Skip to content

[SPARK-14359] Create built-in functions for typed aggregates in Java #12168

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ericl
Copy link
Contributor

@ericl ericl commented Apr 5, 2016

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

This adds the corresponding Java static functions for built-in typed aggregates already exposed in Scala.

How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

@rxin

@ericl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ericl commented Apr 5, 2016

TODO: unit test java 8 lambdas

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Apr 5, 2016

Test build #54944 has finished for PR 12168 at commit 36c007a.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Apr 5, 2016

looks good. merging in master. can you prepare the java 8 lambda test in a follow-up pr?

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 0646230 Apr 5, 2016
@ericl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ericl commented Apr 5, 2016

Will do

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016, 10:33 PM asfgit notifications@github.com wrote:

Closed #12168 #12168 via 0646230
0646230
.


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#12168 (comment)

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2016
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Adds unit tests for java 8 lambda syntax with typed aggregates as a follow-up to #12168

## How was this patch tested?

Unit tests.

Author: Eric Liang <ekl@databricks.com>

Closes #12181 from ericl/sc-2794-2.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants