Skip to content

[SPARK-5722][SQL] fix for infer long type in python similar to Java long (master branch) #4641

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

dondrake
Copy link

Corresponding fix for SPARK-5722 for the master (1.3) branch. See Pull #4521 for 1.2 version.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

ok to test

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 17, 2015

Test build #27649 has started for PR 4641 at commit 9aa0737.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 17, 2015

Test build #27649 has finished for PR 4641 at commit 9aa0737.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27649/
Test FAILed.

@marmbrus
Copy link
Contributor

test this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 17, 2015

Test build #27658 has started for PR 4641 at commit 9aa0737.

  • This patch merges cleanly.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Feb 17, 2015

Test build #27658 has finished for PR 4641 at commit 9aa0737.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27658/
Test FAILed.

@davies
Copy link
Contributor

davies commented Feb 18, 2015

@dondrake Would you mind to close this one?

@dondrake
Copy link
Author

Closed as #4666 resolved this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants