Skip to content

Conversation

@nakul1010
Copy link
Contributor

@nakul1010 nakul1010 commented Sep 2, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Standardized parameter names for off-ramp order creation: orderCreationDeadline → creationDeadline, orderOwner → owner. No behavioral changes to deadlines or other arguments. This is a breaking change; update integrations accordingly.
  • Tests

    • Updated test expectations to use the new parameter names.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 2, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
bob-docs Ready Ready Preview Comment Sep 2, 2025 11:15am

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @nakul1010, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the naming conventions for parameters related to offramp order creation within the gateway client and its associated type definitions. The changes aim to improve code clarity and maintainability by adopting more concise and consistent terminology for these properties.

Highlights

  • Type Renaming: Renamed the orderCreationDeadline property to creationDeadline and orderOwner to owner within the OfframpCreateOrderParams type definition and its corresponding usage in the GatewayApiClient.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request renames two properties, orderCreationDeadline to creationDeadline and orderOwner to owner, across the codebase to fix type definitions. The changes in sdk/src/gateway/client.ts and sdk/src/gateway/types.ts are correct and consistent. However, the test file sdk/test/gateway.test.ts has not been fully updated to reflect these changes, which could lead to test failures. I've provided a suggestion to fix the test.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

Field names in OfframpCreateOrderParams.offrampArgs were renamed: orderCreationDeadline → creationDeadline and orderOwner → owner. The SDK client’s createOfframpOrder call and corresponding tests were updated to use the new names. No other logic or structure changes were introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Gateway types update
sdk/src/gateway/types.ts
Renamed fields in OfframpCreateOrderParams.offrampArgs: orderCreationDeadlinecreationDeadline (bigint), orderOwnerowner (Address).
Client parameter rename
sdk/src/gateway/client.ts
Updated createOfframpOrder to pass creationDeadline and owner in offrampArgs instead of orderCreationDeadline and orderOwner.
Test alignment
sdk/test/gateway.test.ts
Adjusted expected offrampArgs keys to creationDeadline and owner; other expectations unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • slavastartsev
  • gregdhill
  • danielsimao

Poem

A nibble of names, hop-hop they change,
From owner to owner’s shorter range.
Deadlines trimmed to tidy grace,
Args now fit their rightful place.
I stamp this merge with lucky feet—
Carrots all round for types made neat! 🥕🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/npm-types

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore or @coderabbit ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@nakul1010 nakul1010 merged commit 96af7b1 into master Sep 2, 2025
7 of 8 checks passed
@nakul1010 nakul1010 deleted the fix/npm-types branch September 2, 2025 11:17
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
sdk/src/gateway/types.ts (1)

435-436: Clarify units in JSDoc for creationDeadline.

Add “(unix seconds)” to match OfframpQuote.deadline docs and avoid ms/sec confusion.

-            /** @dev Timestamp by which the order must be created */
+            /** @dev Timestamp by which the order must be created (unix seconds) */
             creationDeadline: bigint;
sdk/test/gateway.test.ts (1)

470-477: Avoid reflexive equality on dynamic creationDeadline.

Assert type/value shape and separately check the dynamic field.

-        expect(result.offrampArgs[0]).to.deep.equal({
-            satAmountToLock: BigInt('10'),
-            satFeesMax: BigInt('100'),
-            creationDeadline: result.offrampArgs[0].creationDeadline, // timestamp is dynamic
-            outputScript: '0x1600149d5e60f3b5cc2d246f990692ee4b267d1cd58477',
-            token: '0xda472456b1a6a2fc9ae7edb0e007064224d4284c',
-            owner: '0xFAEe001465dE6D7E8414aCDD9eF4aC5A35B2B808',
-        });
+        expect(result.offrampArgs[0]).to.include({
+            satAmountToLock: BigInt('10'),
+            satFeesMax: BigInt('100'),
+            outputScript: '0x1600149d5e60f3b5cc2d246f990692ee4b267d1cd58477',
+            token: '0xda472456b1a6a2fc9ae7edb0e007064224d4284c',
+            owner: '0xFAEe001465dE6D7E8414aCDD9eF4aC5A35B2B808',
+        });
+        expect(typeof result.offrampArgs[0].creationDeadline).toBe('bigint');
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 085b0f5 and 0466ed2.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • sdk/src/gateway/client.ts (1 hunks)
  • sdk/src/gateway/types.ts (1 hunks)
  • sdk/test/gateway.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Gitleaks (8.27.2)
sdk/test/gateway.test.ts

475-475: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations.

(generic-api-key)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: test
🔇 Additional comments (4)
sdk/src/gateway/types.ts (1)

435-442: Rename to creationDeadline/owner looks correct and consistent.

Types align with usage in client and tests; no issues spotted.

sdk/src/gateway/client.ts (2)

413-417: Field wiring LGTM.

creationDeadline is correctly derived as BigInt(quote.deadline); owner sourced from fromUserAddress matches the new type.


410-418: No stale identifiers remain. Verified that searches for orderCreationDeadline and orderOwner returned no matches.

sdk/test/gateway.test.ts (1)

473-477: Test updates match the new type names.

creationDeadline/owner assertions are now consistent with the SDK types.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants