This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 2, 2020. It is now read-only.
Fetch from remote after changing origin #16
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If the revision we want is only available from the new remote, we need to fetch it after the origin has been updated. Otherwise we'll try to check out a revision that git doesn't know about, which will fail.
rafaelfranca
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2015
Fetch from remote after changing origin
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for merging, @rafaelfranca. Could you release a new version with this change? I'd like to update https://github.com/boxen/our-boxen so that other people don't run into this problem. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If the revision we want is only available from the new remote, we need to fetch it after the origin has been updated. Otherwise we'll try to check out a revision that git doesn't know about, which will fail.
@rafaelfranca, would you mind reviewing this? Related to #14 and c34ece6.