-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add the simple RC workflow to validate Go SDK with wordcount #34476
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment R: @Abacn for label build. Available commands:
The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for doing this
- name: Set up environment | ||
uses: ./.github/actions/setup-environment-action | ||
with: | ||
go-version: default, otherwise remove if default is 1.21 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be a comment? Seems like this will definitely error
working-directory: ./sdks/go/examples/wordcount | ||
run: | | ||
echo "--- PrismRunner WordCount Output ---" | ||
cat output_prism.txt* # Output might be sharded |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is the idea we will still ask folks to take a look at this output as part of the release instructions?
uses: actions/cache@v4 | ||
with: | ||
path: | | ||
~/.cache/go-build |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we've built anything, so I don't think this will do anything. In general, I don't see any real value in this caching step; the go builds are quite fast anyways.
runs-on: self-hosted | ||
outputs: | ||
rc_tag: ${{ github.event.inputs.rc_tag }} | ||
container_tag: ${{ github.event.inputs.container_tag }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't need this as an output - instead of referencing outputs in future jobs, you can just directly reference github.event.inputs.container_tag
- this just adds a layer of indirection
Thanks for the comments. The main goal for this PR is to create the stub for me to continue refining the workflow once this is merged first. I will address your comments later. Sounds good? |
I'm fine with that as long as they get addressed. I do think they will make life easier for you though, so I'd recommend taking them :) |
Addresses #34457
Need merge first and then do the real tests.
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123
), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>
instead.CHANGES.md
with noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.