-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 299
[RELEASE] v0.2.1 #475
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
[RELEASE] v0.2.1 #475
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* fixes to documentation and docker * fix to docker * Apply suggestions from code review
* Release 0.2 * Release 0.2.0 * fix docs new line
* add forecasting_init.json to data files under setup * avoid undefined reference in scale_value
* checks for time series dataset split * maint * Update autoPyTorch/datasets/time_series_dataset.py Co-authored-by: Ravin Kohli <13005107+ravinkohli@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Ravin Kohli <13005107+ravinkohli@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix update of pipeline config options in fit pipeline * fix flake and test * suggestions from review
* add flexibility to avoid checking for test scores * fix flake and test * fix bug in tests * suggestions from review
* add parallel model runner and update running traditional classifiers * update pipeline config to pipeline options * working refit function * fix mypy and flake * suggestions from review * fix mypy and flake * suggestions from review * finish documentation * fix tests * add test for parallel model runner * fix flake * fix tests * fix traditional prediction for refit * suggestions from review * add warning for failed processing of results * remove unnecessary change * update autopytorch version number * update autopytorch version number and the example file
* Release 0.2.1 * add release docs * Update docs/releases.rst
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #475 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.53% 85.28% -0.26%
==========================================
Files 231 232 +1
Lines 16303 16456 +153
Branches 3009 3048 +39
==========================================
+ Hits 13945 14034 +89
- Misses 1520 1573 +53
- Partials 838 849 +11
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR fixes some minor bugs in v0.2.
Types of changes
Note that a Pull Request should only contain one of refactoring, new features or documentation changes.
Please separate these changes and send us individual PRs for each.
For more information on how to create a good pull request, please refer to The anatomy of a perfect pull request.
Checklist:
Description
This PR includes changes from
fit_pipeline
#466Motivation and Context
This PR addresses recent issues raised after v0.2's release. More information about the issues can be found in the description of each of the PRs.
How has this been tested?
Each PR has successfully passed the ci checks.