
so the client is always shut down even if subsequent initialization fails.

Comment on lines +351 to +374
- [x] [List Field Types](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/110)
- [x] [Reference Field Types](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/110)
- [x] [Error Codes](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/115)
- [x] [Fetching Zones (zones/list)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)

### v1.0.0

- [ ] [System Field Integration](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Name Component Types](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Discovering User Identities (POST users/discover)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Discovering All User Identities (GET users/discover)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Support `postMessage` for Authentication Requests](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Uploading Assets (assets/upload)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Referencing Existing Assets (assets/rereference)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Records Using a Query (records/query) w/ basic filtering](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/114)
- [ ] [Handle Data Size Limits](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/115)
- [ ] [Fetching Contacts (users/lookup/contacts)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Users by Email (users/lookup/email)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Users by Record Name (users/lookup/id)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Record Changes (records/changes)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Record Information (records/resolve)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Accepting Share Records (records/accept)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Zones (zones/list)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Zones by Identifier (zones/lookup)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Resolve duplicate roadmap status for zones/list.

“Fetching Zones (zones/list)” appears as completed on Line 354 and still open on Line 373, which gives conflicting guidance. Please consolidate the entry so its status is clear.

-- [ ] [Fetching Zones (zones/list)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116) ❌
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
- [x] [List Field Types](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/110)
- [x] [Reference Field Types](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/110)
- [x] [Error Codes](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/115)
- [x] [Fetching Zones (zones/list)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
### v1.0.0
- [ ] [System Field Integration](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Name Component Types](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Discovering User Identities (POST users/discover)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Discovering All User Identities (GET users/discover)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Support `postMessage` for Authentication Requests](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Uploading Assets (assets/upload)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Referencing Existing Assets (assets/rereference)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Records Using a Query (records/query) w/ basic filtering](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/114)
- [ ] [Handle Data Size Limits](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/115)
- [ ] [Fetching Contacts (users/lookup/contacts)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Users by Email (users/lookup/email)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Users by Record Name (users/lookup/id)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Record Changes (records/changes)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Record Information (records/resolve)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Accepting Share Records (records/accept)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Zones (zones/list)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Zones by Identifier (zones/lookup)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
### v1.0.0
- [ ] [System Field Integration](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Name Component Types](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Discovering User Identities (POST users/discover)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Discovering All User Identities (GET users/discover)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Support `postMessage` for Authentication Requests](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Uploading Assets (assets/upload)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Referencing Existing Assets (assets/rereference)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Records Using a Query (records/query) w/ basic filtering](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/114)
- [ ] [Handle Data Size Limits](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/115)
- [ ] [Fetching Contacts (users/lookup/contacts)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Users by Email (users/lookup/email)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Users by Record Name (users/lookup/id)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/113)
- [ ] [Fetching Record Changes (records/changes)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Record Information (records/resolve)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Accepting Share Records (records/accept)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
- [ ] [Fetching Zones by Identifier (zones/lookup)](https://github.com/brightdigit/MistKit/issues/116)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 351 to 374 there is a duplicate roadmap entry for
"Fetching Zones (zones/list)" listed as completed at line ~354 and still open at
line ~373; remove the duplicate or make both entries consistent—preferably keep
the checked/completed version and delete the open one (or change the open one to
checked) so the roadmap shows a single, unambiguous status for zones/list.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants