feat(quick-dev): add Review Trail generation to step 5

[alexeyv]

Summary

• Adds a Review Trail generation step to step-05-present.md in the quick-dev-new-preview workflow
• Step 5 now builds a concern-ordered trail of clickable path:line stops with brief framing and appends it to the tech spec before committing
• The trail is a standalone review artifact — useful without any skill, a developer can read the spec and click through stops to understand the change top-down
• Existing Code Map is untouched; Review Trail is a separate post-implementation section

Context

Implements Story 1.1 from the av-hitl-review implementation plan (Phase 1 — Review Trail generation and presentation).

Test plan

• Run quick-dev-new-preview on a small change end-to-end — verify the spec gets a ## Review Trail section appended before the commit
• Confirm trail stops use path:line format and are ordered by concern, not by file
• Confirm the Code Map section is unchanged
• Verify the trail is comprehensible standalone (no skill needed to navigate it)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR enhances the bmad-quick-dev-new-preview workflow by generating a post-implementation “Review Trail” artifact during Step 5.

Changes:

• Adds a new “Generate Review Trail” section to step-05-present.md
• Derives a change diff since {baseline_commit} (from spec frontmatter) to identify what to include
• Appends a ## Review Trail section to {spec_file} without modifying the existing Code Map
• Defines a concern-ordered, top-down sequence of clickable path:line stops with one-line framing
• Updates the final “Commit and Present” instructions to call out the Review Trail as the primary navigation aid

Technical Notes: The trail is explicitly ordered by conceptual concern (not by file) and is intended to be a standalone reviewer guide appended just before committing.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updates the step-05-present.md workflow file to add a "Generate Review Trail" instructions block that guides users through reading the baseline commit and constructing an ordered diff trail with path:line references. Clarifies that the spec file contains a clickable Review Trail artifact in the commit summary.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Workflow Step Documentation src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-dev-new-preview/step-05-present.md	Adds new "Generate Review Trail" section with instructions for creating a concern-based diff trail and path:line references. Updates "Commit and Present" section to explicitly mention the Review Trail artifact as a clickable element in the spec file.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• fix(quick-dev): correct commit ordering, add loopback directive, fix typo #1876: Modifies the same step-05-present.md workflow file with related commit/present flow updates.
• fix(skill): validation cleanup for quick-flow skills #1997: Alters the same step-05-present.md file; complements the Review Trail additions with structural changes.
• refactor(bmm): convert quick-dev workflow to sharded format with adversarial review #1182: Implements adversarial review support and step-05 workflow enhancements that align with the Review Trail artifact guidance.

Suggested reviewers

• bmadcode

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding Review Trail generation functionality to step 5 of the quick-dev workflow.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description is directly related to the changeset, providing context about the Review Trail feature, its purpose, implementation details, and test plan for the modified step-05-present.md file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch feat/review-trail-generation

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-dev-new-preview/step-05-present.md (1)

17-17: Consider clarifying "best effort" guidance for diff construction.

The fallback "use best effort to determine what changed" is intentionally flexible, but could be more specific for agent execution. Consider:

Read `{baseline_commit}` from `{spec_file}` frontmatter. Construct the diff of all changes since `{baseline_commit}`. If `{baseline_commit}` is missing or `NO_VCS`, use session knowledge of modified files or `git status`/`git diff` to determine what changed.

This provides concrete fallback mechanisms while preserving agent discretion.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In
`@src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-dev-new-preview/step-05-present.md`
at line 17, The guidance "use best effort to determine what changed" is too
vague; update the step text that reads "If `{baseline_commit}` is missing or
`NO_VCS`, use best effort to determine what changed" to specify concrete
fallback mechanisms—e.g., check session knowledge of modified files, use `git
status`/`git diff` to build the diff, or fall back to any available workspace
change list or IDE file-change API—so agents have clear, actionable options for
constructing the diff when `{baseline_commit}` is absent.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In
`@src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-dev-new-preview/step-05-present.md`:
- Line 17: The guidance "use best effort to determine what changed" is too
vague; update the step text that reads "If `{baseline_commit}` is missing or
`NO_VCS`, use best effort to determine what changed" to specify concrete
fallback mechanisms—e.g., check session knowledge of modified files, use `git
status`/`git diff` to build the diff, or fall back to any available workspace
change list or IDE file-change API—so agents have clear, actionable options for
constructing the diff when `{baseline_commit}` is absent.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0f15a85d-bee4-40d1-94d1-4c35c2d3df0d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e5062a8 and af00f54.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/bmm/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/bmad-quick-dev-new-preview/step-05-present.md