Skip to content

MAPREDUCE-6729. Accurately compute the test execute time in DFSIO #111

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

rice668
Copy link

@rice668 rice668 commented Jul 7, 2016

When doing DFSIO test as a distributed i/o benchmark tool. Then especially writes plenty of files to disk or read from, both can cause performance issue and imprecise value in a way. The question is that existing practices needs to delete files when before running a job and that will cause extra time consumption and furthermore cause performance issue, statistical time error and imprecise throughput while the files are lots of. So we need to replace or improve this hack to prevent this from happening in the future.

…rite or read.

When doing DFSIO test as a distributed i/o benchmark tool. Then especially writes plenty of files to disk or read from, both can cause performance issue and imprecise value in a way. The question is that existing practices needs to delete files when before running a job and that will cause extra time consumption and furthermore cause performance issue, statistical time error and imprecise throughput while the files are lots of. So we need to replace or improve this hack to prevent this from happening in the future.
@rice668 rice668 changed the title MAPREDUCE-6729. Hitting performance and error when lots of files to w… MAPREDUCE-6729. Accurately compute the test execute time in DFSIO Jul 7, 2016
@rice668 rice668 closed this Jul 8, 2016
shanthoosh pushed a commit to shanthoosh/hadoop that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2019
Author: Jacob Maes <jmaes@linkedin.com>

Reviewers: Jagadish <jvenkatr@linkedin.com>

Closes apache#111 from jmakes/samza-1189
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants