Skip to content

[SPARK-26503][CORE][DOC][FOLLOWUP] Get rid of spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled #23529

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

MaxGekk
Copy link
Member

@MaxGekk MaxGekk commented Jan 12, 2019

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The SQL config spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled was removed by #23495. The PR cleans up the SQL migration guide and the comment for UnixTimestamp.

@MaxGekk
Copy link
Member Author

MaxGekk commented Jan 12, 2019

@srowen I accidentally found the config in a comment.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 12, 2019

Test build #101131 has finished for PR 23529 at commit 496e061.

  • This patch fails Spark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Jan 13, 2019

Test build #4507 has finished for PR 23529 at commit 496e061.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

Merged to master.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 4ff2b94 Jan 13, 2019
jackylee-ch pushed a commit to jackylee-ch/spark that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2019
…rser.enabled

## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

The SQL config `spark.sql.legacy.timeParser.enabled` was removed by apache#23495. The PR cleans up the SQL migration guide and the comment for `UnixTimestamp`.

Closes apache#23529 from MaxGekk/get-rid-off-legacy-parser-followup.

Authored-by: Maxim Gekk <max.gekk@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Hyukjin Kwon <gurwls223@apache.org>
@MaxGekk MaxGekk deleted the get-rid-off-legacy-parser-followup branch August 17, 2019 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants