Fix tune-runner-vm action to run correctly on ubuntu-24.04 image#4536
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
rerun failure checks |
This was referenced Dec 12, 2024
ubuntu-24.04 image
hezhangjian
approved these changes
Dec 16, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
Hi @shoothzj . Thank you for your review. This issue has already affected some PRs. |
lhotari
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2025
(cherry picked from commit e9b1949)
lhotari
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2025
(cherry picked from commit e9b1949)
priyanshu-ctds
pushed a commit
to datastax/bookkeeper
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 11, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
In the
ubuntu-24.04image, it seems/etc/docker/daemon.jsonfile does not exist.The CI action will always modify this file.
bookkeeper/.github/actions/tune-runner-vm/action.yml
Line 82 in b372e90
Therefore, the CI will fail as follows.
#4533 (comment)
I considered fixing it like apache/pulsar#22448, but I wonder if CI uses experimental features.
Changes