-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[feat][ci] check style for all source code #18142
Conversation
Looks good to me. Need to fix all the check styles issues to pass the CI. |
@RobertIndie all violations fixed. Please help with triggering CI on the main repo. @lhotari @codelipenghui I hope that this patch can get reviewed timely so that we don't conflict with incoming PRs - it touches a bunch of files. |
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
Dirty environment issue? |
Signed-off-by: tison <wander4096@gmail.com>
0eda68e remove mysterious dependency. I don't know whether it means some tricky logics. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #18142 +/- ##
=============================================
+ Coverage 34.91% 45.97% +11.05%
- Complexity 5707 17663 +11956
=============================================
Files 607 1574 +967
Lines 53396 128545 +75149
Branches 5712 14152 +8440
=============================================
+ Hits 18644 59095 +40451
- Misses 32119 63335 +31216
- Partials 2633 6115 +3482
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
private void internalFlushBatch( | ||
Deque<Record<T>> swapList, | ||
PreparedStatement currentBatch, | ||
int count, | ||
long start | ||
) throws SQLException { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems to be repeated with #18146.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@coderzc I think we should proceed with this patch since it adds a CI task to prevent regression.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But it's OK I do some rebases.
/pulsarbot run-failure-checks |
This closes #18131.
Documentation
doc
doc-required
doc-not-needed
doc-complete
Matching PR in the forked repository
PR in forked repository: tisonkun#7