fix(quick-flow): standardize menu shortcuts for intuitive UX#1401
Merged
bmadcode merged 2 commits intobmad-code-org:mainfrom Jan 25, 2026
Merged
fix(quick-flow): standardize menu shortcuts for intuitive UX#1401bmadcode merged 2 commits intobmad-code-org:mainfrom
bmadcode merged 2 commits intobmad-code-org:mainfrom
Conversation
…usion Users were typing 'a' expecting to Approve (since it starts with A) but triggering Advanced Elicitation instead. Changed shortcuts to: - [C] Continue (was [Y] Approve) - [E] Edit (was [C] Changes) This keeps [A] for Advanced Elicitation consistent with other workflows. Fixes user-reported UX issue with confusing menu shortcuts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughMenu options in the step-04-review workflow updated from "[Y] Approve [C] Changes" to "[C] Continue [E] Edit ...". Execution flow adjusted to require 'C' (Continue) instead of 'Y' to proceed to finalization. New 'E' (Edit) path and catch-all feedback handler added. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
- Change [T] to [P] for "Plan first" (P matches the label) - Change [1][2][3] to [W][F][S] for findings resolution: - [W] Walk through - [F] Fix automatically - [S] Skip Consistent with letter-based menu pattern used elsewhere. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
bmadcode
approved these changes
Jan 25, 2026
This was referenced Feb 14, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes confusing menu shortcuts across quick-spec and quick-dev workflows.
quick-spec (step-04-review)
aexpecting to Approve (since "Approve" starts with A) but triggering Advanced Elicitation instead[C] Continue(was[Y] Approve)[E] Edit(was[C] Changes)[A]for Advanced Elicitation consistent with other workflowsquick-dev (step-01, step-06)
[T]to[P]for "Plan first" — P matches the label[W] Walk through(was[1])[F] Fix automatically(was[2])[S] Skip(was[3])Test plan
quick-spec:
Ccontinues/finalizes the specEallows editing changesAstill triggers Advanced Elicitationquick-dev:
Ptriggers plan-first (tech-spec) flowW/F/Swork for findings resolution🤖 Generated with Claude Code