Skip to content

Don't use deprecated form of user-defined literal operator #663

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

Thomas-Barbier-1A
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Thomas-Barbier-1A Thomas-Barbier-1A force-pushed the fix_deprecated_form_of_user_defined_literal_operator branch from ced03ef to ade2b95 Compare March 17, 2025 16:41
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.1%. Comparing base (49ef290) to head (ade2b95).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #663     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage     94.1%   94.1%   -0.0%     
=========================================
  Files          279     279             
  Lines        28979   28979             
=========================================
- Hits         27255   27253      -2     
- Misses        1724    1726      +2     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
include/boost/multiprecision/cpp_int/literals.hpp 100.0% <ø> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 49ef290...ade2b95. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ckormanyos
Copy link
Member

Thanks @Thomas-Barbier-1A for catching this and @mborland for the quick fix for the next release!

@mborland mborland merged commit c42d8a9 into boostorg:develop Mar 17, 2025
78 of 79 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants